IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jrpoli/v74y2021ics0301420717302106.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regulatory regime on coal Mine Safety in China and Australia: Comparative analysis and overall findings

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Quanlong
  • Li, Xinchun
  • Hassall, Maureen

Abstract

China and Australia are the world's largest coal producers and exporters respectively. Both countries have developed the separate regulatory regime to regulate their coal mine safety. But Australia is far ahead of China in terms of coal mine safety. It appears that there remains significant scope for improvement on China's separate regulatory regime. This article explores the similarities and differences between the regulatory regimes of China and Australia, and introduces a slice of the arguments used to explain the distinct gap in mine safety. The first and foremost, the mining Occupational Health & Safety (OHS) legislation in Australia is based upon duty of care, risk management principles and workforce representation, while in China the mining OHS legislation could be characterized as being uniformly prescriptive. Secondly, the regulatory agencies in China, namely the State Administration of Coal Mine Safety (SACMS) and local regulation department of coal mine safety possess a multiple of distinctive problems. Thirdly, coal mines in China are divided into the state-owned coal mines (SOCMs) and township and village coal mines (TVCMs) which differ quite widely, including the mine ownership, mine objectives, and coal pricing. In addition the mine workers are powerless in the matter of coal mine safety regulation.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Quanlong & Li, Xinchun & Hassall, Maureen, 2021. "Regulatory regime on coal Mine Safety in China and Australia: Comparative analysis and overall findings," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:74:y:2021:i:c:s0301420717302106
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.101454
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420717302106
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.101454?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lewis-Beck, Michael S. & Alford, John R., 1980. "Can Government Regulate Safety? The Coal Mine Example," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 74(3), pages 745-756, September.
    2. Wayne B. Gray & John M. Mendeloff, 2005. "The Declining Effects of Osha Inspections on Manufacturing Injuries, 1979–1998," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 58(4), pages 571-587, July.
    3. Andrews-Speed, Philip & Ma, Guo & Shao, Bingjia & Liao, Chenglin, 2005. "Economic responses to the closure of small-scale coal mines in Chongqing, China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 39-54, March.
    4. Kolstad, Ivar & Wiig, Arne, 2009. "Is Transparency the Key to Reducing Corruption in Resource-Rich Countries?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 521-532, March.
    5. Song, Xiaoqian & Mu, Xiaoyi, 2013. "The safety regulation of small-scale coal mines in China: Analysing the interests and influences of stakeholders," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 472-481.
    6. W. Kip Viscusi, 1979. "The Impact of Occupational Safety and Health Regulation," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 10(1), pages 117-140, Spring.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jingzhi, Wang & Quanlong, Liu & Jianping, Shang & Weichao, Niu, 2024. "Research on the impacting mechanism and enhancement strategies for the effect of safety regulation in Chinese coal mine," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    2. Zhang, Wei & Wang, Yaru & Fan, Fengchun, 2023. "How does coordinated development of two-way foreign direct investment affect natural resources Utilization?——Spatial analysis based on China's coal resource utilization efficiency," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
    3. Liu, Quanlong & Wang, Jingzhi & Qiu, Zunxiang, 2023. "Data as evidence: Research on the influencing factors and mechanisms of coal mine safety supervision effect in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    4. Can Xie & Hongxia Li & Lei Chen, 2023. "A Three-Party Decision Evolution Game Analysis of Coal Companies and Miners under China’s Government Safety Special Rectification Action," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-23, November.
    5. Lixia Niu & Wende Xia & Yafan Qiao, 2022. "The Influence of Leader Bottom-Line Mentality on Miners’ Safety Behavior: A Moderated Parallel Mediation Model Based on the Dual-System Theory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-21, September.
    6. Wu, Bing & Wang, Jingxin & Qu, Baolin & Qi, Pengyuan & Meng, Yu, 2023. "Development, effectiveness, and deficiency of China's Coal Mine Safety Supervision System," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Quanlong & Li, Xinchun & Qiao, Wanguan & Meng, Xianfei & Li, Xiangong & Shi, Tian, 2017. "Analysis of embedded non-safety regulation games in China's two types of coal mines through safety performance disparity, 1980–2014," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 265-271.
    2. Xu, Hangtian & Nakajima, Kentaro, 2016. "Did China's coal mine regulation positively affect economic growth?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 160-168.
    3. Shuai Han & Hong Chen & Maggie-Anne Harvey & Eric Stemn & David Cliff, 2018. "Focusing on Coal Workers’ Lung Diseases: A Comparative Analysis of China, Australia, and the United States," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-26, November.
    4. Liu, Quanlong & Wang, Jingzhi & Qiu, Zunxiang, 2023. "Data as evidence: Research on the influencing factors and mechanisms of coal mine safety supervision effect in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    5. Wu, Bing & Wang, Jingxin & Qu, Baolin & Qi, Pengyuan & Meng, Yu, 2023. "Development, effectiveness, and deficiency of China's Coal Mine Safety Supervision System," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    6. Fan, Di & Yeung, Andy C.L. & Yiu, Daphne W. & Lo, Chris K.Y., 2022. "Safety regulation enforcement and production safety: The role of penalties and voluntary safety management systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    7. Song, Xiaoqian & Mu, Xiaoyi, 2013. "The safety regulation of small-scale coal mines in China: Analysing the interests and influences of stakeholders," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 472-481.
    8. Lynda R Matthews & Scott J Fitzpatrick & Philip Bohle & Michael Quinlan, 2014. "Investigation and prosecution following workplace fatalities: Responding to the needs of families," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 25(2), pages 253-270, June.
    9. Gray, Wayne B & Jones, Carol Adaire, 1991. "Are OSHA Health Inspections Effective? A Longitudinal Study in the Manufacturing Sector," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 73(3), pages 504-508, August.
    10. Tomas Bonavia & Josué Brox-Ponce, 2018. "Shame in decision making under risk conditions: Understanding the effect of transparency," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-16, February.
    11. Hu, Juncheng, 2021. "Do facilitation payments affect earnings management? Evidence from China," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    12. Christine Jolls, 2007. "Employment Law and the Labor Market," NBER Working Papers 13230, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    13. Anderton Charles H. & Anderton Roxane A., 2021. "The Trade Disruption Hypothesis Fails for State-Sponsored Genocides and Mass Atrocities: Why It Matters," Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 27(2), pages 143-168, May.
    14. Stephen Taiwo Onifade & Bright Akwasi Gyamfi & Ilham Haouas & Simplice A. Asongu, 2024. "Extending the frontiers of financial development for sustainability of the MENA states: The roles of resource abundance and institutional quality," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(3), pages 1971-1986, June.
    15. Alessandro, Martin & Cardinale Lagomarsino, Bruno & Scartascini, Carlos & Streb, Jorge & Torrealday, Jerónimo, 2021. "Transparency and Trust in Government. Evidence from a Survey Experiment," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    16. Khadjavi, Menusch & Lange, Andreas & Nicklisch, Andreas, 2014. "The Social Value of Transparency and Accountability: Experimental Evidence from Asymmetric Public Good Games," VfS Annual Conference 2014 (Hamburg): Evidence-based Economic Policy 100512, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    17. López-Cazar, Ibeth & Papyrakis, Elissaios & Pellegrini, Lorenzo, 2021. "The Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) and corruption in Latin America: Evidence from Colombia, Guatemala, Honduras, Peru, and Trinidad and Tobago," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    18. Georges Dionne & Paul Lanoie, 2002. "How to Make a Public Choice About the Value of a Statistical Life: The Case of Road Safety," Cahiers de recherche 02-04, HEC Montréal, Institut d'économie appliquée.
    19. Yang, Qing & Zhang, Lei & Zhang, Jinsuo & Zou, Shaohui, 2021. "System simulation and policy optimization of China's coal production capacity deviation in terms of the economy, environment, and energy security," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    20. Ogbe, Michael & Lujala, Päivi, 2021. "Spatial crowdsourcing in natural resource revenue management," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:74:y:2021:i:c:s0301420717302106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30467 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.