Projective Techniques Are they a Victim of Clashing Paradigms
This paper reviews the concept and historical development of pro- jective techniques. It considers why, given the importance of their psychoanalytical foundations to the underlying paradigms of manage- ment theory, they have been generally marginalised as a mainstream business and management research tool. Projective techniques are defined and their historical origins delineated. This is followed by an overview of projective `types'. Some of the general advantages and current issues associated with employing projective techniques are also presented. Thereafter a discussion of the reasons projective techniques have not been widely adopted by positivist academic management re- searchers is made. We put forward the central argument that since many of the challenges facing management research are due to the restrictions introduced by bounded rationality, projective techniques offer a possible alternative to traditional mixed methods.
|Date of creation:||Jun 2010|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Phone: 028 9036 6351|
Fax: 028 9036 6805
Web page: http://www.business.ulster.ac.uk/retailfinancial/
More information through EDIRC
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Richard M. Cyert & Herbert A. Simon & Donald B. Trow, 1956. "Observation of a Business Decision," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 29, pages 237.
- Ramsey, Elaine & Bond, Derek, 2006.
"Evaluating Public Policy Formation and Support Mechanisms for Technological Innovation,"
253, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Elaine Ramsey & Derek Bond, 2007. "Evaluating Public Policy Formation and Support Mechanisms for Technological Innovation," International Review of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(3), pages 403-418.
- Fisher, Robert J, 1993. " Social Desirability Bias and the Validity of Indirect Questioning," Journal of Consumer Research, Oxford University Press, vol. 20(2), pages 303-15, September.
- Samuel Natale & Sebastian Sora, 2010. "Ethics in Strategic Thinking: Business Processes and the Global Market Collapse," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 94(3), pages 309-316, July.
- Steven Kates (ed.), 2011. "The Global Financial Crisis," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14454.
- Clive Boddy, 2011. "The Corporate Psychopaths Theory of the Global Financial Crisis," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 102(2), pages 255-259, August.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fsr:wpaper:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Derek Bond)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.