IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/inq/inqwps/ecineq2025-683.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Opportunity bottlenecks: an empirical application

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandru Cojocaru

    (The World Bank)

Abstract

The study undertakes a first quantitative empirical application of Joseph Fishkin’stheory of opportunity bottlenecks. Taking advantage of survey data on key features ofopportunity bottlenecks in the Life in Transition survey for a large set of countries inEurope and Central Asia, the study describes the extent of instrumental bottlenecks,namely the need for personal connections to gain access to a set of key opportunities inlife, such as a good job or university education. These opportunity bottlenecks are thenshown to be relevant for people’s evaluations of job and life satisfaction, and for theiraspirations of future socio-economic mobility. Moreover, the need for, and availabilityof, informal connections are material to individual employment sector location, whethergovernment or private sector. While the availability of informal connections need notnegate the constraining effects of opportunity bottlenecks in theory, the results suggestthat in practice, informal connections fully undo the the negative effects imposed byopportunity bottlenecks.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandru Cojocaru, 2025. "Opportunity bottlenecks: an empirical application," Working Papers 683, ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality.
  • Handle: RePEc:inq:inqwps:ecineq2025-683
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ecineq.org/milano/WP/ECINEQ2025-683.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2025
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    opportunity bottlenecks; inequality of opportunity; opportunity pluralism;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D3 - Microeconomics - - Distribution
    • I32 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - Measurement and Analysis of Poverty
    • P20 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Socialist and Transition Economies - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inq:inqwps:ecineq2025-683. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Maria Ana Lugo The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Maria Ana Lugo to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ecineea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.