IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Akzeptanz von Informationssystemen durch Schweinemäster: Eine Kausalanalyse

Listed author(s):
  • Arens, Ludwig
  • Plumeyer, Cord-Herwig
  • Theuvsen, Ludwig
Registered author(s):

    Im Zuge der Anstrengungen, die Verunsicherung der Verbraucher zu beheben, wird auf vielfältige Weise versucht, die Sicherheit von Lebensmitteln zu verbessern. Dabei ist auch der Informationsaustausch zwischen Akteuren in den Wertschöpfungsketten der Agrar- und Ernährungswirtschaft in den Fokus gesetzgeberischer wie auch privater Initiativen gerückt. Neben technologischen Hindernissen, vor allem der fehlenden Kompatibilität von Informationssystemen, lassen sich auch Verhaltensaspekte als Hemmnisse des Informationsaustauschs und der Informationsverarbeitung identifizieren. Das Ziel dieses Beitrags ist es vor diesem Hintergrund, am Beispiel des Tiergesundheitsmanagements in der Schweinefleischwirtschaft Antworten auf die Frage zu geben, welche Einflussgrößen auf die Akzeptanz von computerbasierten Informationssystemen wirken. In einer auf der Grundlage der “Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology” konzipierten empirischen Studie zeigte sich, dass die Verhaltensintention der Akteure signifikant von ihrer Leistungserwartung beeinflusst wird. Das Nutzungsverhalten der Landwirte in Bezug auf Informationssysteme hängt unmittelbar von der Verhaltensintention und erleichternden Rahmenbedingungen ab. Mittelbare Einflüsse auf das Nutzungsverhalten gehen von Alter, Geschlecht, Erfahrung und Motivation der Probanden aus. Die Ergebnisse haben interessante Implikationen für die am Informationsaustausch interessierten Wertschöpfungspartner wie auch Systemanbieter. Politics and business have worked to alleviate consumer insecurity concerning food safety through manifold efforts aimed at improving the quality of food products. In this context the exchange of information between supply chain partners has increasingly gained the attention of lawmakers and private initiatives. Besides technological difficulties, such as a lack of compatibility among interfaces of informational systems, behavioral aspects are identified as hindrances to the exchange and processing of information. Against this background, the goal of this study is to gain initial insight into the determinants of hog farmers’ acceptance of computer- based information systems. An empirical study based on the “Unified Theory of acceptance and Use of Technology” showed that actors’ intention to use is significantly influenced by their performance expectancy. Farmers’ use behavior with regard to information systems is determined by their behavioral intention and facilitating conditions. Age, gender, experience and motivtion have indirect effects on farmers’ use behavior. The results have interesting implications for supply chain partners interested in fostering information exchange and IT system providers.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA) in its series 51st Annual Conference, Halle, Germany, September 28-30, 2011 with number 114482.

    in new window

    Date of creation: 2011
    Handle: RePEc:ags:gewi11:114482
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    Bundesallee 50, 38116 Braunschweig

    Phone: 0531 / 596 5501
    Fax: 0531 / 596 5599
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    in new window

    1. Briggeman, Brian C. & Whitacre, Brian E., 2010. "Farming and the Internet: Reasons for Non-Use," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 39(3), October.
    2. Smith, Aaron D. & Goe, W. Richard & Kemey, Martin & Morrison Paul, Catherine J., 2004. "Computer and Internet Use by Great Plains Farmers," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 29(03), December.
    3. Foster, Andrew D & Rosenzweig, Mark R, 1995. "Learning by Doing and Learning from Others: Human Capital and Technical Change in Agriculture," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 103(6), pages 1176-1209, December.
    4. Hoag, Dana L. & Ascough, James C. & Frasier, W. Marshall, 1999. "Farm Computer Adoption in the Great Plains," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 31(01), pages 57-67, April.
    5. Hoag, Dana L. & Ascough, James C. & Frasier, W. Marshall, 1999. "Farm Computer Adoption In The Great Plains," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 31(01), April.
    6. Briggeman, Brian C. & Whitacre, Brian E., 2010. "Farming and the Internet: Reasons for Non-Use," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 39(03), pages 571-584, October.
    7. Gloy, Brent A. & Akridge, Jay T., 2000. "Computer And Internet Adoption On Large U.S. Farms," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association (IFAMA), vol. 3(03).
    8. Viswanath Venkatesh & Fred D. Davis, 2000. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 186-204, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:gewi11:114482. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.