IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/ifsowp/331893.html

Time and income poverty: Definitions, thresholds and tradeoffs

Author

Listed:
  • Dorn, Franziska

Abstract

A comprehensive understanding of economic deprivation requires examining income, the value of unpaid household services, and leisure. These concepts can be understood either through subjective utility or objective indicators such as measurable expenditures and time use, and much depends on how they are theorized. Divergent economic theories lead to different methods for estimating the market value of non-market work, which significantly impacts the definitions of household income and time poverty. Most empirical studies of time and income poverty identify deprivation by measuring shortfalls in unpaid household work once minimum thresholds for leisure and paid work are set. These approaches, however, primarily reflect household budget constraints rather than the combined bundle of time and income needed to sustain a standard of living above poverty. To advance poverty measurement, it is essential to examine time and income jointly and recognize their interdependence, as money can buy time, and time can save money. This paper examines the conceptual challenges involved in integrating time and income into a unified framework, including the evaluation of thresholds, the substitutability between time and income, and the valuation of unpaid work. Addressing these issues clarifies how integrated measures of time and income poverty can more accurately capture the resources required for the development of human capabilities.

Suggested Citation

  • Dorn, Franziska, 2025. "Time and income poverty: Definitions, thresholds and tradeoffs," ifso working paper series 58, University of Duisburg-Essen, Institute for Socioeconomics (ifso).
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:ifsowp:331893
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/331893/1/1941743021.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mou Rani Sarker, 2021. "Labor market and unpaid works implications of COVID‐19 for Bangladeshi women," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(S2), pages 597-604, July.
    2. Jooyeoun Suh & Nancy Folbre, 2016. "Valuing Unpaid Child Care in the U.S.: A Prototype Satellite Account Using the American Time Use Survey," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 62(4), pages 668-684, December.
    3. Franziska Dorn & Rosalba Radice & Giampiero Marra & Thomas Kneib, 2024. "A bivariate relative poverty line for leisure time and income poverty: Detecting intersectional differences using distributional copulas," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 70(2), pages 395-419, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aguilar-Gomez, Sandra & Arceo-Gomez, Eva O. & De la Cruz Toledo, Elia, 2026. "Inside the black box of child penalties: Unpaid work and household structure," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    2. Ana Tribin & Karen García-Rojas & Paula Herrera-Idarraga & Leonardo Fabio Morales & Natalia Ramirez-Bustamante, 2023. "Shecession: The Downfall of Colombian Women During the Covid-19 Pandemic," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(4), pages 158-193, October.
    3. Vítor João Pereira Domingues Martinho, 2021. "Impact of Covid‐19 on the convergence of GDP per capita in OECD countries," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(S1), pages 55-72, November.
    4. Vincent Jerald Ramos, 2024. "Extreme Lockdowns and the Gendered Informalization of Employment: Evidence from the Philippines," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 38(5), pages 1197-1222, October.
    5. King, Elizabeth M. & Randolph, Hannah L. & Floro, Maria S. & Suh, Jooyeoun, 2021. "Demographic, health, and economic transitions and the future care burden," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    6. André Cieplinski & Simone D'Alessandro & Chandni Dwarkasing & Pietro Guarnieri, 2022. "Narrowing women’s time and income gaps: an assessment of the synergies between working time reduction and universal income schemes," Working Papers 250, Department of Economics, SOAS University of London, UK, revised Apr 2022.
    7. Nancy Folbre & Marta Murray-Close & Jooyeoun Suh, 2018. "Equivalence scales for extended income in the U.S," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 189-227, June.
    8. Simona Jokubauskaitė & Alyssa Schneebaum, 2022. "Assessing the value of household work based on wages demanded on online platforms for substitutes," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 153-160, March.
    9. Paula Torres-Higuera, 2024. "Warm Days, Warmer Homes? Effects of Temperature Shocks on Time Allocation," Documentos CEDE 21133, Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE.
    10. Layla Branicki & Holly Birkett & Bridgette Sullivan‐Taylor, 2023. "Gender and resilience at work: A critical introduction," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 129-134, January.
    11. Erica Aloè, 2023. "Time and Income Poverty Measurement. An Ongoing Debate on the Inclusion of Time in Poverty Assessment," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 169(1), pages 283-322, September.
    12. Günseli BERIK, 2020. "Measuring what matters and guiding policy: An evaluation of the Genuine Progress Indicator," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 159(1), pages 71-94, March.
    13. Yosra AleAhmad, 2023. "We are both women and Kurd: An intersectional analysis of female Kolbars challenges in Iranian Kurdistan amid the COVID crisis," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(3), pages 1104-1123, May.
    14. Lazarus, Elias & Brown, Clair, 2022. "Improving the genuine progress indicator to measure comparable net welfare: U.S. and California, 1995–2017," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    15. M. A. Baqui Khalily & Mohammed Jamal Uddin & Tunazzina Sultana & Naim Uddin Hasan Awrangajeb Chy & Zapan Barua, 2023. "Coping with the economic effects of COVID-19: an evidence from the Bangladesh labour market," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 3(7), pages 1-26, July.
    16. David E. Bloom & Alex Khoury & Eda Algur & J. P. Sevilla, 2020. "Valuing Productive Non-market Activities of Older Adults in Europe and the US," De Economist, Springer, vol. 168(2), pages 153-181, June.
    17. Nancy Folbre, 2024. "Care Data Infrastructure: A U.S. Case Study," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 70(1), pages 239-250, March.
    18. GÁL, Róbert Iván & VANHUYSSE, Pieter & MEDGYESI, Márton, 2023. "Taxing Reproduction : The Invisible Transfer Cost of Rearing Children in Europe," CEI Working Paper Series 2023-04, Center for Economic Institutions, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    19. Jooyeoun Suh & Changa Dorji & Valerie Mercer-Blackman & Aimee Hampel-Milagrosa, 2020. "Valuing Unpaid Care Work in Bhutan," ADB Economics Working Paper Series 624, Asian Development Bank.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:ifsowp:331893. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/isduede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.