IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iza/izadps/dp18765.html

When a Common Shock Hits Differently: Gender, Adolescence, and the COVID-19 Well-Being Gap

Author

Listed:
  • Bousselin, Audrey

    (Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER))

  • Sologon, Denisa

    (Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER))

Abstract

Adverse shocks can create inequalities if some groups respond more strongly than others. This paper examines whether a common disruption leads to differential changes in children’s subjective well-being by gender. We use longitudinal data from the Luxembourg Child Well-Being Survey, which follows the same children before (2019) and after (2021) the COVID-19 shock, a major disruption to schooling, social interactions, and daily routines. Using fixed-effects models, we estimate within-child changes in life satisfaction, positive affect, and negative affect. Girls and boys report similar levels of life satisfaction and positive affect before the disruption, but follow different trajectories afterward. Girls experience larger declines in life satisfaction and positive affect and a larger increase in negative affect, with the sharpest deteriorations concentrated in school experiences, family relationships, self-perceptions, and loneliness. As a result, a sizeable gender gap in subjective well-being emerge, which increases with age and remains robust to alternative specifications, selective attrition, and alternative cardinalizations of ordinal well-being scales. The gender gap is not concentrated among specific socio-economic groups.

Suggested Citation

  • Bousselin, Audrey & Sologon, Denisa, 2026. "When a Common Shock Hits Differently: Gender, Adolescence, and the COVID-19 Well-Being Gap," IZA Discussion Papers 18765, IZA Network @ LISER.
  • Handle: RePEc:iza:izadps:dp18765
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://docs.iza.org/dp18765.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • I31 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - General Welfare, Well-Being
    • I14 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health and Inequality
    • I21 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Analysis of Education
    • J13 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Fertility; Family Planning; Child Care; Children; Youth
    • J16 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination
    • D63 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iza:izadps:dp18765. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mark Fallak (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/izaaalu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.