IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bdp/dpaper/0090.html

Time-use and Income: A Trivariate Relative Poverty Surface

Author

Listed:
  • Franziska Dorn
  • Kim Sarah Meier
  • Simone Maxand

Abstract

Understanding poverty and well-being requires moving beyond income-based measures to account for how work and time are organized within households. While income and unpaid work sustain household living standards, in combination with leisure they determine how these standards are produced and experienced at the individual level, yet the two time dimensions remain largely absent from conventional poverty measurement. To assess living standards and set poverty thresholds we determine a bivariate relative poverty line on the household level and advance this approach to a trivariate poverty surface on the individual level. We base this measure on non-parametric multivariate quantiles. Using the 2018 Mexican National Survey of Household Income and Expenditure reveals substantial deprivation overlooked by income based measures. At the household level, 17.89% are bidimensional poor but located above the univariate thresholds. At the individual level, 26.9% are trivariate poor but above univariate thresholds, with pronounced intersectional differences. Trivariate deprivation is systematically associated with education, age, gender, and ethnicity. The resulting poverty surface further allows us to identify binding constraints and discuss pathways out of poverty in relation to social and ecological sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Franziska Dorn & Kim Sarah Meier & Simone Maxand, 2026. "Time-use and Income: A Trivariate Relative Poverty Surface," Berlin School of Economics Discussion Papers 0090, Berlin School of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:bdp:dpaper:0090
    DOI: 10.48462/opus4-6061
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-hsog/files/6061/BSoE_DP_0090.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.48462/opus4-6061?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdp:dpaper:0090. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christian Reiter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bdpemde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.