IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea26/404468.html

Green Transition and Market Selection: Agri-environmental Policy and Environmentally Friendly Firm Dynamics in China

Author

Listed:
  • Tan, Zhaofeng
  • Zhu, Xinlei
  • Huang, Teng
  • Liu, Tianjun

Abstract

Existing research on how environmental policy affects firm dynamics has focused mainly on highly polluting firms. By contrast, there is still limited evidence on how such policies shape the entry and exit of green agribusiness. This paper studies a Chinese agricultural environmental policy that combines regulation with incentives and was gradually introduced at the county level from 2017 onward. We treat this rollout as a quasi-natural experiment. Using a staggered difference-in-differences design, we identify the causal effects of agricultural environmental policy on the dynamics of green agriculture-related firms. We find that the policy increased entry by about 10.67 percent and exit by about 9.84 percent among green agriculture-related firms. The evidence points to market selection as the main mechanism. The policy increased market demand for green agriculture from both consumers and agricultural producers. It also raised the revenues and profits of incumbent green agriculture-related firms. In addition, the policy reduced informal costs, especially financing frictions, but did not significantly relax formal institutional barriers. Lower entry costs and stronger market expectations increased the expected returns to entry and encouraged green agribusiness to enter. At the same time, intensified competition pushed less efficient firms out of the market. This pattern is especially pronounced among smaller firms, firms with narrower business scopes, less diversified firms, and firms with weaker profitability. The policy also generated both environmental and economic gains. It reduced methane emissions by about 1.06 percent and nitrous oxide emissions by about 1.68 percent. It also increased nighttime light intensity by about 3.57 percent. Overall, this paper provides new micro-level evidence on how environmental policy shapes green agribusines dynamics. It also offers evidence from China that may inform green structural transformation in agriculture in developing countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Tan, Zhaofeng & Zhu, Xinlei & Huang, Teng & Liu, Tianjun, 2026. "Green Transition and Market Selection: Agri-environmental Policy and Environmentally Friendly Firm Dynamics in China," 2026 Annual Meeting, July 26 - 28, 2026, Kansas City, Missouri 404468, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea26:404468
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.404468
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/404468/files/177524_193280_115232_Green_Transition_and_Market_Selection_Agri-environmental_Policy_and_Green_Agribusiness_Dynamics_in_China.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.404468?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Henderson, J Vernon, 1996. "Effects of Air Quality Regulation," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 86(4), pages 789-813, September.
    2. Simeon Djankov & Rafael La Porta & Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes & Andrei Shleifer, 2002. "The Regulation of Entry," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 117(1), pages 1-37.
    3. Dean, Thomas J. & Brown, Robert L. & Stango, Victor, 2000. "Environmental Regulation as a Barrier to the Formation of Small Manufacturing Establishments: A Longitudinal Examination," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 56-75, July.
    4. Dixit, Avinash K, 1989. "Entry and Exit Decisions under Uncertainty," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 97(3), pages 620-638, June.
    5. Sabrina T. Howell, 2017. "Financing Innovation: Evidence from R&D Grants," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 107(4), pages 1136-1164, April.
    6. Randy Becker & Vernon Henderson, 2000. "Effects of Air Quality Regulations on Polluting Industries," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 108(2), pages 379-421, April.
    7. Kirill Borusyak & Xavier Jaravel & Jann Spiess, 2024. "Revisiting Event-Study Designs: Robust and Efficient Estimation," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 91(6), pages 3253-3285.
    8. Dongmin Kong & Ni Qin, 2021. "Does Environmental Regulation Shape Entrepreneurship?," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 80(1), pages 169-196, September.
    9. Li, Pei & Lu, Yi & Wang, Jin, 2016. "Does flattening government improve economic performance? Evidence from China," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 18-37.
    10. Jonathan Colmer & Ralf Martin & Mirabelle Muûls & Ulrich J Wagner, 2025. "Does Pricing Carbon Mitigate Climate Change? Firm-Level Evidence from the European Union Emissions Trading System," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 92(3), pages 1625-1660.
    11. List, John A. & McHone, W. Warren & Millimet, Daniel L., 2004. "Effects of environmental regulation on foreign and domestic plant births: is there a home field advantage?," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 303-326, September.
    12. Wang, Chunhua & Wu, JunJie & Zhang, Bing, 2018. "Environmental regulation, emissions and productivity: Evidence from Chinese COD-emitting manufacturers," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 54-73.
    13. Hopenhayn, Hugo A, 1992. "Entry, Exit, and Firm Dynamics in Long Run Equilibrium," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 60(5), pages 1127-1150, September.
    14. Daron Acemoglu & Philippe Aghion & Leonardo Bursztyn & David Hemous, 2012. "The Environment and Directed Technical Change," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 102(1), pages 131-166, February.
    15. Nick Bloom & Stephen Bond & John Van Reenen, 2007. "Uncertainty and Investment Dynamics," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 74(2), pages 391-415.
    16. Daron Acemoglu & Simon Johnson, 2005. "Unbundling Institutions," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 113(5), pages 949-995, October.
    17. Adam B. Jaffe et al., 1995. "Environmental Regulation and the Competitiveness of U.S. Manufacturing: What Does the Evidence Tell Us?," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 33(1), pages 132-163, March.
    18. Nick Johnstone & Ivan Haščič & David Popp, 2017. "Erratum to: Renewable Energy Policies and Technological Innovation: Evidence Based on Patent Counts," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 68(2), pages 441-444, October.
    19. Cheng, Hua & Ding, Siying & Liu, Yongzheng, 2024. "The effectiveness of entry deregulation: Novel evidence from removing minimum capital requirements," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    20. Klapper, Leora & Laeven, Luc & Rajan, Raghuram, 2006. "Entry regulation as a barrier to entrepreneurship," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 82(3), pages 591-629, December.
    21. Callaway, Brantly & Sant’Anna, Pedro H.C., 2021. "Difference-in-Differences with multiple time periods," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 225(2), pages 200-230.
    22. Bresnahan, Timothy F & Reiss, Peter C, 1991. "Entry and Competition in Concentrated Markets," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 99(5), pages 977-1009, October.
    23. Michael Greenstone, 2002. "The Impacts of Environmental Regulations on Industrial Activity: Evidence from the 1970 and 1977 Clean Air Act Amendments and the Census of Manufactures," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 110(6), pages 1175-1219, December.
    24. Chen, Zhao & Kahn, Matthew E. & Liu, Yu & Wang, Zhi, 2018. "The consequences of spatially differentiated water pollution regulation in China," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 468-485.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang, Zhijiu & Ding, Hai, 2024. "Turning a blind eye: How local government fiscal distress affects the entry of energy-intensive enterprises," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    2. Deng, Hongbin & Ni, Xiaoran, 2025. "Low-carbon transformation and risk Transferring: Evidence from subsidiaries of listed firms in China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    3. Millimet, Daniel L., 2013. "Environmental Federalism: A Survey of the Empirical Literature," IZA Discussion Papers 7831, IZA Network @ LISER.
    4. Haichao Fan & Joshua Graff Zivin & Zonglai Kou & Xueyue Liu & Huanhuan Wang, 2025. "Going green in China: Firms' responses to stricter environmental regulations," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 58(1), pages 385-410, February.
    5. Chen, Ying & Wu, Wenjie & Yun, Yanwen, 2025. "The geography of pollution regulation and productivity," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    6. Li, Shuo & Wang, Min, 2025. "Environmental regulation and firms’ extensive margin decisions," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    7. Shiyi Chen & Xiaoxiao Ding & Pingyi Lou & Hong Song, 2022. "New evidence of moral hazard: Environmental liability insurance and firms' environmental performance," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 89(3), pages 581-613, September.
    8. Dongmin Kong & Ni Qin, 2021. "Does Environmental Regulation Shape Entrepreneurship?," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 80(1), pages 169-196, September.
    9. E. Mark Curtis, 2014. "Who Loses Under Power Plant Cap-and-Trade Programs?," NBER Working Papers 20808, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Li, Shuo & Wang, Min, 2022. "Environmental Regulation and Firms’ Extensive Margin Decisions," EfD Discussion Paper 22-15, Environment for Development, University of Gothenburg.
    11. Jinlei Li & Yuanbiao Huang & Lei Wang, 2025. "Impact of National Technology Transfer Markets on Entrepreneurship in China," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 33(3), pages 76-108, May.
    12. Cui, Jingbo & Moschini, GianCarlo, 2020. "Firm internal network, environmental regulation, and plant death," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    13. Consoli, Davide & Marin, Giovanni & Marzucchi, Alberto & Vona, Francesco, 2016. "Do green jobs differ from non-green jobs in terms of skills and human capital?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(5), pages 1046-1060.
    14. Dong, Zhanyu & Cai, Jiayi & Li, Xuchao & Luan, Mengna, 2025. "Firm-level impacts and recovery dynamics following a public health crisis: Lessons from China’s SARS experience," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    15. Baxamusa, Mufaddal & Jalal, Abu, 2024. "Environmental regulations, agency costs, and firm performance," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(PA).
    16. Becker, Randy A., 2005. "Air pollution abatement costs under the Clean Air Act: evidence from the PACE survey," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 144-169, July.
    17. Kerui Du & Qilin Huang & Presley K. Wesseh, 2025. "Domestic Pollution Havens: Linking Interregional Capital Flight and Water Pollution Regulation in China," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 88(1), pages 125-161, January.
    18. Shiyu Bo, 2021. "Environmental Regulations, Political Incentives and Local Economic Activities: Evidence from China," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 83(3), pages 812-835, June.
    19. Kim, Taehyun & Lim, Yaeji, 2024. "Environmental spillovers and local agglomeration: Evidence from large plant openings," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).
    20. Guan, Jin & He, Dongwei & Zhu, Qigui, 2022. "More incentive, less pollution: The influence of official appraisal system reform on environmental enforcement," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea26:404468. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.