IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05500048.html

Default energy sharing rule: The case of France

Author

Listed:
  • Julien Jacqmin

    (NEOMA - Neoma Business School)

  • Marco Gazel

    (NEOMA - Neoma Business School)

  • Isac Olave-Cruz

    (LERN - Laboratoire d'Economie Rouen Normandie - UNIROUEN - Université de Rouen Normandie - NU - Normandie Université - IRIHS - Institut de Recherche Interdisciplinaire Homme et Société - UNIROUEN - Université de Rouen Normandie - NU - Normandie Université)

Abstract

This policy perspective critically examines the French regulatory framework that governs collective self-consumption of electricity. Under the French Energy Code, energy sharing is subject to a dynamic pro rata to consumption rule by default. We demonstrate how behavioral biases and governance structures lead members to stick to this default. Furthermore, our analysis highlights several shortcomings within this regulatory framework. First, it can create inequitable distributions when members have different consumption profiles or flexibility. Second, it may generate price signals with counterproductive effects, even if the community setting brings some new scrutiny to individual actions. Finally, this centralized approach fundamentally contradicts the decentralized ethos that underpins these initiatives. By highlighting these limitations, we aim to improve the current regulations to boost the development of collective self-consumption and better inform their members before deciding which energy sharing rule to pick.

Suggested Citation

  • Julien Jacqmin & Marco Gazel & Isac Olave-Cruz, 2026. "Default energy sharing rule: The case of France," Post-Print hal-05500048, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05500048
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2026.115074
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05500048v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-05500048v1/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2026.115074?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:aen:journl:ej41-1-lambin is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Balegamire, Remy & Gautier, Axel, 2025. "Pricing and sharing rules for energy communities," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    3. Norbu, Sonam & Couraud, Benoit & Robu, Valentin & Andoni, Merlinda & Flynn, David, 2021. "Modelling the redistribution of benefits from joint investments in community energy projects," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).
    4. Viadere, Elise, 2025. "Promoting energy-sharing communities: Why and how? Lessons from a Belgian pilot project," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    5. Richard H. Thaler & Cass R. Sunstein, 2023. "Libertarian paternalism," Chapters, in: Cass R. Sunstein & Lucia A. Reisch (ed.), Research Handbook on Nudges and Society, chapter 1, pages 10-16, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. Kenneth Gillingham & David Rapson & Gernot Wagner, 2016. "The Rebound Effect and Energy Efficiency Policy," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 10(1), pages 68-88.
    7. Dorian Frieden & Andreas Tuerk & Ana Rita Antunes & Vasilakis Athanasios & Alexandros-Georgios Chronis & Stanislas d’Herbemont & Mislav Kirac & Rita Marouço & Camilla Neumann & Esteban Pastor Catalayu, 2021. "Are We on the Right Track? Collective Self-Consumption and Energy Communities in the European Union," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-26, November.
    8. Harald Mayr & Mateus Souza, 2025. "The Tragedy of the Common Heating Bill," CESifo Working Paper Series 12185, CESifo.
    9. Ibrahim Abada & Andreas Ehrenmann & Xavier Lambin, 2020. "On the Viability of Energy Communities," The Energy Journal, , vol. 41(1), pages 113-150, January.
    10. Katrina Jessoe & David Rapson, 2014. "Knowledge Is (Less) Power: Experimental Evidence from Residential Energy Use," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 104(4), pages 1417-1438, April.
    11. Minuto, Francesco Demetrio & Lanzini, Andrea, 2022. "Energy-sharing mechanisms for energy community members under different asset ownership schemes and user demand profiles," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    12. Qiu, Yueming & Kahn, Matthew E. & Xing, Bo, 2019. "Quantifying the rebound effects of residential solar panel adoption," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 310-341.
    13. Bauwens, Thomas, 2016. "Explaining the diversity of motivations behind community renewable energy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 278-290.
    14. Guetlein, Marie-Charlotte & Schleich, Joachim, 2024. "Empirical insights into enabling and impeding factors for increasing citizen investments in renewable energy communities," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    15. Gautier, Axel & Jacqmin, Julien & Poudou, Jean-Christophe, 2025. "The energy community and the grid," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    16. Raj Chetty, 2015. "Behavioral Economics and Public Policy: A Pragmatic Perspective," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 105(5), pages 1-33, May.
    17. repec:bon:boncrc:crctr224_2025_629 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Cass R. Sunstein & Richard H. Thaler, 2003. "Libertarian paternalism is not an oxymoron," Conference Series ; [Proceedings], Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, vol. 48(Jun).
    19. Bigler, Patrick, 2025. "Magnitude and decomposition of the solar rebound: Evidence from Swiss households," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    20. Dudka, Aurore & Moratal, Nuria & Bauwens, Thomas, 2023. "A typology of community-based energy citizenship: An analysis of the ownership structure and institutional logics of 164 energy communities in France," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    21. Melville, Emilia & Christie, Ian & Burningham, Kate & Way, Celia & Hampshire, Phil, 2017. "The electric commons: A qualitative study of community accountability," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 12-21.
    22. Soares, João & Lezama, Fernando & Faia, Ricardo & Limmer, Steffen & Dietrich, Manuel & Rodemann, Tobias & Ramos, Sergio & Vale, Zita, 2024. "Review on fairness in local energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 374(C).
    23. Hanke, Florian & Day, Rosie & Burchell, Kevin & Thomson, Harriet, 2026. "Tackling energy poverty in Europe through energy communities: tracing the innovation journeys to support an emerging niche," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    24. Daniel Kahneman & Jack L. Knetsch & Richard H. Thaler, 1991. "Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 5(1), pages 193-206, Winter.
    25. Vernay, Anne-Lorène & Sebi, Carine & Arroyo, Fabrice, 2023. "Energy community business models and their impact on the energy transition: Lessons learnt from France," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    26. Elise Viadere, 2025. "Promoting energy-sharing communities: Why and how? Lessons from a Belgian pilot project," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/389043, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    27. Cortade, Thomas & Poudou, Jean-Christophe, 2022. "Peer-to-peer energy platforms: Incentives for prosuming," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    28. Schubert, Christian, 2017. "Green nudges: Do they work? Are they ethical?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 329-342.
    29. Koichiro Ito & Takanori Ida & Makoto Tanaka, 2018. "Moral Suasion and Economic Incentives: Field Experimental Evidence from Energy Demand," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 10(1), pages 240-267, February.
    30. Boccard, Nicolas & Gautier, Axel, 2021. "Solar rebound: The unintended consequences of subsidies," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Massé, Pierre-Yves & Ling, Haicheng & Rihet, Thibault, 2026. "Nudging based residential flexibility in a renewable energy community: a small scale case study in France," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gautier, Axel & Jacqmin, Julien & Poudou, Jean-Christophe, 2025. "The energy community and the grid," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    2. Ghesla, Claus & Grieder, Manuel & Schubert, Renate, 2020. "Nudging the poor and the rich – A field study on the distributional effects of green electricity defaults," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    3. Abada, Ibrahim & Ehrenmann, Andreas & Lambin, Xavier, 2025. "Risk-sharing in energy communities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 322(3), pages 870-888.
    4. Florian Hanke & Jens Lowitzsch, 2020. "Empowering Vulnerable Consumers to Join Renewable Energy Communities—Towards an Inclusive Design of the Clean Energy Package," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-27, April.
    5. Wang, Wenjie & Ida, Takanori & Shimada, Hideki, 2020. "Default effect versus active decision: Evidence from a field experiment in Los Alamos," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    6. Cardella, Eric & Ewing, Brad & Williams, Ryan Blake, "undated". "Green is Good – The Impact of Information Nudges on the Adoption of Voluntary Green Power Plans," 2018 Annual Meeting, February 2-6, 2018, Jacksonville, Florida 266583, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    7. Joshua Henkel & Georg Schwesinger, 2020. "Establishing Sustainable Consumption - How Future Policies Can Channel Consumer Preferences," Bremen Papers on Economics & Innovation 2007, University of Bremen, Faculty of Business Studies and Economics.
    8. Marc A. Ragin & Benjamin L. Collier & Johannes G. Jaspersen, 2021. "The effect of information disclosure on demand for high‐load insurance," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 88(1), pages 161-193, March.
    9. Brülisauer, Marcel & Goette, Lorenz & Jiang, Zhengyi & Schmitz, Jan & Schubert, Renate, 2020. "Appliance-specific feedback and social comparisons: Evidence from a field experiment on energy conservation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    10. Chakravarty, Sujoy & Mishra, Rajan, 2019. "Using social norms to reduce paper waste: Results from a field experiment in the Indian Information Technology sector," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1-1.
    11. Eiichi Tomiura & Banri Ito & Hiroshi Mukunoki & Ryuhei Wakasugi, 2016. "Individual Characteristics, Behavioral Biases, and Trade Policy Preferences: Evidence from a Survey in Japan," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(5), pages 1081-1095, November.
    12. Liu, Jia & Sonntag, Axel & Zizzo, Daniel John, 2022. "Information defaults in repeated public good provision," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 356-369.
    13. Klotz, Leidy & Mack, Daniel & Klapthor, Brent & Tunstall, Casey & Harrison, Jennilee, 2010. "Unintended anchors: Building rating systems and energy performance goals for U.S. buildings," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(7), pages 3557-3566, July.
    14. Adélaïde Fadhuile & Daniel Llerena & Béatrice Roussillon, 2023. "Intrinsic Motivation to Promote the Development of Renewable Energy : A Field Experiment from Household Demand," Working Papers hal-03977597, HAL.
    15. García-Altés, Anna, 2013. "Aportaciones de la economía del comportamiento en política sanitaria: Algunas notas en torno al ejemplo de la obesidad/Contributions of Behavioral Economics in Health Policy: Some Notes Around the Exa," Estudios de Economia Aplicada, Estudios de Economia Aplicada, vol. 31, pages 445-454, Septiembr.
    16. Christian Cordes & Joshua Henkel, 2022. "Enhanced "Green Nudging": Tapping the Channels of Cultural Transmission," Bremen Papers on Economics & Innovation 2208, University of Bremen, Faculty of Business Studies and Economics.
    17. Kaenzig, Josef & Heinzle, Stefanie Lena & Wüstenhagen, Rolf, 2013. "Whatever the customer wants, the customer gets? Exploring the gap between consumer preferences and default electricity products in Germany," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 311-322.
    18. Guetlein, Marie-Charlotte & Schleich, Joachim, 2024. "Empirical insights into enabling and impeding factors for increasing citizen investments in renewable energy communities," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    19. Christian Schubert, 2015. "On the ethics of public nudging: Autonomy and Agency," MAGKS Papers on Economics 201533, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).
    20. Laura Abrardi, 2019. "Behavioral barriers and the energy efficiency gap: a survey of the literature," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 46(1), pages 25-43, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • L3 - Industrial Organization - - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise
    • Q48 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05500048. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.