Economic Impacts of Subsidy Rationalization Malaysia
Subsidy rationalization efforts by governments remain constrained as many policy plans have been delayed based on argument that subsidy policies have objectives that go beyond economic rationale. This paper examines Malaysia’s energy subsidy experience, in terms of the direct and indirect effects of subsidy distribution and reallocation, and considers whether the rationale for subsidy policy in the case of energy has been justified. Subsidy removal impacts how efficient an economy performs in terms: of energy product prices; cost of production; transportation services; government budget; household consumption: and general level of prices. As a subsidy row is non-existence in the 2005 published Malaysian input-output (I-O) table which would inform current policy, we create a subsidy row in the form of total fuel subsidy which has been constructed to assess the expected impacts of phasing out fuel subsidies in the short, medium and long run. This study employs Leontief’s and a computable general equilibrium (CGE) model based on national and social accounts of the Malaysian economy, disaggregating and constructing a hybrid energy I-O matrix and partitioning the I-O table into energy and non-energy blocks. An explicit representation of the impacts of energy products; especially those which have received greater amounts of subsidy is embedded in this modelling. The modelling informs energy pricing, the domains of government intervention in energy markets, and the international experience in mitigating the negative impact of energy pricing reform. Features of the petroleum sector in the Malaysian economy and its interactions with the main economic variables are considered. I-O analysis is used to set a reallocation scheme using changes in wage levels and value added impacted by total fuel subsidy particularly on autonomous spending by households and growth. Finally, the CGE analysis, which is superior in substitution effects compared with I-O analysis, will explain the overall macroeconomic impacts of phasing out subsidies and the impacts of reallocation into related sectors using government expenditure. In conclusion, policy options reliant on cheap energy inputs and delays in subsidy rationalization pose a significant threat for Malaysia’s continuing economic competitiveness in the region.
|This chapter was published in: ||This item is provided by Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA) in its series Chapters with number
2011-rpr-17-09.||Handle:|| RePEc:era:chaptr:2011-rpr-17-09||Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Web page: http://www.eria.org/
More information through EDIRC
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Mark Horridge, 2000. "ORANI-G: A General Equilibrium Model of the Australian Economy," Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre Working Papers op-93, Victoria University, Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre.
- Davood Manzoor & Asghar Shahmoradi & Iman Haqiqi, 2012. "An analysis of energy price reform: a CGE approach," OPEC Energy Review, Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, vol. 36(1), pages 35-54, 03.
- Abbas Valadkhani & William F. Mitchell, 2002. "Assessing the Impact of Changes in Petroleum Prices on Inflation and Household Expenditures in Australia," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 35(2), pages 122-132.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:era:chaptr:2011-rpr-17-09. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Hiroshi Okasaki)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.