IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rdg/emxxdp/em-dp2025-05.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Does Liberalisation Reduce Labour Market Inequality? Caste and Occupational Outcomes in India

Author

Listed:
  • Ashmita Gupta

    (Asian Development Research Institute, India)

  • Neha Hui

    (Department of Economics, University of Reading)

Abstract

This paper investigates how trade liberalization reshaped caste-based occupational mobility in rural India. Using district-level exposure to the 1991 tariff reforms and nationally representative survey data, we provide the first causal evidence on how market integration affected labor market outcomes for Dalits (historically marginalized groups). We classify occupations by wages, skill intensity, task content, and international prestige scales to capture job quality. Our results show that while overall employment increased, Dalits in more liberalized districts were disproportionately excluded from high prestige occupations and shifted into low-wage, insecure work. Education emerges as a key mechanism: tariff exposure improved Dalit literacy but reduced higher-education attainment, limiting access to skilled jobs. These effects were most pronounced in states with flexible labor laws, where discriminatory hiring and firing practices could more easily operate. The findings demonstrate that structural reforms can reinforce existing social hierarchies, highlighting the importance of considering inequality transmission and barriers to mobility in assessing the population-wide effects of globalization.

Suggested Citation

  • Ashmita Gupta & Neha Hui, 2025. "Does Liberalisation Reduce Labour Market Inequality? Caste and Occupational Outcomes in India," Economics Discussion Papers em-dp2025-05, Department of Economics, University of Reading.
  • Handle: RePEc:rdg:emxxdp:em-dp2025-05
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://research.reading.ac.uk/economics/wp-content/uploads/sites/87/2025/11/emdp202505.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • J71 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor Discrimination - - - Hiring and Firing
    • O24 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy - - - Trade Policy; Factor Movement; Foreign Exchange Policy
    • J15 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of Minorities, Races, Indigenous Peoples, and Immigrants; Non-labor Discrimination

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rdg:emxxdp:em-dp2025-05. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alexander Mihailov (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/derdguk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.