IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/128276.html

Blowin’ in the Wind? Adapting to Atlantic Basin tropical cyclones with pesticides

Author

Listed:
  • Rafiq, Shuddhasattwa

Abstract

Using U.S. county-level data, we uncover a relatively overlooked coping strategy employed by farmers in response to cyclones: selective increase of pesticide application. By constructing a novel dataset spanning 25 years of tropical cyclone activity, pesticide use, and agricultural output, our difference-in- differences design reveals that farmers respond to cyclone shocks by applying more pesticides to protect their crops. On average, a typical U.S. farm applies approximately 2,150–2,250 kg more pesticides in both the event year and the following - around ten times the normal annual quantity. While rising pesticide use poses health and environmental risks, our heterogeneity analysis offers a more nuanced view. Farmers selectively boost pesticide applications to counter the rise in pests and pathogens that usually follow cyclones. They raise the use of lower-toxicity pesticides (e.g., 2,4-D, Metolachlor) but not highly hazardous ones (e.g., Chlorpyrifos), suggesting endogenous avoidance behavior consistent with risk awareness and regulatory constraints. These results hold robustly across eight measures of cyclone intensity, including rainfall, wind speed, and duration. In terms of coping mechanisms, farmers not only intensify pesticide use on existing crops but also expand their harvested acreage to compensate for yield losses, with effects lasting up to four years after a cyclone event. Overall, our results indicate that pesticide intensification, though adaptive in the short term, imposes considerable e and environmental trade-offs.

Suggested Citation

  • Rafiq, Shuddhasattwa, 2026. "Blowin’ in the Wind? Adapting to Atlantic Basin tropical cyclones with pesticides," MPRA Paper 128276, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:128276
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/128276/1/MPRA_paper_128276.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • Q1 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture
    • Q5 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:128276. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.