IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

The Effects Of The International Smallgroup And Tree Planting Program On Household Income In Nyeri District, Kenya

Listed author(s):
  • Kinuthia, Emmanuel K.
Registered author(s):

    Household poverty and food insecurity in Kenya is a major challenge especially in rural areas. The situation has been exacerbated by poor economic performance, nationwide drought and the global financial crisis. Nevertheless, numerous efforts are being made both by the government and non-governmental organizations to mitigate the situation in rural areas notably in Nyeri district which is a relatively poor district in central province with poverty rate standing at 30% (CBS, 2008). Nyeri district has been a target of a non-governmental organization, The International Smallgroup and Tree Planting Program (TIST). Its objective is to help locals increase their income and conserve environment by planting trees. Farmers are increasingly joining the program substituting land previously allocated for food crops with tree planting enterprise. Despite presence of TIST, poverty still remains high in the region, with the statistics showing an increase in the population living below the poverty line from 29% in 2000 to 33% in 2006 (CBS, 2008). The main objective of the study was to determine the effects of TIST program on household income, environmental services and to determine factors that influence participation through a survey questionnaire. Multistage sampling was applied in selection of 120 farmers and analysis was done using SPSS and STATA. Heckman two stage sample selection model was used in analyzing factors that determine participation and log-log model was used to quantify the contribution of the program to household income upon participation. Descriptive statistics were used to determine the effects of the program on environmental services. The results showed no significant difference in income between participants and nonparticipants. Other socioeconomic and farm specific factors showed significant difference in household incomes. Farm sizes, access to micro-finance and program awareness positively influenced participation and were significant at 5% level of significance. Farm size p>(z) value was 0.048, access to micro finance(0.018) and program awareness(0.029). The program had a positive effect on a variety of environmental services. The study recommends that TIST program should adopt a better tree planting management approach to avoid total substitution of crops with tree planting enterprise and collaborate with the government and other stakeholders in linking farmers with market for their produce so as to enable them market their surplus and further research be done to explore issues that this study was not able to capture like technical issues regarding carbon sinking, the cost being presently incurred and potential benefits in the future and opportunity cost of the foregone agricultural output.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Collaborative Masters Program in Agricultural and Applied Economics in its series Research Theses with number 117709.

    in new window

    Date of creation: Mar 2010
    Handle: RePEc:ags:cmpart:117709
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    in new window

    1. Maxwell, Daniel G., 1996. "Measuring food insecurity: the frequency and severity of "coping strategies"," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 291-303, July.
    2. John M. Antle & Bocar Diagana, 2003. "Creating Incentives for the Adoption of Sustainable Agricultural Practices in Developing Countries: The Role of Soil Carbon Sequestration," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 85(5), pages 1178-1184.
    3. Hoddinott, John & Yohannes, Yisehac, 2002. "Dietary diversity as a food security indicator," FCND discussion papers 136, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    4. Antle, John & Capalbo, Susan & Mooney, Sian & Elliott, Edward & Paustian, Keith, 2003. "Spatial heterogeneity, contract design, and the efficiency of carbon sequestration policies for agriculture," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 231-250, September.
    5. Feng, Hongli & Kling, Catherine L. & Gassman, Philip W., 2004. "Carbon Sequestration, Co-Benefits, and Conservation Programs," Choices, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 19(3).
    6. Geda, A. & de Jong, N. & Mwabu, G. & Kimenyi, M.S., 2001. "Determinants of poverty in Kenya : a household level analysis," ISS Working Papers - General Series 19095, International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS), The Hague.
    7. S. Brown & M. Burnham & M. Delaney & M. Powell & R. Vaca & A. Moreno, 2000. "Issues and challenges for forest-based carbon-offset projects: A case study of the Noel Kempff climate action project in Bolivia," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 99-121, March.
    8. Jera, R. & Ajayi, Olu Clifford, 2008. "Logistic modelling of smallholder livestock farmers’ adoption of tree-based fodder technology in Zimbabwe," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 47(3), September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:cmpart:117709. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.