IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05252430.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A core multi-criteria framework for assessing the performance of policies related to risk: a case study on risk policy for high risk sites

Author

Listed:
  • Scarlett Tannous

    (LAMSADE - Laboratoire d'analyse et modélisation de systèmes pour l'aide à la décision - Université Paris Dauphine-PSL - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Terje Aven

    (University of Stavanger)

  • Myriam Merad

    (LAMSADE - Laboratoire d'analyse et modélisation de systèmes pour l'aide à la décision - Université Paris Dauphine-PSL - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

Today most public authorities have implemented some type of risk governance framework or system, which provides structure, approaches, and methods for how to handle societal risks. One main challenge of risk-related policies and frameworks is to adequately and effectively take into account risks. To meet this challenge there is a need for knowledge about the performance of the various policies on risk. However, such knowledge is not easily derived since the performance is subject to uncertainties and is difficult to measure -especially before the occurrence of impacts, which can be significant when focusing on high-risk sites. The present paper discusses this issue of risk policy performance or "effectiveness". The main aim is to establish a set of suitable criteria for assessing the performance of such risk policies by relying on both (1) foundational theoretical and methodological studies and (2) empirical and methodological case studies. Results provide new insights into risk policy assessment by relating the discussion to current risk science knowledge and multi-criteria decision analysis. Consequently, a novel multi-criteria framework consisting of 16 assessment criteria is proposed to cover the spectrum of various improvements, degradations, or stagnations of the effectiveness of risk policies. The discussion is illustrated by a case study on a risk policy linked to a high-risk site in the chemical and petrochemical industry. Based on 25 interviews with risk actors, the study findings reveal how perceived policy improvements or degradations vary under the proposed set of criteria including efficiency, efficacy, and reputational effects. The main contribution demonstrates the practicability of the proposed risk policy assessment framework consisting of 16 criteria. Further research can include the investigation of the Multiple-Criteria Decision Aiding (MCDA) techniques to support the application of this framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Scarlett Tannous & Terje Aven & Myriam Merad, 2025. "A core multi-criteria framework for assessing the performance of policies related to risk: a case study on risk policy for high risk sites," Post-Print hal-05252430, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05252430
    DOI: 10.1016/j.esr.2025.101870
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05252430v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-05252430v1/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.esr.2025.101870?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05252430. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.