IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/azt/cemmap/41-15.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Finite sample bias corrected IV estimation for weak and many instruments

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew C. Harding
  • Jerry Hausman
  • Christopher Palmer

Abstract

This paper considers the finite sample distribution of the 2SLS estimator and derives bounds on its exact bias in the presence of weak and/or many instruments. We then contrast the behavior of the exact bias expressions and the asymptotic expansions currently popular in the literature, including a consideration of the no-moment problem exhibited by many Nagar-type estimators. After deriving a finite sample unbiased k-class estimator, we introduce a double k-class estimator based on Nagar (1962) that dominates k-class estimators (including 2SLS), especially in the cases of weak and/or many instruments. We demonstrate these properties in Monte Carlo simulations showing that our preferred estimators outperforms Fuller (1977) estimators in terms of mean bias and MSE.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew C. Harding & Jerry Hausman & Christopher Palmer, 2015. "Finite sample bias corrected IV estimation for weak and many instruments," CeMMAP working papers 41/15, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    • Handle: RePEc:azt:cemmap:41/15
    DOI: 10.1920/wp.cem.2015.4115
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cemmap.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/CWP4115.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1920/wp.cem.2015.4115?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Isaiah Andrews & Timothy B. Armstrong, 2017. "Unbiased instrumental variables estimation under known first‐stage sign," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 8(2), pages 479-503, July.
    2. Hillier, Grant H & Kinal, Terrence W & Srivastava, V K, 1984. "On the Moments of Ordinary Least Squares and Instrumental Variables Estimators in a General Structural Equation," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 52(1), pages 185-202, January.
    3. Chao, John & Swanson, Norman R., 2007. "Alternative approximations of the bias and MSE of the IV estimator under weak identification with an application to bias correction," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 137(2), pages 515-555, April.
    4. Ullah, Aman, 2004. "Finite Sample Econometrics," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198774488.
    5. Phillips, P C B, 1980. "The Exact Distribution of Instrumental Variable Estimators in an Equation Containing n + 1 Endogenous Variables," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 48(4), pages 861-878, May.
    6. Karim Abadir, 1999. "An introduction to hypergeometric functions for economists," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3), pages 287-330.
    7. Richardson, David H & Wu, De-Min, 1971. "A Note on the Comparison of Ordinary and Two-Stage Least Squares Estimators," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 39(6), pages 973-981, November.
    8. Dwivedi, T. D. & Srivastava, V. K., 1984. "Exact finite sample properties of double k-class estimators in simultaneous equations," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 263-283, July.
    9. Owen, A D, 1976. "A Proof That Both the Bias and the Mean Square Error of the Two-Stage Least Squares Estimator Are Monotonically Non-Increasing Functions of Sample Size," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 44(2), pages 409-411, March.
    10. Hansen, Christian & Hausman, Jerry & Newey, Whitney, 2008. "Estimation With Many Instrumental Variables," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 26, pages 398-422.
    11. Srinivasan, T N, 1970. "Approximations to Finite Sample Moments of Estimators Whose Exact Sampling Distributions are Unknown," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 38(3), pages 533-541, May.
    12. Fuller, Wayne A, 1977. "Some Properties of a Modification of the Limited Information Estimator," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 45(4), pages 939-953, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matthew C. Harding & Jerry Hausman & Christopher Palmer, 2015. "Finite sample bias corrected IV estimation for weak and many instruments," CeMMAP working papers CWP41/15, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    2. Yong Bao & Aman Ullah, 2021. "Analytical Finite Sample Econometrics: From A. L. Nagar to Now," Journal of Quantitative Economics, Springer;The Indian Econometric Society (TIES), vol. 19(1), pages 17-37, December.
    3. Emma M. Iglesias & Garry D. A. Phillips, 2012. "Almost Unbiased Estimation in Simultaneous Equation Models With Strong and/or Weak Instruments," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(4), pages 505-520, June.
    4. Christopher L. Skeels & Frank Windmeijer, 2018. "On the Stock–Yogo Tables," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-23, November.
    5. Yukitoshi Matsushita & Taisuke Otsu, 2020. "Second-order refinements for t-ratios with many instruments," STICERD - Econometrics Paper Series 612, Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines, LSE.
    6. Cheung Ip, Wai & Phillips, Garry D. A., 1998. "The non-monotonicity of the bias and mean squared error of the two stage least squares estimators of exogenous variable coefficients," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 60(3), pages 303-310, September.
    7. Matsushita, Yukitoshi & Otsu, Taisuke, 2023. "Second-order refinements for t-ratios with many instruments," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 232(2), pages 346-366.
    8. Matsushita, Yukitoshi & Otsu, Taisuke, 2023. "Second-order refinements for t-ratios with many instruments," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 111065, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    9. A. Belloni & D. Chen & V. Chernozhukov & C. Hansen, 2012. "Sparse Models and Methods for Optimal Instruments With an Application to Eminent Domain," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 80(6), pages 2369-2429, November.
    10. Hausman, Jerry & Lewis, Randall & Menzel, Konrad & Newey, Whitney, 2011. "Properties of the CUE estimator and a modification with moments," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 165(1), pages 45-57.
    11. Michal Kolesár, 2013. "Estimation in an Instrumental Variables Model With Treatment Effect Heterogeneity," Working Papers 2013-2, Princeton University. Economics Department..
    12. Iglesias Emma M., 2011. "Constrained k-class Estimators in the Presence of Weak Instruments," Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, De Gruyter, vol. 15(4), pages 1-13, September.
    13. Matsushita, Yukitoshi & Otsu, Taisuke, 2022. "A jackknife Lagrange multiplier test with many weak instruments," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 116392, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    14. Michael Keane & Timothy Neal, 2021. "A Practical Guide to Weak Instruments," Discussion Papers 2021-05b, School of Economics, The University of New South Wales.
    15. Keisuke Hirano & Jack R. Porter, 2015. "Location Properties of Point Estimators in Linear Instrumental Variables and Related Models," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(6-10), pages 720-733, December.
    16. Chuanming Gao & Kajal Lahiri, 2019. "A Comparison of Some Bayesian and Classical Procedures for Simultaneous Equation Models with Weak Instruments," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-28, July.
    17. Fernanda Peixe & Alastair Hall & Kostas Kyriakoulis, 2006. "The Mean Squared Error of the Instrumental Variables Estimator When the Disturbance Has an Elliptical Distribution," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 117-138.
    18. Stephen Knowles & P. Dorian Owen, 2010. "Which Institutions are Good for Your Health? The Deep Determinants of Comparative Cross-country Health Status," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(4), pages 701-723.
    19. Marine Carrasco & Guy Tchuente, 2016. "Efficient Estimation with Many Weak Instruments Using Regularization Techniques," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(8-10), pages 1609-1637, December.
    20. Skeels, Christopher L. & Taylor, Larry W., 1995. "On a simultaneous equations pre-test estimator," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 269-286, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:azt:cemmap:41/15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dermot Watson (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifsssuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.