IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cel/report/54.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Role of Industrial Relations and Social Dialogue in Improving Adult Learning Outcomes and Equity

Author

Listed:
  • Lucia Mýtna Kureková
  • Noah Vangeel
  • Ilse Tobback
  • Ivana Studená
  • Miroslav Štefánik
  • Karolien Lenaerts

Abstract

This paper seeks to empirically assess the relationship between features of industrial relations and social dialogue and adult learning (AL) participation and outcomes in the EU27. It in particular sets out to understand if stronger industrial relations and social dialogue contribute to (i) higher adult learning participation rates, and (ii) more equity in accessing adult learning opportunities by various typically disadvantaged groups. These questions are empirically addressed in this paper by means of descriptive and statistical analyses, using data covering two perspectives: the worker perspective (European Union Labour Force Survey) and the firm perspective (European Company Survey). This data is combined with institutional data measuring industrial relations in the EU, extracted from the OECD-AIAS-ICTWSS dataset. The paper also combines macro-level analysis of broader trends with a micro-level view at the level of firms. Using different datasets and approaches, this working paper confirms a link between the level of social dialogue and the levels of adult learning participation across the EU27. This is an important finding which enlarges the plethora of tools that could be potentially harnessed in improving access to adult learning in the lagging countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucia Mýtna Kureková & Noah Vangeel & Ilse Tobback & Ivana Studená & Miroslav Štefánik & Karolien Lenaerts, 2023. "The Role of Industrial Relations and Social Dialogue in Improving Adult Learning Outcomes and Equity," Research Reports 54, Central European Labour Studies Institute (CELSI).
  • Handle: RePEc:cel:report:54
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://celsi.sk/media/research_reports/RR54.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sean Kennedy & Robert Drago & Judith Sloan & Mark Wooden, 1994. "The Effect of Trade Unions on the Provision of Training: Australian Evidence," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 32(4), pages 565-580, December.
    2. Francis Green & Stephen Machin & David Wilkinson, 1999. "Trade Unions and Training Practices in British Workplaces," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 52(2), pages 179-195, January.
    3. Jens Stegmaier, 2012. "Effects of Works Councils on Firm-Provided Further Training in Germany," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 50(4), pages 667-689, December.
    4. Ljubica Nedelkoska & Glenda Quintini, 2018. "Automation, skills use and training," OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers 202, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Steven McIntosh, 1999. "A Cross-Country Comparison of the Determinants of Vocational Training," CEP Discussion Papers dp0432, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    2. Jason Heyes & Helen Rainbird, 2011. "Bargaining for Training: Converging or Diverging Interests?," Chapters, in: Susan Hayter (ed.), The Role of Collective Bargaining in the Global Economy, chapter 4, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Bratti, Massimiliano & Conti, Maurizio & Sulis, Giovanni, 2019. "Employment Protection and Firm-Provided Training: Quasi-Experimental Evidence from a Labour Market Reform," IZA Discussion Papers 12773, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    4. Erol, Serife & Ahlers, Elke & Schleicher, Sergej, 2021. "Betriebliche Weiterbildung als Handlungsfeld der Betriebsräte," WSI Policy Briefs 51, The Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI), Hans Böckler Foundation.
    5. Kim Hoque & Nicolas Bacon, 2008. "Trade Unions, Union Learning Representatives and Employer‐Provided Training in Britain," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 46(4), pages 702-731, December.
    6. Fabio Berton & Anna Carreri & Francesco Devicienti & Andrea Ricci, 2023. "The collective voice of unions and workplace training in Italy: New insights from mixed methods," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 61(3), pages 595-622, September.
    7. Addison, John T. & Belfield, Clive R., 2004. "Unions, Training, and Firm Performance: Evidence from the British Workplace Employee Relations Survey," IZA Discussion Papers 1264, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    8. Uwe JIRJAHN & Stephen C. SMITH, 2018. "Nonunion Employee Representation: Theory And The German Experience With Mandated Works Councils," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 89(1), pages 201-233, March.
    9. Lütkenhorst, Wilfried, 2018. "Creating wealth without labour? Emerging contours of a new techno-economic landscape," IDOS Discussion Papers 11/2018, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    10. Santana, Monica & Cobo, Manuel J., 2020. "What is the future of work? A science mapping analysis," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 846-862.
    11. Pfeifer, Christian & Janssen, Simon & Yang, Philip & Backes-Gellner, Uschi, 2010. "Training Participation of an Aging Workforce in an Internal Labor Market," Hannover Economic Papers (HEP) dp-447, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät.
    12. Goos, Maarten & Rademakers, Emilie & Röttger, Ronja, 2021. "Routine-Biased technical change: Individual-Level evidence from a plant closure," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(7).
    13. Steffen Mueller & Jens Stegmaier, 2017. "The Dynamic Effects of Works Councils on Labour Productivity: First Evidence from Panel Data," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 55(2), pages 372-395, June.
    14. Montobbio, Fabio & Staccioli, Jacopo & Virgillito, Maria Enrica & Vivarelli, Marco, 2022. "Robots and the origin of their labour-saving impact," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    15. Christian Pfeifer, 2012. "The impact of industrial relations and wage structures on repayment agreements for employer-financed training," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 32(4), pages 3287-3297.
    16. Kaltenberg, Mary & Foster-McGregor, Neil, 2020. "The impact of automation on inequality across Europe," MERIT Working Papers 2020-009, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    17. Zupančič Magda, 2020. "Competency Management, Coordination and Responsibility in Slovenia," Naše gospodarstvo/Our economy, Sciendo, vol. 66(3), pages 36-47, September.
    18. Lingmont, Derek N.J. & Alexiou, Andreas, 2020. "The contingent effect of job automating technology awareness on perceived job insecurity: Exploring the moderating role of organizational culture," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    19. Belloc, Filippo & Burdin, Gabriel & Cattani, Luca & Ellis, William & Landini, Fabio, 2022. "Coevolution of job automation risk and workplace governance," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(3).
    20. Damioli, G. & Van Roy, V. & Vertesy, D. & Vivarelli, M., 2021. "May AI revolution be labour-friendly? Some micro evidence from the supply side," GLO Discussion Paper Series 823, Global Labor Organization (GLO).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cel:report:54. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Martin Kahanec (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/celsisk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.