Whole farm considerations in the design of management agreements
Management agreements for the delivery of environmental services by farmers typically relate to that part of the farm that is of immediate public interest. However, the decision-making unit with which the farmer is primarily concerned is the farm business as a whole. This provides the context within which any particular area of the farm is managed. In this paper, the importance that a focus on the wider farm context might hold for achievement of conservation outcomes is shown by drawing on economic theory as well as recent case studies of farm businesses. Factors likely to influence conservation outcomes are: motives and other behavioural influences, character of production processes and farmer routines, potential to define alternative farm futures, uncertainty, capabilities of the farm manager and resources available to them. These factors have implications for how economists approach key issues in design of management agreements - information asymmetry, cost (including transaction cost) and encouraging proactive rather than reactive behaviour by the economic agent. Whole farm considerations will be taken into account by farmers in their decisions about whether to participate in management agreements, and in the terms of that participation. In this paper, explicit attention is given to opportunities that the principal has to address whole farm considerations. These opportunities can be addressed in the assessment process, in preconditions, as part of the management agreement, or as complementary mechanisms. The purpose of the paper is to highlight these opportunities, and to discuss their pros and cons. Tentative conclusions are drawn, and further research into this previously unexplored topic is proposed.
|Date of creation:||Feb 2003|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: AARES Central Office Manager, Crawford School of Public Policy, ANU, Canberra ACT 0200|
Phone: 0409 032 338
Web page: http://www.aares.info/
More information through EDIRC
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Malcolm, Bill, 1990. "Fifty Years of Farm Management in Australia: Survey and Review," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 58(01), April.
- Uwe Latacz-Lohmann & Carel P. C. M. Hamsvoort, 1998. "Auctions as a Means of Creating a Market for Public Goods from Agriculture," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(3), pages 334-345.
- Susan Offutt, 2002. "The Future of Farm Policy Analysis: A Household Perspective," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 84(5), pages 1189-1200.
- Mohr, Ernst, 1994. "Environmental norms, society, and economics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(3), pages 229-239, April.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aare03:57857. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.