IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bol/bodewp/wp1223.html

Do High-Stakes Exams Widen Gender Gaps in Early Adolescence? Evidence from a Middle-School Exit Exam Reform

Author

Listed:
  • Annalisa Loviglio
  • Veronica Rattini
  • Federico Stronati

Abstract

Do high-stakes exams widen gender gaps in academic performance? We study this question in early adolescence using Italy's lower-secondary exit exam. A 2017 reform removed the national standardized test from the final grade while preserving the requirement to take the same test, reducing stakes without changing content. Using administrative data on the full population of students and a difference-in-differences design, we compare gender gaps before and after the reform. We find no evidence that higher stakes disadvantage girls. If anything, girls perform slightly better relative to boys when the test has exam stakes, suggesting gender differences under pressure emerge later in education.

Suggested Citation

  • Annalisa Loviglio & Veronica Rattini & Federico Stronati, 2026. "Do High-Stakes Exams Widen Gender Gaps in Early Adolescence? Evidence from a Middle-School Exit Exam Reform," Working Papers wp1223, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
    • Handle: RePEc:bol:bodewp:wp1223
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://amsacta.unibo.it/8960/1/WP1223.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ludger Woessmann, 2016. "The Importance of School Systems: Evidence from International Differences in Student Achievement," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 30(3), pages 3-32, Summer.
    2. Ghazala Azmat & Caterina Calsamiglia & Nagore Iriberri, 2016. "Gender Differences In Response To Big Stakes," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 14(6), pages 1372-1400, December.
    3. Lavy, Victor, 2008. "Do gender stereotypes reduce girls' or boys' human capital outcomes? Evidence from a natural experiment," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(10-11), pages 2083-2105, October.
    4. Eric A Hanushek & Lavinia Kinne & Pietro Sancassaniifo & Ludger Woessmann, 2026. "Patience and Subnational Differences in Human Capital: Regional Analysis with Facebook Interests," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 136(673), pages 335-350.
    5. Catarina Angelo & Ana Balcão Reis, 2021. "Gender gaps in different grading systems," Education Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(1), pages 105-119, January.
    6. Judith M. Delaney & Paul J. Devereux, 2021. "Gender and Educational Achievement: Stylized Facts and Causal Evidence," Working Papers 202103, School of Economics, University College Dublin.
    7. Andreu Arenas & Caterina Calsamiglia, 2025. "Gender Differences in High-Stakes Performance and College Admission Policies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(10), pages 8413-8429, October.
    8. Nagore Iriberri & Pedro Rey-Biel, 2019. "Competitive Pressure Widens the Gender Gap in Performance: Evidence from a Two-stage Competition in Mathematics," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 129(620), pages 1863-1893.
    9. Evren Ors & Frédéric Palomino & Eloïc Peyrache, 2013. "Performance Gender Gap: Does Competition Matter?," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 31(3), pages 443-499.
    10. Calsamiglia, Caterina & Loviglio, Annalisa, 2019. "Grading on a curve: When having good peers is not good," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    11. Bach, Maximilian & Fischer, Mira, 2020. "Understanding the response to high-stakes incentives in primary education," ZEW Discussion Papers 20-066, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    12. Brunello, Giorgio & Kiss, David, 2022. "Math scores in high stakes grades," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    13. Terrier, Camille, 2020. "Boys lag behind: How teachers’ gender biases affect student achievement," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    14. repec:oup:econjl:v:129:y:2019:i:10:p:2916-2948. is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Analia Schlosser & Zvika Neeman & Yigal Attali, 2019. "Differential Performance in High Versus Low Stakes Tests: Evidence from the Gre Test," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 129(623), pages 2916-2948.
    16. De Paola, Maria & Gioia, Francesca, 2016. "Who performs better under time pressure? Results from a field experiment," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 37-53.
    17. Stepan Jurajda & Daniel Munich, 2011. "Gender Gap in Performance under Competitive Pressure: Admissions to Czech Universities," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 101(3), pages 514-518, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arenas, Andreu & Calsamiglia, Caterina & Loviglio, Annalisa, 2021. "What is at stake without high-stakes exams? Students’ evaluation and admission to college at the time of COVID-19," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    2. Devereux, Paul J. & Delaney, Judith, 2021. "Gender and Educational Achievement: Stylized Facts and Causal Evidence," CEPR Discussion Papers 15753, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    3. Arenas, Andreu & Calsamiglia, Caterina, 2022. "Gender Differences in High-Stakes Performance and College Admission Policies," IZA Discussion Papers 15550, IZA Network @ LISER.
    4. Emanuela Macrí & Giuseppe Migali, 2022. "The effect of test anxiety on high stakes exams," Working Papers 365237216, Lancaster University Management School, Economics Department.
    5. Montolio, Daniel & Taberner, Pere A., 2021. "Gender differences under test pressure and their impact on academic performance: A quasi-experimental design," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 1065-1090.
    6. Andreu Arenas & Caterina Calsamiglia, 2025. "Gender Differences in High-Stakes Performance and College Admission Policies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(10), pages 8413-8429, October.
    7. Thomas Buser & Roel Van Veldhuizen & Yang Zhong, 2025. "Time Pressure Preferences," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(3), pages 1909-1924, March.
    8. Graetz, Georg & Karimi, Arizo, 2019. "Explaining gender gap variation across assessment forms," Working Paper Series 2019:8, IFAU - Institute for Evaluation of Labour Market and Education Policy.
    9. Brunello, Giorgio & Kiss, David, 2022. "Math scores in high stakes grades," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    10. Jana Cahlíková & Lubomír Cingl & Ian Levely, 2020. "How Stress Affects Performance and Competitiveness Across Gender," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(8), pages 3295-3310, August.
    11. Alison L. Booth & Patrick Nolen, 2022. "Gender and Psychological Pressure in Competitive Environments: A Laboratory‐based Experiment," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 89(S1), pages 71-85, June.
    12. Hoyer, Britta & van Huizen, Thomas & Keijzer, Linda & Rezaei, Sarah & Rosenkranz, Stephanie & Westbrock, Bastian, 2020. "Gender, competitiveness, and task difficulty: Evidence from the field," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    13. Oliver Cassagneau-Francis & Lindsey Macmillan & Richard Murphy & Gill Wyness, 2025. "Measuring systematic gaps in teacher judgement: A new approach," CEPEO Working Paper Series 25-12, UCL Centre for Education Policy and Equalising Opportunities, revised Jul 2026.
    14. Ferman, Bruno & Fontes, Luiz Felipe, 2022. "Assessing knowledge or classroom behavior? Evidence of teachers’ grading bias," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    15. Huang, Hai & Huang, Wei & Shi, Xinzheng & Zhang, Ming-ang, 2025. "Gender composition, social context, and academic performance in high-stakes examinations," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    16. Angelo Catarina & Reis Ana Balcão, 2025. "Gender Gaps in Different Assessment Systems: The Role of Teacher Gender," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 25(4), pages 1051-1076.
    17. Xiqian Cai & Yi Lu & Jessica Pan & Songfa Zhong, 2019. "Gender Gap under Pressure: Evidence from China's National College Entrance Examination," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 101(2), pages 249-263, May.
    18. Graetz, Georg & Karimi, Arizo, 2022. "Gender gap variation across assessment types: Explanations and implications," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    19. Etienne Dagorn & David Masclet & Thierry Penard, 2022. "The Behavioral Determinants of School Achievement: A Lab in the Field Experiment in Middle School," Economics Working Paper Archive (University of Rennes & University of Caen) 2022-05, Center for Research in Economics and Management (CREM), University of Rennes, University of Caen and CNRS.
    20. Booth, Alison & Lee, Jungmin, 2021. "Girls’ and boys’ performance in competitions: What we can learn from a Korean quiz show," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 431-447.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • I21 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Analysis of Education
    • I24 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Education and Inequality
    • J16 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bol:bodewp:wp1223. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sebolit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.