IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/f/pri234.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Michael Richter

Not to be confused with: Michael Richter

Personal Details

First Name:Michael
Middle Name:
Last Name:Richter
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:pri234
[This author has chosen not to make the email address public]
http://mrichter.co/
Terminal Degree:2012 Department of Economics; New York University (NYU) (from RePEc Genealogy)

Affiliation

(50%) Zicklin School of Business
Baruch College
City University of New York (CUNY)

New York City, New York (United States)
http://zicklin.baruch.cuny.edu/
RePEc:edi:zscunus (more details at EDIRC)

(50%) Department of Economics
Royal Holloway

Egham, United Kingdom
http://rhul.ac.uk/Economics/
RePEc:edi:derhbuk (more details at EDIRC)

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers Articles

Working papers

  1. Richter, Michael & Rubinstein, Ariel, 2015. "Back to Fundamentals: Equilibrium in Abstract Economies," Foerder Institute for Economic Research Working Papers 275833, Tel-Aviv University > Foerder Institute for Economic Research.

Articles

  1. Christopher P. Chambers & Michael Richter, 2023. "Ordinal allocation," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 60(1), pages 5-14, January.
  2. Guney, Begum & Richter, Michael, 2022. "Games with switching costs and endogenous references," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 17(2), May.
  3. Michael Richter & Ariel Rubinstein, 2021. "Holding a Group Together: Non-Game Theory Versus Game Theory," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 131(638), pages 2629-2641.
  4. Richter, Michael & Rubinstein, Ariel, 2020. "The permissible and the forbidden," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
  5. Richter, Michael, 2019. "Mechanism design with budget constraints and a population of agents," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 30-47.
  6. Richter, Michael & Rubinstein, Ariel, 2019. ""Convex preferences": a new definition," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 14(4), November.
  7. Guney, Begum & Richter, Michael & Tsur, Matan, 2018. "Aspiration-based choice," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 935-956.
  8. Guney, Begum & Richter, Michael, 2018. "Costly switching from a status quo," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 55-70.
  9. Guney, Begum & Richter, Michael, 2015. "An experiment on aspiration-based choice," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 512-526.
  10. Michael Richter & Ariel Rubinstein, 2015. "Back to Fundamentals: Equilibrium in Abstract Economies," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 105(8), pages 2570-2594, August.
  11. Richter, Michael, 2014. "Fully absorbing dynamic compromise," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 92-104.
  12. Kfir Eliaz & Michael Richter & Ariel Rubinstein, 2011. "Choosing the two finalists," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 46(2), pages 211-219, February.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Working papers

  1. Richter, Michael & Rubinstein, Ariel, 2015. "Back to Fundamentals: Equilibrium in Abstract Economies," Foerder Institute for Economic Research Working Papers 275833, Tel-Aviv University > Foerder Institute for Economic Research.

    Cited by:

    1. Christopher Chambers & Alan Miller & M. Bumin Yenmez, 2015. "Closure and Preferences," GSIA Working Papers 2015-E36, Carnegie Mellon University, Tepper School of Business.
    2. Patrick Beissner & Frank Riedel, 2016. "Knight--Walras Equilibria," Papers 1605.04385, arXiv.org.
    3. Patrick Beissner & Frank Riedel, 2019. "Equilibria Under Knightian Price Uncertainty," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 87(1), pages 37-64, January.
    4. O'Callaghan, Patrick, 2016. "Measuring utility without mixing apples and oranges and eliciting beliefs about stock prices," MPRA Paper 69363, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Victor Olkhov, 2018. "Econophysics Beyond General Equilibrium: the Business Cycle Model," Papers 1804.04721, arXiv.org.
    6. Balbuzanov, Ivan & Kotowski, Maciej H., 2017. "Endowments, Exclusion, and Exchange," Working Paper Series rwp17-016, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    7. Ariel Rubinstein & Kemal Yıldız, 2022. "An étude in modeling the definability of equilibrium," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 26(4), pages 543-552, December.
    8. Olkhov, Victor, 2018. "Economic Transactions Govern Business Cycles," MPRA Paper 88531, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 19 Aug 2018.
    9. Pycia, Marek & Miralles, Antonio, 2020. "Foundations of Pseudomarkets: Walrasian Equilibria for Discrete Resources," CEPR Discussion Papers 15161, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    10. M. Ali Khan & Metin Uyan{i}k, 2018. "Topological Connectedness and Behavioral Assumptions on Preferences: A Two-Way Relationship," Papers 1810.02004, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2018.
    11. Herings, P. Jean-Jacques, 2020. "Expectational Equilibria in Many-to-one Matching Models with Contracts - A Reformulation of Competitive Equilibrium," Research Memorandum 018, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).
    12. Elizabeth Baldwin & Paul Klemperer, 2015. "Understanding Preferences: “Demand Types”, and the Existence of Equilibrium with Indivisibilities," Economics Papers 2015-W10, Economics Group, Nuffield College, University of Oxford.
    13. Brendan Markey-Towler, 2016. "Law of the jungle: firm survival and price dynamics in evolutionary markets," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 655-696, July.
    14. Tony Bryant & Doug McLeod, 2020. "The Guidance of an Enterprise Economy," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 96(313), pages 209-210, June.
    15. Beissner, Patrick & Werner, Jan, 2023. "Optimal allocations with α-MaxMin utilities, Choquet expected utilities, and Prospect Theory," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 18(3), July.
    16. Somdeb Lahiri, 2017. "Competitive Equilibrium in Generalized Games: A New Interpretation," Studies in Microeconomics, , vol. 5(1), pages 35-52, June.
    17. Olkhov, Victor, 2018. "Economic and Financial Transactions Govern Business Cycles," MPRA Paper 93269, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Richter, Michael & Rubinstein, Ariel, 2020. "The permissible and the forbidden," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    19. Hamed Hamze Bajgiran & Federico Echenique, 2022. "Closure operators: Complexity and applications to classification and decision-making," Papers 2202.05339, arXiv.org, revised May 2022.
    20. Balbuzanov, Ivan & Kotowski, Maciej, 2019. "The Property Rights Theory of Production Networks," Working Paper Series rwp19-033, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    21. Annie Tubadji, 2020. "Value-Free Analysis of Values: A Culture-Based Development Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-17, November.

Articles

  1. Guney, Begum & Richter, Michael, 2022. "Games with switching costs and endogenous references," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 17(2), May.

    Cited by:

    1. Tóbiás, Áron, 2023. "Rational Altruism," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 50-80.
    2. Yevgeny Tsodikovich & Xavier Venel & Anna Zseleva, 2022. "Folk Theorems in Repeated Games with Switching Costs," Working Papers hal-03888188, HAL.

  2. Richter, Michael & Rubinstein, Ariel, 2020. "The permissible and the forbidden," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).

    Cited by:

    1. Ariel Rubinstein & Kemal Yıldız, 2022. "An étude in modeling the definability of equilibrium," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 26(4), pages 543-552, December.
    2. Leo Katz & Alvaro Sandroni, 2021. "The (Non) Economic Properties of the Law," Games, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-8, March.
    3. Cole, Richard & Tao, Yixin, 2021. "On the existence of Pareto Efficient and envy-free allocations," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    4. Marek Hudik, 2020. "Equilibrium as compatibility of plans," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 89(3), pages 349-368, October.

  3. Richter, Michael, 2019. "Mechanism design with budget constraints and a population of agents," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 30-47.

    Cited by:

    1. Naoki Kojima, 2014. "Mechanism design to the budget constrained buyer: a canonical mechanism approach," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 43(3), pages 693-719, August.
    2. Boulatov, Alexei & Severinov, Sergei, 2021. "Optimal and efficient mechanisms with asymmetrically budget constrained buyers," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 155-178.
    3. Xie, Yimei & Ding, Chuan & Li, Yang & Wang, Kaihong, 2023. "Optimal incentive contract in continuous time with different behavior relationships between agents," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    4. Jianxin Rong & Ning Sun & Dazhong Wang, 2019. "A New Evaluation Criterion for Allocation Mechanisms with Application to Vehicle License Allocations in China," The Journal of Mechanism and Institution Design, Society for the Promotion of Mechanism and Institution Design, University of York, vol. 4(1), pages 39-86, November.
    5. Holzer, Jorge & McConnell, Kenneth, 2023. "Extraction rights allocation with liquidity constraints," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    6. Carbajal, Juan Carlos & Mu'alem, Ahuva, 2020. "Selling mechanisms for a financially constrained buyer," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 386-405.
    7. Ghosh, Gagan, 2021. "Simultaneous auctions with budgets: Equilibrium existence and characterization," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 75-93.

  4. Richter, Michael & Rubinstein, Ariel, 2019. ""Convex preferences": a new definition," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 14(4), November.

    Cited by:

    1. Christopher Chambers & Alan Miller & M. Bumin Yenmez, 2015. "Closure and Preferences," GSIA Working Papers 2015-E36, Carnegie Mellon University, Tepper School of Business.
    2. Victor H. Aguiar & Per Hjertstrand & Roberto Serrano, 2020. "Rationalizable Incentives: Interim Implementation of Sets in Rationalizable Strategies," Working Papers 2020-16, Brown University, Department of Economics.
    3. Aguiar, Victor H. & Hjertstrand, Per & Serrano, Roberto, 2020. "A Rationalization of the Weak Axiom of Revealed Preference," Working Paper Series 1321, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.

  5. Guney, Begum & Richter, Michael & Tsur, Matan, 2018. "Aspiration-based choice," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 935-956.

    Cited by:

    1. Guney, Begum & Richter, Michael, 2018. "Costly switching from a status quo," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 55-70.
    2. Eszter Czibor & Danny Hsu & David Jimenez-Gomez & Susanne Neckermann & Burcu Subasi, 2022. "Loss-Framed Incentives and Employee (Mis-)Behavior," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(10), pages 7518-7537, October.
    3. Vladimír Novák & Andrei Matveenko & Silvio Ravaioli, 2023. "The Status Quo and Belief Polarization of Inattentive Agents: Theory and Experiment," Working and Discussion Papers WP 5/2023, Research Department, National Bank of Slovakia.
    4. José Ramón Uriarte & Stefan Sperlich, 2021. "A behavioural model of minority language shift: Theory and empirical evidence," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(6), pages 1-17, June.
    5. DasGupta, Ranjan & Dhochak, Monika, 2021. "Risk-Antecedents of Firms and Strategic Mediators – New Evidence from a Cross-Country Analysis," American Business Review, Pompea College of Business, University of New Haven, vol. 24(1), pages 3-35, May.
    6. Stefan Sperlich & Jose-Ramon Uriarte, 2019. "The economics of minority language use: theory and empirical evidence for a language game model," Papers 1908.11604, arXiv.org.

  6. Guney, Begum & Richter, Michael, 2018. "Costly switching from a status quo," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 55-70.

    Cited by:

    1. Matthew Kovach & Elchin Suleymanov, 2021. "Reference Dependence and Random Attention," Papers 2106.13350, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2023.
    2. Tóbiás, Áron, 2023. "Rational Altruism," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 50-80.
    3. Miguel Costa-Gomes & Georgios Gerasimou, 2020. "Status Quo Bias and the Decoy Effect: A Comparative Analysis in Choice under Risk," Papers 2006.14868, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2021.
    4. Yevgeny Tsodikovich & Xavier Venel & Anna Zseleva, 2022. "Folk Theorems in Repeated Games with Switching Costs," Working Papers hal-03888188, HAL.

  7. Guney, Begum & Richter, Michael, 2015. "An experiment on aspiration-based choice," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 512-526.

    Cited by:

    1. Guney, Begum & Richter, Michael, 2018. "Costly switching from a status quo," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 55-70.
    2. José Ramón Uriarte & Stefan Sperlich, 2021. "A behavioural model of minority language shift: Theory and empirical evidence," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(6), pages 1-17, June.
    3. Aguiar, Victor H., 2017. "Random categorization and bounded rationality," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 46-52.
    4. Guney, Begum & Richter, Michael & Tsur, Matan, 2018. "Aspiration-based choice," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 935-956.
    5. Stefan Sperlich & Jose-Ramon Uriarte, 2019. "The economics of minority language use: theory and empirical evidence for a language game model," Papers 1908.11604, arXiv.org.

  8. Michael Richter & Ariel Rubinstein, 2015. "Back to Fundamentals: Equilibrium in Abstract Economies," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 105(8), pages 2570-2594, August.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  9. Richter, Michael, 2014. "Fully absorbing dynamic compromise," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 92-104.

    Cited by:

    1. Anesi, Vincent & Duggan, John, 2018. "Existence and indeterminacy of markovian equilibria in dynamic bargaining games," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 13(2), May.
    2. Nunnari, Salvatore, 2021. "Dynamic legislative bargaining with veto power: Theory and experiments," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 186-230.
    3. Jeon, Jee Seon & Hwang, Ilwoo, 2022. "The emergence and persistence of oligarchy: A dynamic model of endogenous political power," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    4. David P Baron, 2018. "Elections and durable governments in parliamentary governments," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 30(1), pages 74-118, January.
    5. David P. Baron & Renee Bowen & Salvatore Nunnari, 2016. "Durable Coalitions and Communication: Public versus Private Negotiations," NBER Working Papers 22821, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Zapal, Jan, 2020. "Simple Markovian equilibria in dynamic spatial legislative bargaining," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    7. Baron, David P. & Bowen, T. Renee, 2013. "Dynamic Coalitions," Research Papers 2128, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    8. Wioletta Dziuda & Antoine Loeper, 2016. "Dynamic Collective Choice with Endogenous Status Quo," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 124(4), pages 1148-1186.
    9. T. Renee Bowen, 2015. "Legislated Protection And The World Trade Organization," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 56(4), pages 1349-1384, November.
    10. Sonin, Konstantin & Egorov, Georgy & Diermeier, Daniel, 2016. "Political Economy of Redistribution," CEPR Discussion Papers 11285, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    11. Vincent Anesi & T Renee Bowen, 2018. "Policy Experimentation, Redistribution and Voting Rules," Discussion Papers 2018-09, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
    12. Marina Azzimonti & Gabriel P. Mihalache & Laura Karpuska, 2020. "Bargaining over Taxes and Entitlements," NBER Working Papers 27595, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    13. Tasos Kalandrakis, 2016. "Pareto efficiency in the dynamic one-dimensional bargaining model," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 28(4), pages 525-536, October.
    14. Hülya Eraslan & Kirill S. Evdokimov & Jan Zápal, 2022. "Dynamic Legislative Bargaining," Springer Books, in: Emin Karagözoğlu & Kyle B. Hyndman (ed.), Bargaining, chapter 0, pages 151-175, Springer.
    15. Vincent Anesi, 2018. "Dynamic Legislative Policy Making under Adverse Selection," Discussion Papers 2018-08, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
    16. Kawamori, Tomohiko, 2019. "Bilateral bargaining with endogenous status quo," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    17. David P. Baron, 2019. "Simple dynamics of legislative bargaining: coalitions and proposal power," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 67(1), pages 319-344, February.
    18. Marina Azzimonti & Laura Karpuska & Gabriel Mihalache, 2020. "Bargaining over Mandatory Spending and Entitlements," Department of Economics Working Papers 20-02, Stony Brook University, Department of Economics.
    19. Vincent Anesi & John Duggan, 2015. "Dynamic Bargaining and External Stability with Veto Players," Discussion Papers 2015-12, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
    20. Anesi, Vincent & Duggan, John, 2017. "Dynamic bargaining and stability with veto players," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 30-40.
    21. Vincent Anesi & Daniel J Seidmann, 2012. "Bargaining in Standing Committees," Discussion Papers 2012-09, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.

  10. Kfir Eliaz & Michael Richter & Ariel Rubinstein, 2011. "Choosing the two finalists," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 46(2), pages 211-219, February.

    Cited by:

    1. Igor Kopylov, 2022. "Minimal rationalizations," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 73(4), pages 859-879, June.
    2. Kops, Christopher, 2022. "Cluster-shortlisted choice," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    3. Karpov, Alexander, 2015. "A theory of knockout tournament seedings," Working Papers 0600, University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics.
    4. Geoffroy de Clippel & Kfir Eliaz, 2009. "Reason-Based Choice: A Bargaining Rationale for the Attraction and Compromise Effects," Working Papers 2009-4, Brown University, Department of Economics.
    5. Robert Sugden & Jiwei Zheng, 2015. "Do consumers take advantage of common pricing standards? An experimental investigation," Working Paper series, University of East Anglia, Centre for Behavioural and Experimental Social Science (CBESS) 15-12, School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..
    6. Manzini, Paola & Mariotti, Marco & Tyson, Christopher J., 2016. "Partial knowledge restrictions on the two-stage threshold model of choice," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 41-47.
    7. Geng, Sen, 2022. "Limited consideration model with a trigger or a capacity," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    8. Manzini, Paola & Mariotti, Marco & Tyson, Christopher J., 2011. "Manipulation of Choice Behavior," IZA Discussion Papers 5891, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    9. Yusufcan Masatlioglu & Daisuke Nakajima & Erkut Ozbay, 2009. "Revealed Attention," NajEcon Working Paper Reviews 814577000000000409, www.najecon.org.
    10. Christopher Kops, 2018. "(F)Lexicographic shortlist method," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 65(1), pages 79-97, January.
    11. T. Hayashi & R. Jain & V. Korpela & M. Lombardi, 2023. "Behavioral strong implementation," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 76(4), pages 1257-1287, November.
    12. Salvador Barberà & Alejandro Neme, 2015. "Ordinal Relative Satisficing Behavior: Theory and Experiments," Working Papers 790, Barcelona School of Economics.
    13. Papi, Mauro, 2012. "Satisficing choice procedures," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 84(1), pages 451-462.
    14. Gent Bajraj & Levent Ülkü, 2013. "Choosing two Finalists and the Winner," Working Papers 1305, Centro de Investigacion Economica, ITAM.
    15. Manzini, Paola & Mariotti, Marco, 2018. "Dual random utility maximisation," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 162-182.
    16. Lleras, Juan Sebastián & Masatlioglu, Yusufcan & Nakajima, Daisuke & Ozbay, Erkut Y., 2017. "When more is less: Limited consideration," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 70-85.
    17. Mauro Papi, 2014. "Noncompensatory consideration and compensatory choice: an application to Stackelberg competition," Economic Theory Bulletin, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 2(1), pages 53-63, April.
    18. Cherepanov, Vadim & Feddersen, Timothy & ,, 2013. "Rationalization," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 8(3), September.
    19. Spears Dean, 2011. "Intertemporal Bounded Rationality as Consideration Sets with Contraction Consistency," The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, June.
    20. Geng, Sen & Özbay, Erkut Y., 2021. "Shortlisting procedure with a limited capacity," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    21. Tserenjigmid, Gerelt, 2019. "Choosing with the worst in mind: A reference-dependent model," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 631-652.
    22. Adam Szeidl & Botond Koszegi, 2011. "A Model of Focusing in Economic Choice," 2011 Meeting Papers 1441, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    23. Salvador Barberà & Geoffroy De Cleppel & Alejandro Neme & Kareen Rozeen, 2020. "Order-k Rationality," Working Papers 4, Red Nacional de Investigadores en Economía (RedNIE).
    24. Castillo, Geoffrey, 2020. "The attraction effect and its explanations," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 123-147.
    25. Chambers, Christopher P. & Yenmez, M. Bumin, 2018. "A simple characterization of responsive choice," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 217-221.
    26. Salvador Barberà & Geoffroy de Clippel & Alejandro Neme & Kareen Rozen, 2022. "Order-k rationality," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 73(4), pages 1135-1153, June.
    27. Salador Barera & Kareen Rozen, 2018. "Good Enough," Working Papers 2018-12, Brown University, Department of Economics.
    28. Meirav Aharon-Gutman, 2018. "Art’s failure to generate urban renewal: Lessons from Jerusalem," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(15), pages 3474-3491, November.
    29. Georgios Gerasimou, 2016. "Partially dominant choice," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 61(1), pages 127-145, January.
    30. O. Volij & M. Mahajne, 2020. "The Individually Acceptable Choice Correspondence," Working Papers 2015, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Department of Economics.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Co-authorship network on CollEc

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Michael Richter should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.