IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Selected MENA Countries’ Attractiveness to G7 Investors

  • Fathi Abid

    ()

    (University of Sfax, Tunisia)

  • Slah Bahloul
Registered author(s):

    The objective of this paper is to evaluate the relative attractiveness of seven MENA countries (Algeria, Egypt, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Morocco, Tunisia and Turkey) as a location for foreign portfolio investment (FPI) from the G7 investors viewpoint. We suggest a methodology based on the combination of the gravity model, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the goal programming model (GP). The gravity model is used to determine the attractiveness factors of a country with respect to FPI for 30 investing and 43 receiving countries for the year 2001. Results show the importance of information costs and bilateral trade in the determination of the bilateral asset holdings. The AHP method is applied to prioritize the set of FPI location alternatives from the different viewpoints of G7 investors according to variables’ significance in the gravity model outcome; information costs, bilateral trade, investment freedom, GDP, institutional quality and geographic distance. Results for the year 2005 show that Saudi Arabia is the most attractive country for Japanese and American investors, Turkey is the favorite location for French, German, Italian and British investors and Algeria is the preferred destination for Canadian investors. A combined AHP-GP model has been used to determine the degree of portfolio investment in each MENA country from the viewpoint of G7 investors for the period 2003-2006. Results show that the relative attractiveness of MENA countries is time-varying but they have approximately the same degree of attractiveness from the G7 investor’s viewpoints. In general, the most attractive country for FPI is Turkey for all G7 investors and Saudi Arabia ranks second. For a MENA country to attract more FPI it should especially improve bilateral trade and institutional quality and reduce foreign investment restrictions and information costs.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL: http://www.erf.org.eg/CMS/getFile.php?id=1725
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.erf.org.eg/cms.php?id=NEW_publication_details_working_papers&publication_id=1241
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Economic Research Forum in its series Working Papers with number 531.

    as
    in new window

    Length: 27 pages
    Date of creation: Jul 2010
    Date of revision: Jul 2010
    Publication status: Published by The Economic Research Forum (ERF)
    Handle: RePEc:erg:wpaper:531
    Contact details of provider: Postal: 7 Boulos Hanna Street, Dokki, Cairo
    Phone: 202-3370810
    Fax: 202-3616042
    Web page: http://www.erf.org.eg
    Email:


    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:erg:wpaper:531. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Namees Nabeel)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.