The big consequences of small biases: A simulation of peer review
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
References listed on IDEAS
- Viner, Neil & Powell, Philip & Green, Rod, 2004. "Institutionalized biases in the award of research grants: a preliminary analysis revisiting the principle of accumulative advantage," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 443-454, April.
- Bornmann, Lutz & Mutz, Rüdiger & Daniel, Hans-Dieter, 2007. "Gender differences in grant peer review: A meta-analysis," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 1(3), pages 226-238.
CitationsCitations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- repec:spr:scient:v:113:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-017-2244-y is not listed on IDEAS
- Kapeller, Jakob & Steinerberger, Stefan, 2016.
"Emergent phenomena in scientific publishing: A simulation exercise,"
Elsevier, vol. 45(10), pages 1945-1952.
- Jakob Kapeller & Stefan Steinerberger, 2017. "Emergent phenomena in scientific publishing: A simulation exercise," ICAE Working Papers 66, Johannes Kepler University, Institute for Comprehensive Analysis of the Economy.
- Michail Kovanis & Raphaël Porcher & Philippe Ravaud & Ludovic Trinquart, 2016. "Complex systems approach to scientific publication and peer-review system: development of an agent-based model calibrated with empirical journal data," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 106(2), pages 695-715, February.
- Olgica Nedić & Aleksandar Dekanski, 2016. "Priority criteria in peer review of scientific articles," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 107(1), pages 15-26, April.
- Lina M. Cortés & Andrés Mora-Valencia & Javier Perote, 2016.
"The productivity of top researchers: a semi-nonparametric approach,"
Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 109(2), pages 891-915, November.
- Lina M. Cortés & Javier Perote & Andrés Mora-Valencia, 2016. "The productivity of top researchers: A semi-nonparametric approach," DOCUMENTOS DE TRABAJO CIEF 014437, UNIVERSIDAD EAFIT.
- Simone Righi & Károly Takács, 2017.
"The miracle of peer review and development in science: an agent-based model,"
Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 113(1), pages 587-607, October.
- Simone Righi & Karoly Takacs, 2016. "The Miracle of Peer Review and Development inScience: An Agent-Based Model," Center for the Analysis of Public Policies (CAPP) 0144, Universita di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Dipartimento di Economia "Marco Biagi".
More about this item
KeywordsBias; Discrete event simulation; Grant funding; Peer review;
StatisticsAccess and download statistics
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:respol:v:44:y:2015:i:6:p:1266-1270. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/respol .
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.