Rethinking Time Allocation Of Egyptian Women: A Matching Analysis
To our knowledge, the present research is the first to explore the extremely biased division of labor within Egyptian households. Time activities in respect of paid and unpaid work are an important aspect of this study. The classical dichotomy of “work in the market” versus “leisure” may serve as a good approximation of the role the male plays in the production activity of the household but does grave injustice to the female since it overlooks the whole time she spends outside the market—on domestic activities. Moreover, studying the females’ invisible unpaid work is crucial since it remains the females’ main occupation. Time-use profiles are constructed using the Egyptian time-use data available, only for females, in the Egyptian Labor Market and Panel Surveys of 1998 and 2006. On the one hand, the empirical exercise analyzes the main features of Egyptian females' time allocation relying on both cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis. On the other hand, we estimate a Propensity Score Matching model in order to evaluate the effect of marriage on the female market and domestic labor supplies. Results show that marriage significantly affects both types of work. Married females spend about 8 hours less on market work relative to their single counterparts. And interestingly, marriage as a treatment increases the domestic labor supply by 30 hours on average.
|Date of creation:||Jun 2010|
|Date of revision:||Jun 2010|
|Publication status:||Published by The Economic Research Forum (ERF)|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: 21 Al-Sad Al Aaly St. Dokki, Giza|
Web page: http://www.erf.org.eg
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:erg:wpaper:526. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Namees Nabeel)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.