IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/f/ppe696.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Maikel Pellens

Personal Details

First Name:Maikel
Middle Name:
Last Name:Pellens
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:ppe696
Maikel Pellens Universiteit Gent Tweekerkenstraat 2 9000 Gent Belgie
Terminal Degree:2014 Onderzoekseenheid Bedrijfseconomie, Strategie en Innovatie; Faculteit Economie en Bedrijfswetenschappen; KU Leuven (from RePEc Genealogy)

Affiliation

(81%) Centre for Entrepreneurship Research
Faculteit Economie en Bedrijfskunde
Universiteit Gent

Gent, Belgium
https://www.ugent.be/eb/mio/cer/

++ 32 (0) 9 264 34 61
++ 32 (0) 9 264 35 92
Tweekerkenstraat 2, 9000 Gent
RePEc:edi:cergebe (more details at EDIRC)

(18%) Onderzoekseenheid Bedrijfseconomie, Strategie en Innovatie
Faculteit Economie en Bedrijfswetenschappen
KU Leuven

Leuven, Belgium
http://www.econ.kuleuven.be/msi/




RePEc:edi:mskulbe (more details at EDIRC)

(1%) Leibniz-Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung (ZEW)

Mannheim, Germany
http://www.zew.de/

+49/621/1235-01
+49/621/1235-224
L 7,1; D - 68161 Mannheim
RePEc:edi:zemande (more details at EDIRC)

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers Articles Books

Working papers

  1. Comin, Diego & Licht, Georg & Pellens, Maikel & Schubert, Torben, 2018. "Do Companies Benefit from Public Research Organizations? The Impact of the Fraunhofer Society in Germany," Papers in Innovation Studies 2018/7, Lund University, CIRCLE - Center for Innovation Research.
  2. Krieger, Bastian & Licht, Georg & Pellens, Maikel, 2018. "New perspectives in European innovation policy," ZEW policy briefs 7/2018, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
  3. Pellens, Maikel & Peters, Bettina & Hud, Martin & Rammer, Christian & Licht, Georg, 2018. "Public investment in R&D in reaction to economic crises: A longitudinal study for OECD countries," ZEW Discussion Papers 18-005, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
  4. Hussinger, Katrin & Pellens, Maikel, 2017. "Guilt by association: How scientific misconduct harms prior collaborators," ZEW Discussion Papers 17-051, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
  5. Pellens, Maikel & Licht, Georg, 2017. "Business angels: Crucial elements of the European financial ecosystem," ZEW policy briefs 5/2017, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
  6. Pellens, Maikel & Della Malva, Antonio, 2016. "Changing of the guard: Structural change and corporate science in the semiconductor industry," ZEW Discussion Papers 16-050, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
  7. Czarnitzki, Dirk & Grimpe, Christoph & Pellens, Maikel, 2014. "Access to research inputs: Open science versus the entrepreneurial university," ZEW Discussion Papers 14-018, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.

Articles

  1. Katrin Hussinger & Maikel Pellens, 2019. "Scientific misconduct and accountability in teams," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(5), pages 1-12, May.
  2. Hussinger, Katrin & Pellens, Maikel, 2019. "Guilt by association: How scientific misconduct harms prior collaborators," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 516-530.
  3. Maikel Pellens & Antonio Della Malva, 2018. "Corporate science, firm value, and vertical specialization: evidence from the semiconductor industry," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press, vol. 27(3), pages 489-505.
  4. Benjamin Balsmeier & Maikel Pellens, 2016. "How much does it cost to be a scientist?," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 469-505, June.
  5. Dirk Czarnitzki & Christoph Grimpe & Maikel Pellens, 2015. "Access to research inputs: open science versus the entrepreneurial university," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 40(6), pages 1050-1063, December.
  6. Julie Callaert & Maikel Pellens & Bart Looy, 2014. "Sources of inspiration? Making sense of scientific references in patents," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 98(3), pages 1617-1629, March.
  7. Balsmeier, Benjamin & Pellens, Maikel, 2014. "Who makes, who breaks: Which scientists stay in academe?," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 122(2), pages 229-232.

Books

  1. Ali, Sana & Berger, Marius & Botelho, Tiago & Duvy, Jean-Noël & Frencia, Chiara & Gluntz, Philippe & Delater, Aurélie & Licht, Georg & Losso, Jacopo & Pellens, Maikel, 2017. "Understanding the nature and impact of the business angels in funding research and innovation: Final report," ZEW Expertises, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research, number 181907, June.
  2. Anciaux, David & Neves, Eurico & van der Zee, Frans A. & van der Giessen, Annelieke & Rammer, Christ (ed.), 2016. "Mapping the regional embeddedness of the NMP programme: Final report of the project "RTD-NMP-2014-Mapping"," ZEW Expertises, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research, number 141311, June.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Working papers

  1. Comin, Diego & Licht, Georg & Pellens, Maikel & Schubert, Torben, 2018. "Do Companies Benefit from Public Research Organizations? The Impact of the Fraunhofer Society in Germany," Papers in Innovation Studies 2018/7, Lund University, CIRCLE - Center for Innovation Research.

    Cited by:

    1. Eleni Giannopoulou & Pierre-Jean Barlatier & Julien Penin, 2019. "Same but different? Research and technology organizations, universities and the innovation activities of firms," Post-Print hal-02180704, HAL.
    2. Bianchi, Francesco & Comin, Diego & Kung, Howard & Kind, Thilo & Matusche, Alexander, 2019. "Slow recoveries through fiscal austerity: New insights in the effects of fiscal austerity," ZEW policy briefs 2/2019, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    3. Sara Amoroso & Simone Vannuccini, 2019. "Teaming up with Large R&D Investors: Good or Bad for Knowledge Production and Diffusion?," JRC Working Papers on Corporate R&D and Innovation 2019-05, Joint Research Centre (Seville site).
    4. Quentin Plantec & Pascal Le Masson & Benoit Weil, 2019. "The role of participating in user-driven research projects on scholar's academic performances: a model through C-K design theory," Post-Print hal-02165721, HAL.
    5. Ziesemer, Thomas, 2019. "The effects of R&D subsidies and publicly performed R&D on business R&D: A survey," MERIT Working Papers 2019-036, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    6. Francesco Manaresi & Carlo Menon & Pietro Santoleri, 2020. "Supporting innovative entrepreneurship: an evaluation of the Italian "Start-up Act"," Mo.Fi.R. Working Papers 163, Money and Finance Research group (Mo.Fi.R.) - Univ. Politecnica Marche - Dept. Economic and Social Sciences.
    7. Krieger, Bastian & Licht, Georg & Pellens, Maikel, 2018. "New perspectives in European innovation policy," ZEW policy briefs 7/2018, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    8. Patrick Lehnert & Curdin Pfister & Dietmar Harhoff & Uschi Backes-Gellner, 2020. "Knowledge Complementarities and Patenting: Do New Universities of Applied Sciences Foster Regional Innovation?," Economics of Education Working Paper Series 0164, University of Zurich, Department of Business Administration (IBW).

  2. Krieger, Bastian & Licht, Georg & Pellens, Maikel, 2018. "New perspectives in European innovation policy," ZEW policy briefs 7/2018, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.

    Cited by:

    1. Bianchi, Francesco & Comin, Diego & Kung, Howard & Kind, Thilo & Matusche, Alexander, 2019. "Slow recoveries through fiscal austerity: New insights in the effects of fiscal austerity," ZEW policy briefs 2/2019, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    2. André Stel & Serhiy Lyalkov & Ana Millán & José María Millán, 2019. "The moderating role of IPR on the relationship between country-level R&D and individual-level entrepreneurial performance," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(5), pages 1427-1450, October.

  3. Pellens, Maikel & Peters, Bettina & Hud, Martin & Rammer, Christian & Licht, Georg, 2018. "Public investment in R&D in reaction to economic crises: A longitudinal study for OECD countries," ZEW Discussion Papers 18-005, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.

    Cited by:

    1. Isabel Busom & Jorge Vélez-Ospina, 2020. "Subsidising Innovation over the Business Cycle," SPRU Working Paper Series 2020-09, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    2. Alessandro Sterlacchini, 2017. "The intensity of business R&D in Italy: why reducing the gap with the EU is possible and worthwhile," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 44(2), pages 245-257, June.

  4. Hussinger, Katrin & Pellens, Maikel, 2017. "Guilt by association: How scientific misconduct harms prior collaborators," ZEW Discussion Papers 17-051, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.

    Cited by:

    1. March, Raymond J. & Geloso, Vincent, 2020. "Gordon Tullock meets Phineas Gage: The political economy of lobotomies in the United States," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(1).
    2. Mohan, Vijay, 2019. "On the use of blockchain-based mechanisms to tackle academic misconduct," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(9), pages 1-1.

  5. Czarnitzki, Dirk & Grimpe, Christoph & Pellens, Maikel, 2014. "Access to research inputs: Open science versus the entrepreneurial university," ZEW Discussion Papers 14-018, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.

    Cited by:

    1. Hottenrott, Hanna & Lawson, Cornelia, 2017. "Fishing for complementarities: Research grants and research productivity," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 1-38.
    2. Centobelli, Piera & Cerchione, Roberto & Esposito, Emilio & Shashi,, 2019. "Exploration and exploitation in the development of more entrepreneurial universities: A twisting learning path model of ambidexterity," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 172-194.
    3. Rajeev K. Goel & Devrim Göktepe-Hultén & Christoph Grimpe, 2017. "Who instigates university–industry collaborations? University scientists versus firm employees," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 503-524, March.
    4. Benedikt Fecher & Sascha Friesike & Marcel Hebing, 2015. "What Drives Academic Data Sharing?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(2), pages 1-25, February.
    5. Vicente-Saez, Ruben & Martinez-Fuentes, Clara, 2018. "Open Science now: A systematic literature review for an integrated definition," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 428-436.

Articles

  1. Hussinger, Katrin & Pellens, Maikel, 2019. "Guilt by association: How scientific misconduct harms prior collaborators," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 516-530.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  2. Maikel Pellens & Antonio Della Malva, 2018. "Corporate science, firm value, and vertical specialization: evidence from the semiconductor industry," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press, vol. 27(3), pages 489-505.

    Cited by:

    1. Roberto Camerani & Daniele Rotolo & Nicola Grassano, 2018. "Do Firms Publish? A Multi-Sectoral Analysis," SPRU Working Paper Series 2018-21, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    2. Lauriane Dewulf & Michele Cincera, 2018. "Academic Scientists: The Golden Opportunity For High-Tech Companies," iCite Working Papers 2018-030, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.

  3. Benjamin Balsmeier & Maikel Pellens, 2016. "How much does it cost to be a scientist?," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 469-505, June.

    Cited by:

    1. Barge-Gil, Andres & D'Este, Pablo & Herrera, Liliana, 2018. "Corporate scientists as the triggers of transitions towards firms' exploration research strategies," MPRA Paper 85415, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Hünermund, Paul & Czarnitzki, Dirk, 2016. "Estimating the local average treatment effect of R&D subsidies in a pan-European program," ZEW Discussion Papers 16-039, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.

  4. Dirk Czarnitzki & Christoph Grimpe & Maikel Pellens, 2015. "Access to research inputs: open science versus the entrepreneurial university," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 40(6), pages 1050-1063, December.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  5. Julie Callaert & Maikel Pellens & Bart Looy, 2014. "Sources of inspiration? Making sense of scientific references in patents," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 98(3), pages 1617-1629, March.

    Cited by:

    1. Masashi Shirabe, 2014. "Identifying SCI covered publications within non-patent references in U.S. utility patents," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 101(2), pages 999-1014, November.
    2. Ashish Arora & Sharon Belenzon & Honggi Lee, 2017. "Reversed Citations and the Localization of Knowledge Spillovers," NBER Working Papers 23036, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Leonardo Costa Ribeiro & Glenda Kruss & Gustavo Britto & Américo Tristão Bernardes & Eduardo Motta e Albuquerque, 2014. "A methodology for unveiling global innovation networks: patent citations as clues to cross border knowledge flows," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 101(1), pages 61-83, October.
    4. Ugo Rizzo & Nicolò Barbieri & Laura Ramaciotti & Demian Iannantuono, 2017. "The division of labour between academia and industry for the generation of radical inventions," SEEDS Working Papers 0817, SEEDS, Sustainability Environmental Economics and Dynamics Studies, revised Nov 2017.
    5. Joaquín M. Azagra-Caro & Elena M. Tur, 2018. "Examiner trust in applicants to the European Patent Office: country specificities," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 117(3), pages 1319-1348, December.
    6. Anthony F. J. Raan & Jos J. Winnink, 2018. "Do younger Sleeping Beauties prefer a technological prince?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 114(2), pages 701-717, February.
    7. Chul Lee & Gunno Park & Klaus Marhold & Jina Kang, 2017. "Top management team’s innovation-related characteristics and the firm’s explorative R&D: an analysis based on patent data," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 111(2), pages 639-663, May.
    8. Azagra-Caro,Joaquín M. & Tur,Elena M., 2014. "Examiner amendments to applications to the european patent office: Procedures, knowledge bases and country specificities," INGENIO (CSIC-UPV) Working Paper Series 201406, INGENIO (CSIC-UPV), revised 29 Nov 2018.
    9. Michaël Bikard & Matt Marx, 2020. "Bridging Academia and Industry: How Geographic Hubs Connect University Science and Corporate Technology," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(8), pages 3425-3443, August.
    10. Ke, Qing, 2020. "Technological impact of biomedical research: The role of basicness and novelty," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(7).
    11. Basse Mama, Houdou, 2018. "Nonlinear capital market payoffs to science-led innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(6), pages 1084-1095.
    12. Naomi Fukuzawa & Takanori Ida, 2016. "Science linkages between scientific articles and patents for leading scientists in the life and medical sciences field: the case of Japan," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 106(2), pages 629-644, February.
    13. Ke, Qing, 2018. "Comparing scientific and technological impact of biomedical research," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 706-717.
    14. Veugelers, Reinhilde & Wang, Jian, 2019. "Scientific novelty and technological impact," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(6), pages 1362-1372.
    15. Tahamtan, Iman & Bornmann, Lutz, 2018. "Creativity in science and the link to cited references: Is the creative potential of papers reflected in their cited references?," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 906-930.
    16. Tan Tran, 2020. "R&D and Knowledge Expertise of French Regions," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2004, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Feb 2020.
    17. Du, Jian & Li, Peixin & Guo, Qianying & Tang, Xiaoli, 2019. "Measuring the knowledge translation and convergence in pharmaceutical innovation by funding-science-technology-innovation linkages analysis," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 132-148.

  6. Balsmeier, Benjamin & Pellens, Maikel, 2014. "Who makes, who breaks: Which scientists stay in academe?," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 122(2), pages 229-232.

    Cited by:

    1. Esteban Lafuente & Jasmina Berbegal-Mirabent, 2019. "Assessing the productivity of technology transfer offices: an analysis of the relevance of aspiration performance and portfolio complexity," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 778-801, June.
    2. Hottenrott, Hanna & Lawson, Cornelia, 2015. "Flying the nest: How the home department shapes researchers' career paths," DICE Discussion Papers 153 [rev.], University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).
    3. Carolina Cañibano & Richard Woolley & Eric J. Iversen & Sybille Hinze & Stefan Hornbostel & Jakob Tesch, 2019. "A conceptual framework for studying science research careers," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(6), pages 1964-1992, December.
    4. Benjamin Balsmeier & Maikel Pellens, 2016. "How much does it cost to be a scientist?," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 469-505, June.
    5. Conti, Annamaria & Visentin, Fabiana, 2015. "A revealed preference analysis of PhD students’ choices over employment outcomes," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(10), pages 1931-1947.
    6. Shmatko, Natalia & Katchanov, Yurij & Volkova, Galina, 2020. "The value of PhD in the changing world of work: Traditional and alternative research careers," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    7. Dominik P. Heinisch & Guido Buenstorf, 2018. "The next generation (plus one): an analysis of doctoral students’ academic fecundity based on a novel approach to advisor identification," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 117(1), pages 351-380, October.
    8. Fudickar, Roman & Hottenrott, Hanna & Lawson, Cornelia, 2016. "What’s the price of consulting? Effects of public and private sector consulting on academic research," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis LEI & BRICK - Laboratory of Economics of Innovation "Franco Momigliano", Bureau of Research in Innovation, Complexity and Knowledge, Collegio 201602, University of Turin.
    9. Jeongeun Kim & Molly Ott & Lindsey Dippold, 2020. "University and Department Influences on Scientists’ Occupational Outcomes," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 61(2), pages 197-228, March.
    10. Andrea Seidl & Stefan Wrzaczek & Fouad El Ouardighi & Gustav Feichtinger, 2016. "Optimal Career Strategies and Brain Drain in Academia," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 168(1), pages 268-295, January.

Books

  1. Ali, Sana & Berger, Marius & Botelho, Tiago & Duvy, Jean-Noël & Frencia, Chiara & Gluntz, Philippe & Delater, Aurélie & Licht, Georg & Losso, Jacopo & Pellens, Maikel, 2017. "Understanding the nature and impact of the business angels in funding research and innovation: Final report," ZEW Expertises, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research, number 181907, June.

    Cited by:

    1. Pellens, Maikel & Licht, Georg, 2017. "Business angels: Crucial elements of the European financial ecosystem," ZEW policy briefs 5/2017, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    2. Gvetadze, Salome & Pal, Kristian & Torfs, Wouter, 2020. "The business angel portfolio under the European Angels Fund: An empirical analysis," EIF Working Paper Series 2020/62, European Investment Fund (EIF).

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Co-authorship network on CollEc

NEP Fields

NEP is an announcement service for new working papers, with a weekly report in each of many fields. This author has had 8 papers announced in NEP. These are the fields, ordered by number of announcements, along with their dates. If the author is listed in the directory of specialists for this field, a link is also provided.
  1. NEP-INO: Innovation (7) 2014-03-30 2016-07-23 2018-01-01 2018-02-26 2018-03-19 2018-11-05 2019-04-01. Author is listed
  2. NEP-SBM: Small Business Management (4) 2018-01-01 2018-03-19 2018-11-05 2019-04-01. Author is listed
  3. NEP-TID: Technology & Industrial Dynamics (4) 2016-07-23 2018-02-26 2018-03-19 2019-04-01. Author is listed
  4. NEP-CSE: Economics of Strategic Management (3) 2018-03-19 2018-11-05 2019-04-01. Author is listed
  5. NEP-EFF: Efficiency & Productivity (3) 2016-07-23 2018-03-19 2019-04-01. Author is listed
  6. NEP-ENT: Entrepreneurship (2) 2014-03-30 2018-01-01. Author is listed
  7. NEP-EUR: Microeconomic European Issues (2) 2018-03-19 2019-04-01. Author is listed
  8. NEP-PPM: Project, Program & Portfolio Management (2) 2018-03-19 2019-04-01. Author is listed
  9. NEP-EDU: Education (1) 2017-12-11
  10. NEP-EEC: European Economics (1) 2018-02-26
  11. NEP-SOG: Sociology of Economics (1) 2014-03-30

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Maikel Pellens should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.