IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/luc/wpaper/24-09.html

German Energy Transition and Energy Security

Author

Listed:
  • Youngho Chang

    (Singapore University of Social Sciences, SG)

  • Ridwan D. Rusli

    (Technische Hochschule Köln, DE)

  • Jackson The

    (Nanyang Technological University, SG)

Abstract

The natural gas supply disruptions and European energy crisis following the Ukraine-Russia war and the West’s economic sanctions made energy security a top priority issue for the German government. We use the 4A framework of energy security to analyze Germany’s energy transition (“Energiewende”) over the last 20 years. While the acceptance of climate change policies is very high among its society and voters, affordability to energy consumers and availability of energy resources have steadily decreased in recent years. High feed-in tariffs and fuel taxes force German households to pay the highest electricity tariffs and among the highest fuel prices worldwide. More of the country’s fiscal capacity is required to support energy-intensive industries and fund energy subsidies. Exit from nuclear and coal electricity production necessitates increasing natural gas imports, requiring new LNG terminals, extensive collaboration with European neighbors and partially undermining the environmental benefits of the coal exit. Moreover, growth in renewables capacity has slowed down, hampered in part by local public resistance and increasing bureaucratic hurdles. The technological leadership of the country’s multinationals and SMEs has been challenged by increasingly sophisticated and efficient competitors, for example from China. To ensure Germany’s energy security the country must accelerate domestic renewables capacity and infrastructure, expand European gasand power interconnector investments and diversify its natural gas supply options.

Suggested Citation

  • Youngho Chang & Ridwan D. Rusli & Jackson The, 2024. "German Energy Transition and Energy Security," DEM Discussion Paper Series 24-09, Department of Economics at the University of Luxembourg.
  • Handle: RePEc:luc:wpaper:24-09
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.uni.lu/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2024/09/DP2024-09-German-Energy-Transition-and-Energy-Security.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yao, Lixia & Chang, Youngho, 2014. "Energy security in China: A quantitative analysis and policy implications," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 595-604.
    2. repec:aen:journl:1986v07-02-a03 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. repec:aen:journl:1995v16-02-a01 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. repec:aen:journl:hh-se-a09 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Chang, Youngho & Yong, Jiayun, 2007. "Differing perspectives of major oil firms on future energy developments: An illustrative framework," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(11), pages 5466-5480, November.
    6. repec:aen:journl:1988v09-02-a02 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Rehner, Robert & McCauley, Darren, 2016. "Security, justice and the energy crossroads: Assessing the implications of the nuclear phase-out in Germany," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 289-298.
    8. repec:aen:journl:1998v19-02-a05 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Peter R. Hartley & Kenneth B. Medlock III, 2009. "Potential Futures for Russian Natural Gas Exports," The Energy Journal, , vol. 30(1_suppl), pages 73-96, June.
    10. Westphal, Kirsten, 2014. "Institutional change in European natural gas markets and implications for energy security: Lessons from the German case," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 35-43.
    11. Mitchell, John V., 2002. "A new political economy of oil," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 251-272.
    12. Renn, Ortwin & Marshall, Jonathan Paul, 2016. "Coal, nuclear and renewable energy policies in Germany: From the 1950s to the “Energiewende”," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 224-232.
    13. Austvik, Ole Gunnar, 2016. "The Energy Union and security-of-gas supply," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 372-382.
    14. Gillessen, B. & Heinrichs, H. & Hake, J.-F. & Allelein, H.-J., 2019. "Natural gas as a bridge to sustainability: Infrastructure expansion regarding energy security and system transition," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    15. repec:aen:journl:hh-se-a06 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. repec:aen:journl:1982v03-02-a06 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Vivoda, Vlado, 2010. "Evaluating energy security in the Asia-Pacific region: A novel methodological approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(9), pages 5258-5263, September.
    18. repec:aen:journl:ej36-3-metcal is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Zengchuan & Xi, Yanling & Li, Li & Lei, Yalin & Wu, Sanmang & Cui, Yanfang & Chen, Jiabin, 2025. "The spatial-temporal characterization of the driving factors of China's energy transition and prediction of future transition potential," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yao, Lixia & Chang, Youngho, 2014. "Energy security in China: A quantitative analysis and policy implications," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 595-604.
    2. Wang, Qiang & Zhou, Kan, 2017. "A framework for evaluating global national energy security," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 19-31.
    3. Song, Yan & Zhang, Ming & Sun, Ruifeng, 2019. "Using a new aggregated indicator to evaluate China's energy security," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 167-174.
    4. Pin Li & Jinsuo Zhang, 2019. "Is China’s Energy Supply Sustainable? New Research Model Based on the Exponential Smoothing and GM(1,1) Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-30, January.
    5. Youngho CHANG & Yanfei LI, 2014. "Non-renewable Resources in Asian Economies: Perspective of Availability, Applicability Acceptability, and Affordability," Working Papers DP-2014-04, Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA).
    6. Gillessen, B. & Heinrichs, H. & Hake, J.-F. & Allelein, H.-J., 2019. "Natural gas as a bridge to sustainability: Infrastructure expansion regarding energy security and system transition," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    7. Milan Hudak, 2026. "The European Gas Market Integration During 2018–2024," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 67(5), pages 3347-3430, May.
    8. Yupei Du & Wenju Wang & Qian Lu & Ziyang Li, 2020. "A DPSIR-TODIM Model Security Evaluation of China’s Rare Earth Resources," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-24, September.
    9. Akusta, Emre, 2024. "The impacts of different types of globalization on energy security risk: Can globalization be a remedy for the energy security risk of OECD countries?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).
    10. Zhang, Long & Bai, Wuliyasu & Xiao, Huijuan & Ren, Jingzheng, 2021. "Measuring and improving regional energy security: A methodological framework based on both quantitative and qualitative analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    11. Qingsong Wang & Hongrui Tang & Xueliang Yuan & Mansen Wang & Hongkun Xiao & Zhi Ma, 2018. "An Early Warning System for Oil Security in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-17, January.
    12. Liedtke, Stephan, 2017. "Chinese energy investments in Europe: An analysis of policy drivers and approaches," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 659-669.
    13. Wang, Kai-Hua & Su, Chi-Wei & Umar, Muhammad, 2021. "Geopolitical risk and crude oil security: A Chinese perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    14. Wang, Deqing & Tian, Sihua & Fang, Lei & Xu, Yan, 2020. "A functional index model for dynamically evaluating China's energy security," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    15. Tongsopit, Sopitsuda & Kittner, Noah & Chang, Youngho & Aksornkij, Apinya & Wangjiraniran, Weerin, 2016. "Energy security in ASEAN: A quantitative approach for sustainable energy policy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 60-72.
    16. Yuan, Jiahang & Wang, Li & Li, Yating & Wang, Yuwei & Ma, Tao & Luo, Xinggang, 2022. "Set pair prediction for Chinese natural gas energy security based on higher-order Markov chain with risk attitude," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    17. Amin, Sakib Bin & Chang, Youngho & Khan, Farhan & Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farhad, 2022. "Energy security and sustainable energy policy in Bangladesh: From the lens of 4As framework," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    18. Sun, Xiaolei & Liu, Chang & Chen, Xiuwen & Li, Jianping, 2017. "Modeling systemic risk of crude oil imports: Case of China’s global oil supply chain," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 449-465.
    19. Vivoda, Vlado, 2019. "LNG import diversification and energy security in Asia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 967-974.
    20. Thauan Santos & Amaro Olímpio Pereira Júnior & Emilio Lèbre La Rovere, 2017. "Evaluating Energy Policies through the Use of a Hybrid Quantitative Indicator-Based Approach: The Case of Mercosur," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-15, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • Q41 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Demand and Supply; Prices
    • Q42 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Alternative Energy Sources
    • Q48 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Government Policy

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:luc:wpaper:24-09. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marina Legrand The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Marina Legrand to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/crcrplu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.