Panel unit root tests under cross-sectional dependence
In this paper alternative approaches for testing the unit root hypothesis in panel data are considered. First, a robust version of the Dickey-Fuller t-statistic under contemporaneous correlated errors is suggested. Second, the GLS t-statistic is considered, which is based on the t-statistic of the transformed model. The asymptotic power of both tests against a sequence of local alternatives is compared. To adjust for short-run serial correlation of the errors, a pre-whitening procedure is suggested that yields a test statistic with a standard normal limiting distribution as N and T tends to infinity. The test procedure is further generalized to accommodate individual specific intercepts. From our Monte Carlo simulations it turns out that the robust OLS t-statistic performs well with respect to size and power, whereas the the GLS t-statistic may suffer from severe size distortions in small and moderate sample sizes. To improve the small sample properties of the GLS test procedure, a bootstrap version of the test is available.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 59 (2005)
Issue (Month): 4 ()
Pages: 414-433
| Handle: | RePEc:bla:stanee:v:59:y:2005:i:4:p:414-433 |
| Contact details of provider: | Web page: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0039-0402
|
| Order Information: | Web: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/subs.asp?ref=0039-0402 |
No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.
This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:stanee:v:59:y:2005:i:4:p:414-433. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing)
or (Christopher F. Baum)If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.