Donors Change Both Their Level and Pattern of Giving in Response to Contests among Charities
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Other versions of this item:
- Deck, Cary & Murphy, James J., 2019. "Donors change both their level and pattern of giving in response to contests among charities," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 91-106.
References listed on IDEAS
- Hoffman Elizabeth & McCabe Kevin & Shachat Keith & Smith Vernon, 1994. "Preferences, Property Rights, and Anonymity in Bargaining Games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 7(3), pages 346-380, November.
- Steffen Huck & Imran Rasul & Andrew Shephard, 2015.
"Comparing Charitable Fundraising Schemes: Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment and a Structural Model,"
American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 7(2), pages 326-369, May.
- Huck, Steffen & Rasul, Imran & Shephard, Andrew, 2013. "Comparing charitable fundraising schemes: Evidence from a natural field experiment and a structural model," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Economics of Change SP II 2012-303r, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
- Huck, Steffen & Rasul, Imran & Shephard, Andrew, 2013. "Comparing Charitable Fundraising Schemes: Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment and a Structural Model," CEPR Discussion Papers 9648, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Adriaan Soetevent, 2005. "Anonymity in giving in a natural context-a field experiment in thirty churches," Framed Field Experiments 00198, The Field Experiments Website.
- Amihai Glazer & Kai A. Konrad, 2008.
"A Signaling Explanation for Charity,"
Springer Books, in: Roger D. Congleton & Kai A. Konrad & Arye L. Hillman (ed.), 40 Years of Research on Rent Seeking 2, pages 713-722,
Springer.
- Glazer, Amihai & Konrad, Kai A, 1996. "A Signaling Explanation for Charity," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 86(4), pages 1019-1028, September.
- Adena, Maja & Huck, Steffen, 2017.
"Matching donations without crowding out? Some theoretical considerations, a field, and a lab experiment,"
Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 32-42.
- Adena, Maja & Huck, Steffen, 2016. "Matching donations without crowding out? Some theoretical considerations, a field, and a lab experiment," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Economics of Change SP II 2015-302r, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
- Kimberley Scharf & Sarah Smith & Mark Ottoni-Wilhelm, 2022.
"Lift and Shift: The Effect of Fundraising Interventions in Charity Space and Time,"
American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 14(3), pages 296-321, August.
- Kimberley Ann Scharf & Sarah Smith & Mark Ottoni-Wilhelm, 2017. "Lift and Shift: The Effect of Fundraising Interventions in Charity Space and Time," CESifo Working Paper Series 6694, CESifo.
- Smith, Sarah & Scharf, Kimberley & Wilhelm, Mark, 2017. "Lift and Shift: The Effect of Fundraising Interventions in Charity Space and Time," CEPR Discussion Papers 12338, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Scharf, Kimberley & Smith, Sarah & Ottoni-Wilhelm, Mark, 2017. "Lift and Shift: The Effect of Fundraising Interventions in Charity Space and Time," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 343, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
- Kimberley Scharf & Sarah Smith & Mark Ottoni-Wilhelm, 2017. "Lift and Shift: The Effect of Fundraising Interventions in Charity Space and Time," Bristol Economics Discussion Papers 17/687, School of Economics, University of Bristol, UK.
- Sarah Smith & Kimberley Scharf & Mark Ottoni-Wilhelm, 2017. "Lift and shift: the effect of fundraising interventions in charity space and time," IFS Working Papers W17/20, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
- Bracha, Anat & Menietti, Michael & Vesterlund, Lise, 2011.
"Seeds to succeed?: Sequential giving to public projects,"
Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(5-6), pages 416-427, June.
- Anat Bracha & Michael Menietti & Lise Vesterlund, "undated". "Seeds to succeed? Sequential giving to public projects," Working Paper 126976, Harvard University OpenScholar.
- Anat Bracha & Michael Menietti & Lise Vesterlund, 2009. "Seeds to succeed: sequential giving to public projects," Working Papers 09-21, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
- Catherine C. Eckel & Philip J. Grossman, 2006.
"Do Donors Care about Subsidy Type? An Experimental Study,"
Research in Experimental Economics, in: Experiments Investigating Fundraising and Charitable Contributors, pages 157-175,
Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
- Catherine C. Eckel & Philip J. Grossman, 2006. "Do Donors Care about Subsidy Type? An Experimental Study," Monash Economics Working Papers archive-10, Monash University, Department of Economics.
- Dean Karlan & John A. List, 2007.
"Does Price Matter in Charitable Giving? Evidence from a Large-Scale Natural Field Experiment,"
American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 97(5), pages 1774-1793, December.
- Dean Karlan & John A. List, 2006. "Does Price Matter in Charitable Giving? Evidence From a Large-Scale Natural Field Experiment," NBER Working Papers 12338, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Dean Karlan & John A. List, 2006. "Does Price Matter in Charitable Giving? Evidence from a Large-Scale Natural Field Experiment," Working Papers 1, The Field Experiments Website.
- Karlan, Dean & List, John, 2006. "Does Price Matter in Charitable Giving? Evidence from a Large-Scale Natural Field Experiment," Working Papers 13, Yale University, Department of Economics.
- Dean Karlan & John List, 2006. "Does price matter in charitable giving? Evidence from a large-scale natural field experiment," Natural Field Experiments 00279, The Field Experiments Website.
- Malcolm Kass & Enrique Fatas & Catherine Eckel & Daniel Arce, 2015. "The UN in the lab," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 45(3), pages 625-651, October.
- Huck, Steffen & Rasul, Imran, 2011.
"Matched fundraising: Evidence from a natural field experiment,"
Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(5-6), pages 351-362, June.
- Huck, Steffen & Rasul, Imran, 2011. "Matched fundraising: Evidence from a natural field experiment," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(5), pages 351-362.
- Huck, Steffen & Rasul, Imran, 2010. "Matched Fundraising: Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment," IZA Discussion Papers 5267, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Huck, Steffen & Rasul, Imran, 2010. "Matched Fundraising: Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment," CEPR Discussion Papers 8075, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Douglas Davis & Edward Millner & Robert Reilly, 2005. "Subsidy Schemes and Charitable Contributions: A Closer Look," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 8(2), pages 85-106, June.
- Catherine C. Eckel & Philip J. Grossman, 2006. "Subsidizing Charitable Giving with Rebates or Matching: Further Laboratory Evidence," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 72(4), pages 794-807, April.
- Henrik Orzen, 2005.
"Fundraising through Competition: Evidence from the Lab,"
Discussion Papers
2005-04, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
- Henrik Orzen, 2008. "Fundraising through Competition: Evidence from the Lab," Discussion Papers 2008-11, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
- Rachel Croson & Jen Shang, 2008.
"The impact of downward social information on contribution decisions,"
Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 11(3), pages 221-233, September.
- Rachel Croson & Jen Shang, 2008. "The impact of downward social information on contribution decisions," Natural Field Experiments 00322, The Field Experiments Website.
- Douglas D. Davis & Edward L. Millner, 2005. "Rebates, Matches, and Consumer Behavior," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 72(2), pages 410-421, October.
- Donald J. Dale, 2004. "Charitable Lottery Structure and Fund Raising: Theory and Evidence," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 7(3), pages 217-234, October.
- Bruno S. Frey & Stephan Meier, 2004.
"Social Comparisons and Pro-social Behavior: Testing "Conditional Cooperation" in a Field Experiment,"
American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 94(5), pages 1717-1722, December.
- Bruno S. Frey & Stephan Meier, "undated". "Social Comparisons and Pro-social Behavior - Testing "Conditional Cooperation" in a Field Experiment," IEW - Working Papers 162, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics - University of Zurich.
- Foster, Joshua, 2020. "Loss aversion and sunk cost sensitivity in all-pay auctions for charity: Theory and experiments," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
- Catherine Eckel & Philip Grossman, 2008. "Subsidizing charitable contributions: a natural field experiment comparing matching and rebate subsidies," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 11(3), pages 234-252, September.
- Arthur J.H.C. Schram & Sander Onderstal, 2009. "Bidding To Give: An Experimental Comparison Of Auctions For Charity," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 50(2), pages 431-457, May.
- R. Mark Isaac & James M. Walker, 1988.
"Group Size Effects in Public Goods Provision: The Voluntary Contributions Mechanism,"
The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 103(1), pages 179-199.
- R. M. Isaac & J. M. Walker, 2010. "Group size effects in public goods provision: The voluntary contribution mechanism," Levine's Working Paper Archive 310, David K. Levine.
- John A. List & David Lucking-Reiley, 2002.
"The Effects of Seed Money and Refunds on Charitable Giving: Experimental Evidence from a University Capital Campaign,"
Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 110(1), pages 215-233, February.
- John A. List & David Lucking-Reiley, 2000. "The Effects of Seed Money and Refunds on Charitable Giving: Experimental Evidence from a University Capital Campaign," Vanderbilt University Department of Economics Working Papers 0008, Vanderbilt University Department of Economics.
- John List & David Lucking-Reiley, 2002. "The effects of seed money and refunds on charitable giving: Experimental evidence from a university capital campaign," Natural Field Experiments 00301, The Field Experiments Website.
- Jingping Li & Yohanes E. Riyanto, 2017.
"Category Reporting In Charitable Giving: An Experimental Analysis,"
Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 55(1), pages 397-408, January.
- Li, Jingping & Riyanto, Yohanes E., 2009. "Category Reporting in Charitable Giving: An Experimental Analysis," MPRA Paper 18414, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Jeffrey Carpenter & Jessica Holmes & PeterHans Matthews, 2008.
"Charity auctions: a field experiment,"
Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 118(525), pages 92-113, January.
- Jeffrey Carpenter & Jessica Holmes & Peter Hans Matthews, 2008. "Charity auctions: a field experiment," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 118(525), pages 92-113, January.
- Reinstein David A, 2011. "Does One Charitable Contribution Come at the Expense of Another?," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 11(1), pages 1-54, June.
- Jen Shang & Rachel Croson, 2009.
"A Field Experiment in Charitable Contribution: The Impact of Social Information on the Voluntary Provision of Public Goods,"
Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 119(540), pages 1422-1439, October.
- Jen Shang & Rachel Croson, 2009. "A Field Experiment in Charitable Contribution: The Impact of Social Information on the Voluntary Provision of Public Goods," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 119(540), pages 1422-1439, October.
- Brown, Alexander L. & Meer, Jonathan & Williams, J. Forrest, 2017.
"Social distance and quality ratings in charity choice,"
Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 9-15.
- Alexander L. Brown & Jonathan Meer & J. Forrest Williams, 2014. "Social Distance and Quality Ratings in Charity Choice," NBER Working Papers 20182, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- James J. Murphy & Nomin Batmunkh & Benjamin Nilsson & Samantha Ray, 2015.
"The Impact of Social Information on the Voluntary Provision of Public Goods: A Replication Study,"
Research in Experimental Economics, in: Replication in Experimental Economics, volume 18, pages 41-50,
Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
- James J. Murphy & Nomin Batmunkh & Ben Nilsson & Samantha Ray, 2015. "The Impact of Social Information on the Voluntary Provision of Public Goods: A Replication Study," Working Papers 15-08, Chapman University, Economic Science Institute.
- James J. Murphy & Nomin Batmunkh & Benjamin Nilsson & Samantha Ray, 2015. "The Impact of Social Information on the Voluntary Provision of Public Goods: A Replication Study," Working Papers 2014-02, University of Alaska Anchorage, Department of Economics.
- Meer, Jonathan, 2017.
"Does fundraising create new giving?,"
Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 82-93.
- Jonathan Meer, 2016. "Does Fundraising Create New Giving?," NBER Working Papers 22033, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Emmanuel Dechenaux & Dan Kovenock & Roman Sheremeta, 2015.
"A survey of experimental research on contests, all-pay auctions and tournaments,"
Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 18(4), pages 609-669, December.
- Emmanuel Dechenaux & Dan Kovenock & Roman Sheremeta, 2012. "A Survey of Experimental Research on Contests, All-Pay Auctions and Tournaments," Working Papers 12-22, Chapman University, Economic Science Institute.
- Dechenaux, Emmanuel & Kovenock, Dan & Sheremeta, Roman, 2014. "A Survey of Experimental Research on Contests, All-Pay Auctions and Tournaments," MPRA Paper 59714, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Dechenaux, Emmanuel & Kovenock, Dan & Sheremeta, Roman M., 2012. "A survey of experimental research on contests, all-pay auctions and tournaments," Discussion Papers, Research Professorship & Project "The Future of Fiscal Federalism" SP II 2012-109, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
- Eckel, Catherine C. & Grossman, Philip J., 2003. "Rebate versus matching: does how we subsidize charitable contributions matter?," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(3-4), pages 681-701, March.
- Bruno Frey & Stephan Meier, 2004. "In a field experiment," Natural Field Experiments 00243, The Field Experiments Website.
- Emel Filiz-Ozbay & Neslihan Uler, 2019. "Demand for Giving to Multiple Charities: An Experimental Study," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 17(3), pages 725-753.
- Davis, Douglas D., 2006.
"Rebate subsidies, matching subsidies and isolation effects,"
Judgment and Decision Making, Cambridge University Press, vol. 1(1), pages 13-22, July.
- Douglas D. Davis, 2006. "Rebate Subsidies, Matching Subsidies and Isolation Effects," Working Papers 0604, VCU School of Business, Department of Economics.
- repec:cup:judgdm:v:1:y:2006:i::p:13-22 is not listed on IDEAS
- Soetevent, Adriaan R., 2005. "Anonymity in giving in a natural context--a field experiment in 30 churches," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(11-12), pages 2301-2323, December.
- Bracha, Anat & Menietti, Michael & Vesterlund, Lise, 2011. "Seeds to succeed?," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(5), pages 416-427.
- Vernon L. Smith, 1994. "Economics in the Laboratory," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 8(1), pages 113-131, Winter.
- James Andreoni & John Miller, 2002. "Giving According to GARP: An Experimental Test of the Consistency of Preferences for Altruism," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 70(2), pages 737-753, March.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Gallier, Carlo & Goeschl, Timo & Kesternich, Martin & Lohse, Johannes & Reif, Christiane & Römer, Daniel, 2023.
"Inter-charity competition under spatial differentiation: Sorting, crowding, and spillovers,"
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 457-468.
- Gallier, Carlo & Goeschl, Timo & Kesternich, Martin & Lohse, Johannes & Reif, Christiane & Römer, Daniel, 2019. "Inter-charity competition under spatial differentiation: Sorting, crowding, and spillovers," ZEW Discussion Papers 19-039, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
- Carlo Gallier & Timo Goeschl & Martin Kesternich & Johannes Lohse & Christiane Reif & Daniel Roemer, 2019. "Inter-charity competition under spatial differentiation: Sorting, crowding, and splillovers," Discussion Papers 19-08, Department of Economics, University of Birmingham.
- Tatyana Deryugina & Benjamin M. Marx, 2021.
"Is the Supply of Charitable Donations Fixed? Evidence from Deadly Tornadoes,"
American Economic Review: Insights, American Economic Association, vol. 3(3), pages 383-398, September.
- Tatyana Deryugina & Benjamin M. Marx, 2020. "Is the Supply of Charitable Donations Fixed? Evidence from Deadly Tornadoes," NBER Working Papers 27078, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Jan Schmitz, 2021. "Is Charitable Giving a Zero-Sum Game? The Effect of Competition Between Charities on Giving Behavior," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(10), pages 6333-6349, October.
- Zhiyuan Gao & Zhiling Guo & Qian Tang, 2022. "How do monetary incentives influence giving? An empirical investigation of matching subsidies on kiva," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 303-324, June.
- Eckel, Catherine & Guney, Begum & Uler, Neslihan, 2020. "Independent vs. Coordinated Fundraising: Understanding the Role of Information," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
- Livingston, Jeffrey A. & Rasulmukhamedov, Rustam, 2023. "On the Interpretation of Giving in Dictator Games When the Recipient is a Charity," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 275-285.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Gallier, Carlo & Goeschl, Timo & Kesternich, Martin & Lohse, Johannes & Reif, Christiane & Römer, Daniel, 2023.
"Inter-charity competition under spatial differentiation: Sorting, crowding, and spillovers,"
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 457-468.
- Gallier, Carlo & Goeschl, Timo & Kesternich, Martin & Lohse, Johannes & Reif, Christiane & Römer, Daniel, 2019. "Inter-charity competition under spatial differentiation: Sorting, crowding, and spillovers," ZEW Discussion Papers 19-039, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
- Carlo Gallier & Timo Goeschl & Martin Kesternich & Johannes Lohse & Christiane Reif & Daniel Roemer, 2019. "Inter-charity competition under spatial differentiation: Sorting, crowding, and splillovers," Discussion Papers 19-08, Department of Economics, University of Birmingham.
- Krasteva, Silvana & Saboury, Piruz, 2021. "Informative fundraising: The signaling value of seed money and matching gifts," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
- Saboury, Piruz & Krasteva, Silvana & Palma, Marco A., 2022. "The effect of seed money and matching gifts in fundraising: A lab experiment," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 425-453.
- Edwards, James T. & List, John A., 2014.
"Toward an understanding of why suggestions work in charitable fundraising: Theory and evidence from a natural field experiment,"
Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-13.
- James Edwards & John List, 2013. "Toward an Understanding of why Suggestions Work in Charitable Fundraising: Theory and Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment," Natural Field Experiments 00462, The Field Experiments Website.
- James T. Edwards & John A. List, 2013. "Toward an Understanding of why Suggestions Work in Charitable Fundraising: Theory and Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment," CESifo Working Paper Series 4531, CESifo.
- James T. Edwards & John A. List, 2013. "Toward an Understanding of why Suggestions Work in Charitable Fundraising: Theory and Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment," NBER Working Papers 19665, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Jan Schmitz, 2021. "Is Charitable Giving a Zero-Sum Game? The Effect of Competition Between Charities on Giving Behavior," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(10), pages 6333-6349, October.
- Indranil Goswami & Indranil Goswami, 2020. "No Substitute for the Real Thing: The Importance of In-Context Field Experiments in Fundraising," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(6), pages 1052-1070, November.
- Shusaku Sasaki & Hirofumi Kurokawa & Fumio Ohtake, 2022. "An experimental comparison of rebate and matching in charitable giving: The case of Japan," The Japanese Economic Review, Springer, vol. 73(1), pages 147-177, January.
- Onderstal, Sander & Schram, Arthur J.H.C. & Soetevent, Adriaan R., 2013. "Bidding to give in the field," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 72-85.
- John A. List & James J. Murphy & Michael K. Price & Alexander G. James, 2019.
"Do Appeals to Donor Benefits Raise More Money than Appeals to Recipient Benefits? Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment with Pick.Click.Give,"
NBER Working Papers
26559, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- John A. List & James J. Murphy & Michael K. Price & Alexander G. James, 2019. "Do Appeals to Donor Benefits Raise More Money than Appeals to Recipient Benefits? Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment with Pick.Click.Give," Working Papers 19-31, Chapman University, Economic Science Institute.
- Alexander James & John List & James Murphy & Michael Price, 2019. "Do Appeals to Donor Benefits Raise More Money than Appeals to Recipient Benefits? Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment with Pick.Click.Give," Natural Field Experiments 00682, The Field Experiments Website.
- John List & James Murphy & Michael Price & Alexander James, 2019. "Do Appeals to Donor Benefits Raise More Money than Appeals to Recipient Benefits? Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment with Pick.Click.Give," Working Papers 2019-07, University of Alaska Anchorage, Department of Economics.
- Onderstal, Sander & Schram, Arthur J.H.C. & Soetevent, Adriaan R., 2014. "Reprint of: Bidding to give in the field," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 87-100.
- Indranil Goswami & Oleg Urminsky, 2018. "No Substitute for the Real Thing: The Importance of In-Context Field Experiments In Fundraising," Natural Field Experiments 00660, The Field Experiments Website.
- Castillo, Marco & Petrie, Ragan, 2020. "Optimal Incentives to Give," IZA Discussion Papers 13321, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Drouvelis, Michalis & Marx, Benjamin M., 2022.
"Can charitable appeals identify and exploit belief heterogeneity?,"
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 631-649.
- Michalis Drouvelis & Benjamin M. Marx, 2021. "Can Charitable Appeals Identify and Exploit Belief Heterogeneity?," CESifo Working Paper Series 8855, CESifo.
- Roman M. Sheremeta & Neslihan Uler, 2021.
"The impact of taxes and wasteful government spending on giving,"
Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 24(2), pages 355-386, June.
- Roman M. Sheremeta & Neslihan Uler, 2016. "The Impact of Taxes and Wasteful Government Spending on Giving," Working Papers 16-07, Chapman University, Economic Science Institute.
- Roman M. Sheremeta & Neslihan Uler, 2020. "The Impact of Taxes and Wasteful Government Spending on Giving," Working Papers 20-32, Chapman University, Economic Science Institute.
- Sheremeta, Roman & Uler, Neslihan, 2020. "The Impact of Taxes and Wasteful Government Spending on Giving," MPRA Paper 102348, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Sheremeta, Roman & Uler, Neslihan, 2016. "The Impact of Taxes and Wasteful Government Spending on Giving," MPRA Paper 71001, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Adena, Maja, 2021. "How can we improve tax incentives for charitable giving? Lessons from field experiments in fundraising," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 344-353.
- Eckel, Catherine & Grossman, Philip J., 2017. "Comparing rebate and matching subsidies controlling for donors’ awareness: Evidence from the field," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 88-95.
- Sánchez, Ángela, 2022. "Group identity and charitable contributions: Experimental evidence," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 542-549.
- Neslihan Uler, 2011. "Public goods provision, inequality and taxes," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 14(3), pages 287-306, September.
- Huck, Steffen & Rasul, Imran, 2011.
"Matched fundraising: Evidence from a natural field experiment,"
Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(5-6), pages 351-362, June.
- Huck, Steffen & Rasul, Imran, 2011. "Matched fundraising: Evidence from a natural field experiment," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(5), pages 351-362.
- Huck, Steffen & Rasul, Imran, 2010. "Matched Fundraising: Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment," CEPR Discussion Papers 8075, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Huck, Steffen & Rasul, Imran, 2010. "Matched Fundraising: Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment," IZA Discussion Papers 5267, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Diederich, Johannes & Eckel, Catherine C. & Epperson, Raphael & Goeschl, Timo & Grossman, Philip J., 2019. "Subsidizing Quantity Donations: Matches, Rebates, and Discounts Compared," VfS Annual Conference 2019 (Leipzig): 30 Years after the Fall of the Berlin Wall - Democracy and Market Economy 203650, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
More about this item
Keywords
experimental economics; Charitable Giving; Contests; All-pay Auction; Donation Matching; Laboratory Experiment; philanthropy;All these keywords.
JEL classification:
- C9 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments
- D6 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics
- D7 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making
- D9 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics
- L3 - Industrial Organization - - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise
- H4 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods
NEP fields
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:- NEP-DES-2019-09-16 (Economic Design)
- NEP-EXP-2019-09-16 (Experimental Economics)
Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ala:wpaper:2018-06. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jonathan Alevy (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ecuaaus.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.