IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/125486.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Who Gains the Most from Trade Wars? Evidence from U.S. Import Shifting to Third Countries During the U.S.-China Trade Conflict

Author

Listed:
  • Nam, Jaejun

Abstract

I study the impact of Section 301 tariffs, focusing on how the reduction in Chinese exports was distributed between U.S. domestic suppliers and other foreign exporters. Using fixed effects regressions, I find that exports of tariffed goods increased significantly for third-country exporters that already held substantial U.S. market shares. This suggests that the benefits of the tariffs were concentrated among large foreign suppliers rather than small exporters or domestic producers. To explain this pattern, I develop a theoretical model based on the Ramsey-Cass-Koopmans framework while incorporating investment efficiency in the capital accumulation process. The model shows that high capital endowments and low input prices allow large exporters to capture the majority of gains from the tariffs. This result has clear policy implications: Section 301 tariffs could be ineffective at revitalizing U.S. industries. Instead, the gains were likely to be concentrated on large foreign exporters in both the short and long run. The model also implies that foreign governments might find wage restraint strategically advantageous in sustaining their export competitiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Nam, Jaejun, 2025. "Who Gains the Most from Trade Wars? Evidence from U.S. Import Shifting to Third Countries During the U.S.-China Trade Conflict," MPRA Paper 125486, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:125486
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/125486/1/MPRA_paper_125114.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • F10 - International Economics - - Trade - - - General
    • F13 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations
    • F14 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Empirical Studies of Trade

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:125486. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.