IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/f/ppe960.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Mike W. Peacey

Personal Details

First Name:Mike
Middle Name:W.
Last Name:Peacey
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:ppe960
[This author has chosen not to make the email address public]

Affiliation

Economics Faculty
New College of the Humanities

London, United Kingdom
https://www.nchlondon.ac.uk/economics-faculty/
RePEc:edi:efnchuk (more details at EDIRC)

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers Articles

Working papers

  1. Gervas Huxley & Mike W. Peacey, 2016. "Self-control at College," Bristol Economics Discussion Papers 16/675, School of Economics, University of Bristol, UK.
  2. Gervas Huxley & Mike Peacey, 2014. "A Simple Model of Learning Styles," The Centre for Market and Public Organisation 14/322, The Centre for Market and Public Organisation, University of Bristol, UK.
  3. Mike Peacey & Michael Sanders, 2014. "Masked Heroes: endogenous anonymity in charitable giving," The Centre for Market and Public Organisation 14/329, The Centre for Market and Public Organisation, University of Bristol, UK.
  4. Gervas Huxley & Mike Peacey, 2014. "An Economic Model of Learning Styles," The Centre for Market and Public Organisation 14/319, The Centre for Market and Public Organisation, University of Bristol, UK.

Articles

  1. Newall, Philip W.S. & Peacey, Mike W., 2021. "Pension behavior and policy," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 29(C).
  2. Ille, Sebastian & Peacey, Mike W., 2019. "Forced private tutoring in Egypt: Moving away from a corrupt social norm," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 105-118.
  3. Gervas Huxley & Jennifer Mayo & Mike W. Peacey & Maddy Richardson, 2018. "Class Size at University," Fiscal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(2), pages 241-264, June.
  4. In-Uck Park & Mike W. Peacey & Marcus R. Munafò, 2014. "Modelling the effects of subjective and objective decision making in scientific peer review," Nature, Nature, vol. 506(7486), pages 93-96, February.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Working papers

  1. Mike Peacey & Michael Sanders, 2014. "Masked Heroes: endogenous anonymity in charitable giving," The Centre for Market and Public Organisation 14/329, The Centre for Market and Public Organisation, University of Bristol, UK.

    Cited by:

    1. Daniel Jones & Sera Linardi, 2014. "Wallflowers: Experimental Evidence of an Aversion to Standing Out," Framed Field Experiments 00400, The Field Experiments Website.
    2. Yang Jiang & Yi-Chun (Chad) Ho & Xiangbin Yan & Yong Tan, 2022. "What’s in a “Username”? The Effect of Perceived Anonymity on Herding in Crowdfunding," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 1-17, March.
    3. Sarah Smith & Kimberley Scharf, 2014. "Relational Warm Glow and Giving in Social Groups," The Centre for Market and Public Organisation 14/327, The Centre for Market and Public Organisation, University of Bristol, UK.
    4. Gordon Burtch & Anindya Ghose & Sunil Wattal, 2016. "Secret Admirers: An Empirical Examination of Information Hiding and Contribution Dynamics in Online Crowdfunding," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 478-496, September.

  2. Gervas Huxley & Mike Peacey, 2014. "An Economic Model of Learning Styles," The Centre for Market and Public Organisation 14/319, The Centre for Market and Public Organisation, University of Bristol, UK.

    Cited by:

    1. Gervas Huxley & Mike W. Peacey, 2016. "Self-control at College," Bristol Economics Discussion Papers 16/675, School of Economics, University of Bristol, UK.

Articles

  1. Ille, Sebastian & Peacey, Mike W., 2019. "Forced private tutoring in Egypt: Moving away from a corrupt social norm," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 105-118.

    Cited by:

    1. Agwu, Prince & Orjiakor, Charles T. & Odii, Aloysius & Onalu, Chinyere & Nzeadibe, Chidi & Roy, Pallavi & Onwujekwe, Obinna & Okoye, Uzoma, 2022. "“Miracle Examination Centres” as hubs for malpractices in Senior Secondary School Certificate Examination in Nigeria: A systematic review," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    2. Fakih, Ali & Haimoun, Nathir & Sleiman, Anastasia, 2022. "What Drives Demand for Private Tutoring in the Middle East and North Africa Region? Evidence from a Youth Survey," IZA Discussion Papers 15319, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    3. Abdel-Moneim, Mohamed Alaa, 2021. "In search of a school façade: Explaining the centrality of private tutoring among high-performing students in Egypt," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    4. Mandikiana, Brian W., 2021. "Choice and expenditure: A double hurdle model of private tutoring in Qatar," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 1-15.

  2. Gervas Huxley & Jennifer Mayo & Mike W. Peacey & Maddy Richardson, 2018. "Class Size at University," Fiscal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(2), pages 241-264, June.

    Cited by:

    1. Kara, Elif & Tonin, Mirco & Vlassopoulos, Michael, 2021. "Class size effects in higher education: Differences across STEM and non-STEM fields," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    2. Jia Zhu & Hang Yuan & Quan Zhang & Po-Hsun Huang & Yongjie Wang & Sixuan Duan & Ming Lei & Eng Gee Lim & Pengfei Song, 2022. "The impact of short videos on student performance in an online-flipped college engineering course," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-10, December.
    3. Gaggero, Alessio & Haile, Getinet Astatike, 2019. "Does Class Size Matter in Postgraduate Education?," IZA Discussion Papers 12628, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

  3. In-Uck Park & Mike W. Peacey & Marcus R. Munafò, 2014. "Modelling the effects of subjective and objective decision making in scientific peer review," Nature, Nature, vol. 506(7486), pages 93-96, February.

    Cited by:

    1. Michail Kovanis & Ludovic Trinquart & Philippe Ravaud & Raphaël Porcher, 2017. "Evaluating alternative systems of peer review: a large-scale agent-based modelling approach to scientific publication," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 113(1), pages 651-671, October.
    2. Xiancheng Li & Wenge Rong & Haoran Shi & Jie Tang & Zhang Xiong, 2018. "The impact of conference ranking systems in computer science: a comparative regression analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 116(2), pages 879-907, August.
    3. Day, Theodore Eugene, 2015. "The big consequences of small biases: A simulation of peer review," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(6), pages 1266-1270.
    4. Michail Kovanis & Raphaël Porcher & Philippe Ravaud & Ludovic Trinquart, 2016. "The Global Burden of Journal Peer Review in the Biomedical Literature: Strong Imbalance in the Collective Enterprise," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(11), pages 1-14, November.
    5. Zhao, Zhi-Dan & Chen, Jiahao & Lu, Yichuan & Zhao, Na & Jiang, Dazhi & Wang, Bing-Hong, 2021. "Dynamic patterns of open review process," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 582(C).
    6. Stein J Janssen & Annelien L Bredenoord & Wouter Dhert & Marinus de Kleuver & F Cumhur Oner & Jorrit-Jan Verlaan, 2015. "Potential Conflicts of Interest of Editorial Board Members from Five Leading Spine Journals," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-11, June.
    7. Matan Shelomi, 2014. "Editorial Misconduct—Definition, Cases, and Causes," Publications, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-10, April.
    8. Yanwei Jia & Jussi Keppo & Ville Satopää, 2023. "Herding in Probabilistic Forecasts," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(5), pages 2713-2732, May.
    9. Gary A. Hoover & Christian Hopp, 2017. "What Crisis? Taking Stock of Management Researchers' Experiences with and Views of Scholarly Misconduct," CESifo Working Paper Series 6611, CESifo.
    10. Michail Kovanis & Raphaël Porcher & Philippe Ravaud & Ludovic Trinquart, 2016. "Complex systems approach to scientific publication and peer-review system: development of an agent-based model calibrated with empirical journal data," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 106(2), pages 695-715, February.
    11. Lin Zhang & Beibei Sun & Fei Shu & Ying Huang, 2022. "Comparing paper level classifications across different methods and systems: an investigation of Nature publications," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(12), pages 7633-7651, December.
    12. Janine Huisman & Jeroen Smits, 2017. "Duration and quality of the peer review process: the author’s perspective," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 113(1), pages 633-650, October.
    13. Hopp, Christian & Hoover, Gary A., 2017. "How prevalent is academic misconduct in management research?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 73-81.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Co-authorship network on CollEc

NEP Fields

NEP is an announcement service for new working papers, with a weekly report in each of many fields. This author has had 3 papers announced in NEP. These are the fields, ordered by number of announcements, along with their dates. If the author is listed in the directory of specialists for this field, a link is also provided.
  1. NEP-EDU: Education (2) 2015-04-19 2015-04-19
  2. NEP-HRM: Human Capital & Human Resource Management (1) 2015-04-19
  3. NEP-NET: Network Economics (1) 2016-06-25
  4. NEP-NEU: Neuroeconomics (1) 2016-06-25

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Mike W. Peacey should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.