IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/aap/wpaper/225.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Economic Incentives or Communication: How Different Are their Effects on Trust

Author

Listed:
  • Tatiana Iwai
  • Paulo Furquim de Azevedo

Abstract

This study investigates the effects of economic incentives and communication on the cognitive and behavioral responses after an alleged trust violation. We argue that these responses depend on the type of solution used to foster cooperation between agents. On the cognitive level, we compare the effects that structural (economic incentives) and motivational (communication) solutions exert on trusting beliefs and trusting intentions after an adverse event. On the behavioral level, we compare these effects on the willingness to bear risk. Our experiment shows that, after a negative event, relationships wherein communication is used to foster cooperation are associated to greater external causal attribution, greater perceived benevolence/integrity, and greater willingness to reconcile and to accept risks related to other's behavior. These findings suggest that relationships based on motivational solutions are more resilient to negative events than one based on structural solutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Tatiana Iwai & Paulo Furquim de Azevedo, 2016. "Economic Incentives or Communication: How Different Are their Effects on Trust," Business and Economics Working Papers 225, Unidade de Negocios e Economia, Insper.
    • Handle: RePEc:aap:wpaper:225
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repositorio.insper.edu.br/server/api/core/bitstreams/be560950-fe7a-48fd-95b2-005aa4ed3b60/content?authentication-token=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJlaWQiOiIwNmRmYmM2MS1iNGQ1LTQ1YzgtYjlmNS1lYTk1ZDQwYTIwNzkiLCJzZyI6W10sImF1dGhlbnRpY2F0aW9uTWV0aG9kIjoicGFzc3dvcmQiLCJleHAiOjE3NDA3ODkxOTZ9.fH2n2Zu_50rQDArX0qQNtrtrjbd3YcYAKEH-XpTyR4g
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aap:wpaper:225. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Biblioteca Telles (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inspebr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.