Influence of Management on Ontario Beef Operation Margins
The long term prospects for cattle farmers in the province of Ontario will depend on their ability to stay competitive in a changing business environment: managing the returns to farm operations will be critical to their long run viability. Focusing on good management practices that reduce operational inefficiencies and that increase gross margins may be the best strategy available to producers for reducing costs and increasing output (Kalirajan, 1981). Such short run management decision making should translate into long run business viability. Groth (1992, p.3) argues that businesses operate under an “operating cycle.” An operating cycle includes the assets, cash, raw materials, work-in-process, finished goods and accounts receivable of the business – with each component varying by type of business. Managed properly the operating cycle is the origin of economic returns to the business operation. Operating cycles are important because: (1) managers can affect the cycle over short time periods – hence, management decisions and actions can yield immediate results; (2) the manager often has the authority to make changes and implement them right away; and (3) greater levels of economic returns can be achieved through effective management which reduce operating risk and lower the cost of capital over the long run. We use contribution margin to measure operational performance of Ontario cow-calf farms for these reasons. We focus on how Ontario beef farmers can improve their operational efficiency by (1) benchmarking their performance against competitors using key performance indicators (KPIs) of effective enterprise management; and (2) understanding the management practices of high margin farms in order to improve industry performance.
|Date of creation:||2012|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: 555 East Wells Street, Suite 1100, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202|
Phone: (414) 918-3190
Fax: (414) 276-3349
Web page: http://www.aaea.org
More information through EDIRC
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- John M. Antle, 2000. "No Such Thing as a Free Safe Lunch: The Cost of Food Safety Regulation in the Meat Industry," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 82(2), pages 310-322.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea12:126949. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.