IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/f/ppe638.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Annarosa Pesole

Personal Details

First Name:Annarosa
Middle Name:
Last Name:Pesole
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:ppe638
[This author has chosen not to make the email address public]
annarosa.pesole@ec.europa.eu
+34/954488299

Affiliation

(99%) Joint Research Centre
European Commission

Sevilla, Spain
https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/about/jrc-site/seville
RePEc:edi:ipjrces (more details at EDIRC)

(1%) LUISS Lab of European Economics
Libera Università Internazionale degli Studi Sociali Guido Carli (LUISS)

Roma, Italy
http://www.luiss.edu/dptea/research-centers/luiss-lab-european-economics
RePEc:edi:llluiit (more details at EDIRC)

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers Articles

Working papers

  1. Songul Tolan & Annarosa Pesole & Fernando Martinez-Plumed & Enrique Fernandez-Macias & José Hernandez-Orallo & Emilia Gomez, 2020. "Measuring the Occupational Impact of AI: Tasks, Cognitive Abilities and AI Benchmarks," JRC Working Papers on Labour, Education and Technology 2020-02, Joint Research Centre.
  2. Maria Cesira Urzi Brancati & Annarosa Pesole & Enrique Férnandéz-Macías, 2020. "New evidence on platform workers in Europe: Results from the second COLLEEM survey," JRC Research Reports JRC118570, Joint Research Centre.
  3. Andre Jungmittag & Annarosa Pesole, 2019. "The impact of robots on labour productivity: A panel data approach covering 9 industries and 12 countries," JRC Working Papers on Labour, Education and Technology 2019-08, Joint Research Centre.
  4. Ignacio Gonzalez Vazquez & Santo Milasi & Stephanie Carretero Gomez & Joanna Napierala & Nicolas Robledo Bottcher & Koen Jonkers & Xabier Goenaga Beldarrain & Eskarne Arregui Pabollet & Margherita Bac, 2019. "The changing nature of work and skills in the digital age," JRC Research Reports JRC117505, Joint Research Centre.
  5. Annarosa Pesole & Enrique Fernandez-Macias & Cesira Urzi Brancati & Estrella Gomez Herrera, 2019. "How to quantify what is not seen? Two proposals for measuring platform work," JRC Working Papers on Labour, Education and Technology 2019-01, Joint Research Centre.
  6. Maria Cesira Urzi Brancati & Annarosa Pesole & Enrique Fernandez Macias, 2019. "Digital Labour Platforms in Europe: Numbers, Profiles, and Employment Status of Platform Workers," JRC Research Reports JRC117330, Joint Research Centre.
  7. Annarosa Pesole & Maria Cesira Urzi Brancati & Enrique Fernandez Macias & Federico Biagi & Ignacio Gonzalez Vazquez, 2018. "Platform Workers in Europe: Evidence from the COLLEEM Survey," JRC Research Reports JRC112157, Joint Research Centre.
  8. Daniel Nepelski & Marc Bogdanowicz & Federico Biagi & Paul Desruelle & Giuditta De Prato & Garry Gabison & Giuseppe Piroli & Annarosa Pesole & Nikolaus Thumm & Vincent Van Roy, 2017. "7 ways to boost digital innovation and entrepreneurship in Europe. Key messages from the European innovation policies for the digital shift project," JRC Research Reports JRC104899, Joint Research Centre.
  9. Annarosa Pesole, 2016. "Measures of the Contribution made by ICT to Innovation Output. An Update of the ICT Innovation Output Indicator," JRC Research Reports JRC100892, Joint Research Centre.
  10. Annarosa Pesole & Daniel Nepelski, 2016. "Universities and collaborative innovation in EC-funded research projects: An analysis based on Innovation Radar data," JRC Research Reports JRC104870, Joint Research Centre.
  11. Federico Biagi & Annarosa Pesole & Juraj Stancik, 2016. "Modes of ICT Innovation: Evidence from the Community Innovation Survey," JRC Research Reports JRC101636, Joint Research Centre.
  12. Annarosa Pesole, 2015. "How much does ICT contribute to innovation output? An analysis of the ICT component in the innovation output indicator," JRC Research Reports JRC94372, Joint Research Centre.
  13. Garry Gabison & Annarosa Pesole, 2014. "An Overview of Models of Distributed Innovation. Open Innovation, User Innovation, and Social Innovation," JRC Research Reports JRC93533, Joint Research Centre.
  14. Haskel, J & Pesole, A, 2011. "Productivity and innovation in UK financial services: an intangible assets approach," Working Papers 6825, Imperial College, London, Imperial College Business School.
  15. Haskel, J & Goodridge, P & Pesole, A & Dal Borgo, M, 2011. "Productivity and growth in UK industries: an intangible investment approach," Working Papers 9027, Imperial College, London, Imperial College Business School.
  16. Haskel, J & Clayton, T & Goodridge, P & Pesole, A & Barnett, D & Chamberlain, G & Jones, R & Khan, K & Turvey, A, 2010. "Innovation, knowledge spending and productivity growth in the UK: interim report for NESTA 'Innovation Index’ project," Working Papers 5279, Imperial College, London, Imperial College Business School.
  17. Haskel, J & Pesole, A & Galindo-Rueda, F, 2010. "How much does the UK employ, spend and invest in design?," Working Papers 5971, Imperial College, London, Imperial College Business School.

Articles

  1. Daniel Nepelski & Vincent Roy & Annarosa Pesole, 2019. "The organisational and geographic diversity and innovation potential of EU-funded research networks," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 359-380, April.
  2. Mariela Dal Borgo & Peter Goodridge & Jonathan Haskel & Annarosa Pesole, 2013. "Productivity and Growth in UK Industries: An Intangible Investment Approach," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 75(6), pages 806-834, December.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Working papers

  1. Songul Tolan & Annarosa Pesole & Fernando Martinez-Plumed & Enrique Fernandez-Macias & José Hernandez-Orallo & Emilia Gomez, 2020. "Measuring the Occupational Impact of AI: Tasks, Cognitive Abilities and AI Benchmarks," JRC Working Papers on Labour, Education and Technology 2020-02, Joint Research Centre.

    Cited by:

    1. Edward Felten & Manav Raj & Robert Seamans, 2021. "Occupational, industry, and geographic exposure to artificial intelligence: A novel dataset and its potential uses," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(12), pages 2195-2217, December.
    2. Bachmann, Ronald & Gonschor, Myrielle & Milasi, Santo & Mitra, Alessio, 2023. "Technological progress and the dynamics of self-employment: Worker-level evidence for Europe," Ruhr Economic Papers 1023, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.

  2. Maria Cesira Urzi Brancati & Annarosa Pesole & Enrique Férnandéz-Macías, 2020. "New evidence on platform workers in Europe: Results from the second COLLEEM survey," JRC Research Reports JRC118570, Joint Research Centre.

    Cited by:

    1. Paola Tubaro, 2022. "Social networks and resilience in emerging labor markets," Post-Print hal-03850444, HAL.
    2. Gabriel López-Martínez & Francisco Eduardo Haz-Gómez & José Eulogio Real Deus, 2023. "Are You Really Your Own Boss? Flexi-Vulnerability and False Consciousness of Autonomy in the Digital Labor Culture of Riders," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, July.
    3. Paolo Borghi & Annalisa Murgia & Mathilde Mondon-Navazo & Petr Mezihorak, 2021. "Mind the gap between discourses and practices: Platform workers’ representation in France and Italy," European Journal of Industrial Relations, , vol. 27(4), pages 425-443, December.
    4. Purificación López-Igual & Paula Rodríguez-Modroño, 2020. "Who is Teleworking and Where from? Exploring the Main Determinants of Telework in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-15, October.
    5. Luka Bulian, 2021. "The gig is up: who does gig economy actually benefit?," Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems - scientific journal, Croatian Interdisciplinary Society Provider Homepage: http://indecs.eu, vol. 19(1), pages 106-119.
    6. Kool, Tamara & Bordon, Giulio & Gassmann, Franziska, 2021. "Access to social protection for platform and other non-standard workers: A literature review," MERIT Working Papers 2021-002, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    7. Maciej Berk{e}sewicz & Dagmara Nikulin & Marcin Szymkowiak & Kamil Wilak, 2021. "The gig economy in Poland: evidence based on mobile big data," Papers 2106.12827, arXiv.org.
    8. Paola Tubaro & Clément Le Ludec & Antonio A. Casilli, 2020. "Counting ‘micro-workers’: societal and methodological challenges around new forms of labour," Post-Print hal-02898905, HAL.
    9. Cirillo, Valeria & Guarascio, Dario & Parolin, Zachary, 2021. "Platform Work and Economic Insecurity: Evidence from Italian Survey Data," GLO Discussion Paper Series 821, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    10. Sam Jones & Ivan Manhique, 2022. "Digital labour platforms as shock absorbers: Evidence from COVID-19," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2022-108, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    11. Cirillo, Valeria & Guarascio, Dario & Parolin, Zachary, 2023. "Platform work and economic insecurity in Italy," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 126-138.
    12. Valeria Cirillo & Dario Guarascio & Zachary Parolin, 2021. "Platform Work and Economic Insecurity: Evidence from Representative Italian Survey Data," Working Papers in Public Economics 208, University of Rome La Sapienza, Department of Economics and Law.

  3. Andre Jungmittag & Annarosa Pesole, 2019. "The impact of robots on labour productivity: A panel data approach covering 9 industries and 12 countries," JRC Working Papers on Labour, Education and Technology 2019-08, Joint Research Centre.

    Cited by:

    1. Jos'e-Ignacio Ant'on & Rudolf Winter-Ebmer & Enrique Fern'andez-Mac'ias, 2022. "Does robotization affect job quality? Evidence from European regional labour markets," Papers 2208.14248, arXiv.org.
    2. Septimiu Szabo, 2020. "Transition to Industry 4.0 in the Visegrád Countries," European Economy - Economic Briefs 052, Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN), European Commission.
    3. Andre Jungmittag, 2021. "Robotisation of the manufacturing industries in the EU: Convergence or divergence?," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(5), pages 1269-1290, October.
    4. Fernández-Macías, Enrique & Klenert, David & Antón, José-Ignacio, 2021. "Not so disruptive yet? Characteristics, distribution and determinants of robots in Europe," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 76-89.
    5. Saam Marianne, 2024. "The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Productivity and Employment – How Can We Assess It and What Can We Observe?," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Sciendo, vol. 59(1), pages 22-27, February.
    6. Zoltan Csefalvay & Petros Gkotsis, 2020. "Global race for robotisation - Looking at the entire robotisation chain," JRC Research Reports JRC121184, Joint Research Centre.
    7. Eder, Andreas & Koller, Wolfgang & Mahlberg, Bernhard, 2022. "The contribution of industrial robots to labor productivity growth and economic convergence: A production frontier approach," MPRA Paper 113126, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. MARSCHINSKI Robert & DE AMORES HERNANDEZ Antonio & AMOROSO Sara & BAUER Peter & CARDANI Roberta & CSEFALVAY Zoltan & GENTY Aurelien & GKOTSIS Petros & GREGORI Wildmer & GRASSANO Nicola & HERNANDEZ GUE, 2021. "EU competitiveness: recent trends, drivers, and links to economic policy: A Synthesis Report," JRC Research Reports JRC123232, Joint Research Centre.

  4. Ignacio Gonzalez Vazquez & Santo Milasi & Stephanie Carretero Gomez & Joanna Napierala & Nicolas Robledo Bottcher & Koen Jonkers & Xabier Goenaga Beldarrain & Eskarne Arregui Pabollet & Margherita Bac, 2019. "The changing nature of work and skills in the digital age," JRC Research Reports JRC117505, Joint Research Centre.

    Cited by:

    1. Irene Arcelay & Aitor Goti & Aitor Oyarbide-Zubillaga & Tugce Akyazi & Elisabete Alberdi & Pablo Garcia-Bringas, 2021. "Definition of the Future Skills Needs of Job Profiles in the Renewable Energy Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-23, May.
    2. Munoz de Bustillo Llorente Rafael & FERNANDEZ MACIAS Enrique & GONZALEZ VAZQUEZ Ignacio, 2020. "Universality in Social Protection: An Inquiry about its Meaning and Measurement," JRC Research Reports JRC122953, Joint Research Centre.
    3. Robert Szydło & Sylwia Wiśniewska & Małgorzata Tyrańska & Anna Dolot & Urszula Bukowska & Marek Koczyński, 2021. "Employer Expectations Regarding the Competencies of Employees on the Energy Market in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-21, November.
    4. Dana Ichim Somogyi, 2020. "Romania’s Labor Market Prospects: Indicators for 2010 – 2020 and Estimates for 2030," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(2), pages 347-354, December.
    5. Mueller-Langer, Frank & Gómez-Herrera, Estrella, 2022. "Mobility restrictions and the substitution between on-site and remote work: Empirical evidence from a European online labour market," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).

  5. Annarosa Pesole & Enrique Fernandez-Macias & Cesira Urzi Brancati & Estrella Gomez Herrera, 2019. "How to quantify what is not seen? Two proposals for measuring platform work," JRC Working Papers on Labour, Education and Technology 2019-01, Joint Research Centre.

    Cited by:

    1. Csaba Mako & Miklos Illessy & Jozsef Pap & Saeed Nosratabadi, 2021. "Emerging Platform Work in the Context of the Regulatory Loophole (The Uber Fiasco in Hungary)," Papers 2105.05651, arXiv.org.
    2. Maria Cesira Urzi Brancati & Annarosa Pesole & Enrique Férnandéz-Macías, 2020. "New evidence on platform workers in Europe: Results from the second COLLEEM survey," JRC Research Reports JRC118570, Joint Research Centre.
    3. Makó, Csaba & Illéssy, Miklós & Pap, József, 2020. "Munkavégzés a platformalapú gazdaságban. A foglalkoztatás egy lehetséges modellje? [Work on the digital platform economy. Towards a new employment model for the future?]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(11), pages 1112-1129.

  6. Maria Cesira Urzi Brancati & Annarosa Pesole & Enrique Fernandez Macias, 2019. "Digital Labour Platforms in Europe: Numbers, Profiles, and Employment Status of Platform Workers," JRC Research Reports JRC117330, Joint Research Centre.

    Cited by:

    1. Melián-González, Santiago, 2022. "Gig economy delivery services versus professional service companies: Consumers’ perceptions of food-delivery services," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    2. Maria Cesira Urzi Brancati & Annarosa Pesole & Enrique Férnandéz-Macías, 2020. "New evidence on platform workers in Europe: Results from the second COLLEEM survey," JRC Research Reports JRC118570, Joint Research Centre.
    3. Martindale, Nicholas & Lehdonvirta, Vili, 2021. "Can labour market digitalization increase social mobility? Evidence from a European survey of online platform workers," SocArXiv 54aqh, Center for Open Science.
    4. Boavida, Nuno & Moniz, António, 2019. "Work in digital platforms: Literature review and exploratory interviews in Portugal," MPRA Paper 108571, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Popan, Cosmin & Anaya-Boig, Esther, 2021. "The intersectional precarity of platform cycle delivery workers," SocArXiv tk6v8, Center for Open Science.
    6. Paola Tubaro & Clément Le Ludec & Antonio A. Casilli, 2020. "Counting ‘micro-workers’: societal and methodological challenges around new forms of labour," Post-Print hal-02898905, HAL.

  7. Annarosa Pesole & Maria Cesira Urzi Brancati & Enrique Fernandez Macias & Federico Biagi & Ignacio Gonzalez Vazquez, 2018. "Platform Workers in Europe: Evidence from the COLLEEM Survey," JRC Research Reports JRC112157, Joint Research Centre.

    Cited by:

    1. Verdin, Rachel & O'Reilly, Jacqueline, 2021. "A gender agenda for the future of work in a digital age of pandemics: Jobs, skills and contracts," WSI Studies 24, The Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI), Hans Böckler Foundation.
    2. Malo Mofakhami, 2021. "Is Innovation Good for European Workers? Beyond the Employment Destruction/Creation Effects, Technology Adoption Affects the Working Conditions of European Workers," Post-Print hal-03282887, HAL.
    3. Werner Hölzl & Susanne Bärenthaler-Sieber & Julia Bock-Schappelwein & Klaus S. Friesenbichler & Agnes Kügler & Andreas Reinstaller & Peter Reschenhofer & Bernhard Dachs & Martin Risak, 2019. "Digitalisation in Austria. State of Play and Reform Needs," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 61892, April.
    4. Francesco Bogliacino & Valeria Cirillo & Cristiano Codagnone & Marta Fana & Francisco Lupiáñez-Villanueva & Giuseppe A Veltri, 2019. "Shaping Individual Preferences for Social Protection: The Case of Platform Workers," Documentos de Trabajo, Escuela de Economía 17293, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, FCE, CID.
    5. Cantarella, Michele & Strozzi, Chiara, 2019. "Workers in the Crowd: The Labour Market Impact of the Online Platform Economy," IZA Discussion Papers 12327, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    6. Maria Cesira Urzi Brancati & Annarosa Pesole & Enrique Fernandez Macias, 2019. "Digital Labour Platforms in Europe: Numbers, Profiles, and Employment Status of Platform Workers," JRC Research Reports JRC117330, Joint Research Centre.
    7. Purificación López-Igual & Paula Rodríguez-Modroño, 2020. "Who is Teleworking and Where from? Exploring the Main Determinants of Telework in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-15, October.
    8. Mukhopadhyay, Boidurjo Rick & Chatwin, Chris R., 2021. "The Significance of Herzberg and Taylor for the Gig Economy of China: Evaluating Gigger Incentives for Meituan and Ele.me," GLO Discussion Paper Series 849, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    9. Anne Aguilera & Laetitia Dablanc & Alain Rallet, 2022. "Digital work and urban delivery: Profile, activity and mobility practices of on-demand food delivery couriers in Paris (France)," Post-Print hal-03946497, HAL.
    10. Judite Gonçalves & Pedro S. Martins, 2021. "Effects of self-employment on hospitalizations: instrumental variables analysis of social security data," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 57(3), pages 1527-1543, October.
    11. Dominique MÉDA, 2019. "Three scenarios for the future of work," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 158(4), pages 627-652, December.
    12. Uddén Sonnegård, Eva, 2021. "Ratio Working Paper No. 350: A quickly transforming labour market," Ratio Working Papers 350, The Ratio Institute.
    13. Kool, Tamara & Bordon, Giulio & Gassmann, Franziska, 2021. "Access to social protection for platform and other non-standard workers: A literature review," MERIT Working Papers 2021-002, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    14. Antonio Menor-Campos & María de los Baños García-Moreno & Tomás López-Guzmán & Amalia Hidalgo-Fernández, 2019. "Effects of Collaborative Economy: A Reflection," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-13, May.
    15. Paola Tubaro & Clément Le Ludec & Antonio A. Casilli, 2020. "Counting ‘micro-workers’: societal and methodological challenges around new forms of labour," Post-Print hal-02898905, HAL.
    16. Corinna Funke & Georg Picot, 2021. "Platform work in a Coordinated Market Economy," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(4), pages 348-363, July.
    17. Bogliacino, Francesco & Codagnone, Cristiano & Cirillo, Valeria & Guarascio, Dario, 2019. "Quantity and quality of work in the platform economy," GLO Discussion Paper Series 420, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    18. Cirillo, Valeria & Guarascio, Dario & Parolin, Zachary, 2023. "Platform work and economic insecurity in Italy," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 126-138.
    19. Heiland, Heiner, 2020. "Workers' Voice in platform labour: An Overview," WSI Studies 21, The Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI), Hans Böckler Foundation.
    20. Dumančić, Kosjenka & Čeh Časni, Anita, 2021. "The State of the Sharing Economy in Croatia: Legal Framework and Impact on Various Economic Sectors," MPRA Paper 110230, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    21. Gonçalves, Judite & Martins, Pedro S., 2018. "The effect of self-employment on health: Instrumental variables analysis of longitudinal social security data," GLO Discussion Paper Series 245, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    22. DUCH BROWN Nestor & GOMEZ-HERRERA Estrella & MUELLER-LANGER Frank & TOLAN Songul, 2022. "Market Power and Artificial Intelligence Work on Online Labour Markets," JRC Working Papers on Digital Economy 2021-10, Joint Research Centre.
    23. Mueller-Langer, Frank & Gómez-Herrera, Estrella, 2022. "Mobility restrictions and the substitution between on-site and remote work: Empirical evidence from a European online labour market," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    24. Daniel Erdsiek, 2021. "Unternehmen setzen verstärkt auf Crowdworking [Companies increasingly rely on crowdworking]," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 101(11), pages 912-914, November.

  8. Annarosa Pesole & Daniel Nepelski, 2016. "Universities and collaborative innovation in EC-funded research projects: An analysis based on Innovation Radar data," JRC Research Reports JRC104870, Joint Research Centre.

    Cited by:

    1. Daniel Nepelski & Vincent Roy, 2021. "Innovation and innovator assessment in R&I ecosystems: the case of the EU Framework Programme," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(3), pages 792-827, June.
    2. Daniel Nepelski & Giuseppe Piroli, 2018. "Organizational diversity and innovation potential of EU-funded research projects," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 615-639, June.
    3. Vincent Van Roy & Daniel Nepelski, 2017. "Determinants of high-tech entrepreneurship in Europe," JRC Research Reports JRC104865, Joint Research Centre.
    4. Daniel Nepelski & Vincent Roy & Annarosa Pesole, 2019. "The organisational and geographic diversity and innovation potential of EU-funded research networks," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 359-380, April.
    5. Daniel Nepelski & Marc Bogdanowicz & Federico Biagi & Paul Desruelle & Giuditta De Prato & Garry Gabison & Giuseppe Piroli & Annarosa Pesole & Nikolaus Thumm & Vincent Van Roy, 2017. "7 ways to boost digital innovation and entrepreneurship in Europe. Key messages from the European innovation policies for the digital shift project," JRC Research Reports JRC104899, Joint Research Centre.
    6. Vincent Van Roy & Daniel Nepelski, 2018. "Validation of the Innovation Radar assessment framework," JRC Research Reports JRC110926, Joint Research Centre.

  9. Federico Biagi & Annarosa Pesole & Juraj Stancik, 2016. "Modes of ICT Innovation: Evidence from the Community Innovation Survey," JRC Research Reports JRC101636, Joint Research Centre.

    Cited by:

    1. Foreman-Peck, James & Zhou, Peng, 2022. "R&D subsidies and productivity in eastern European countries," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 46(2).
    2. Foreman-Peck, James & Zhou, Peng, 2021. "Innovation policy and performance of Eastern European Countries," Cardiff Economics Working Papers E2021/15, Cardiff University, Cardiff Business School, Economics Section.
    3. Andrea Renda, 2016. "Selecting and Designing European ICT Innovation Policies," JRC Research Reports JRC103661, Joint Research Centre.
    4. Vincent Van Roy & Daniel Nepelski, 2017. "Determinants of high-tech entrepreneurship in Europe," JRC Research Reports JRC104865, Joint Research Centre.
    5. Daniel Nepelski & Marc Bogdanowicz & Federico Biagi & Paul Desruelle & Giuditta De Prato & Garry Gabison & Giuseppe Piroli & Annarosa Pesole & Nikolaus Thumm & Vincent Van Roy, 2017. "7 ways to boost digital innovation and entrepreneurship in Europe. Key messages from the European innovation policies for the digital shift project," JRC Research Reports JRC104899, Joint Research Centre.

  10. Annarosa Pesole, 2015. "How much does ICT contribute to innovation output? An analysis of the ICT component in the innovation output indicator," JRC Research Reports JRC94372, Joint Research Centre.

    Cited by:

    1. Daniel Nepelski & Marc Bogdanowicz & Federico Biagi & Paul Desruelle & Giuditta De Prato & Garry Gabison & Giuseppe Piroli & Annarosa Pesole & Nikolaus Thumm & Vincent Van Roy, 2017. "7 ways to boost digital innovation and entrepreneurship in Europe. Key messages from the European innovation policies for the digital shift project," JRC Research Reports JRC104899, Joint Research Centre.

  11. Garry Gabison & Annarosa Pesole, 2014. "An Overview of Models of Distributed Innovation. Open Innovation, User Innovation, and Social Innovation," JRC Research Reports JRC93533, Joint Research Centre.

    Cited by:

    1. Andrea Renda, 2016. "Selecting and Designing European ICT Innovation Policies," JRC Research Reports JRC103661, Joint Research Centre.

  12. Haskel, J & Pesole, A, 2011. "Productivity and innovation in UK financial services: an intangible assets approach," Working Papers 6825, Imperial College, London, Imperial College Business School.

    Cited by:

    1. Mariela Dal Borgo & Peter Goodridge & Jonathan Haskel & Annarosa Pesole, 2013. "Productivity and Growth in UK Industries: An Intangible Investment Approach," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 75(6), pages 806-834, December.
    2. Peter Goodridge & Jonathan Haskel, 2022. "Accounting for the slowdown in UK innovation and productivity," Working Papers 022, The Productivity Institute.
    3. Haskel, J & Goodridge, P & Wallis, G, 2012. "Spillovers from R&D and other intangible investment: evidence from UK industries," Working Papers 40107, Imperial College, London, Imperial College Business School.

  13. Haskel, J & Goodridge, P & Pesole, A & Dal Borgo, M, 2011. "Productivity and growth in UK industries: an intangible investment approach," Working Papers 9027, Imperial College, London, Imperial College Business School.

    Cited by:

    1. Peter Goodridge & Jonathan Haskel, 2022. "Accounting for the slowdown in UK innovation and productivity," Working Papers 022, The Productivity Institute.
    2. Sandro Montresor & Antonio Vezzani, 2016. "Intangible investments and innovation propensity: Evidence from the Innobarometer 2013," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(4), pages 331-352, May.
    3. Haskel, J & Goodridge, P & Wallis, G, 2012. "Spillovers from R&D and other intangible investment: evidence from UK industries," Working Papers 40107, Imperial College, London, Imperial College Business School.
    4. Fabio Landini & Alessandro Arrighetti & Andrea Lasagni, 2020. "Economic crisis and firm exit: do intangibles matter?," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(5), pages 445-479, May.
    5. Fındık, Derya & Tansel, Aysit, 2013. "Intangible investment and technical efficiency: The case of software-intensive manufacturing firms in Turkey," MPRA Paper 66165, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 05 Aug 2014.
    6. Millard, Stephen & Nicolae, Anamaria, 2014. "The effect of the financial crisis on TFP growth: a general equilibrium approach," Bank of England working papers 502, Bank of England.
    7. Bajgar, Matej & Berlingieri, Giuseppe & Calligaris, Sara & Criscuolo, Chiara & Timmis, Jonathan, 2019. "Industry concentration in Europe and North America," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 103427, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Haskel, J & Corrado, C & Jona-Lasinio, C & Iommi, M, 2012. "Intangible capital and growth in advanced economies: measurement methods and comparative results," Working Papers 9913, Imperial College, London, Imperial College Business School.
    9. Peter Mayerhofer & Michael Klien, 2016. "Unternehmensinvestitionen in den österreichischen Bundesländern. Entwicklung – Struktur – Funktion regionaler Förderung," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 61950, April.
    10. Nicholas Crafts, 2013. "Returning to Growth: Policy Lessons from History," Fiscal Studies, Institute for Fiscal Studies, vol. 34(2), pages 255-282, June.
    11. Nakatani, Ryota, 2021. "Total factor productivity enablers in the ICT industry: A cross-country firm-level analysis," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(9).
    12. Crafts, Nicholas, 2012. "Creating Competitive Advantage: Policy Lessons from History," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 91, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    13. Hyunbae Chun & M. Ishaq Nadiri, 2016. "Intangible Investment and Changing Sources of Growth in Korea," The Japanese Economic Review, Springer, vol. 67(1), pages 50-76, March.
    14. Murat Ocak & Derya Fındık, 2019. "The Impact of Intangible Assets and Sub-Components of Intangible Assets on Sustainable Growth and Firm Value: Evidence from Turkish Listed Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-23, September.
    15. Haskel, Jonathan & Iommi, Massimiliano, 2012. "Intangible Capital and Growth in Advanced Economies: Measurement and Comparative Results," CEPR Discussion Papers 9061, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    16. Szalavetz, Andrea, 2012. "Az immateriális beruházások és a nem közvetlenül a termelésben foglalkoztatottak szerepe a gazdasági felzárkózásban [The role intangible investments and non-production workers play in economic catc," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(11), pages 1187-1206.
    17. Oulton, Nicholas & Wallis, Gavin, 2015. "Integrated estimates of capital stocks and services for the United Kingdom: 1950-2013," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 61697, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    18. Dan Corry & Anna Valero & John Van Reenen, 2011. "UK Economic Performance Since 1997: Growth, Productivity and Jobs," CEP Reports 24, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    19. Andrin Spescha & Martin Woerter, 2021. "Research and development as an initiator of fixed capital investment," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 117-145, January.
    20. Carol Coorado & Jonathan Haskel & Cecilia Iona Lasinio & Massimiliano Iommi, 2012. "Intangible Capital and Growth Strategies for Advanced Economies: Measurement and Comparative Results," Working Papers LuissLab 12101, Dipartimento di Economia e Finanza, LUISS Guido Carli.
    21. Chen, Wen & Niebel, Thomas & Saam, Marianne, 2016. "Are intangibles more productive in ICT-intensive industries? Evidence from EU countries," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(5), pages 471-484.
    22. Siedschlag, Iulia & Di Ubaldo, Mattia, 2017. "The impact of investment in knowledge-based capital on productivity: firm-level evidence from Ireland," Papers WP556, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    23. Jun Du & Yama Temouri, 2015. "High-growth firms and productivity: evidence from the United Kingdom," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 44(1), pages 123-143, January.
    24. Antonelli, Cristiano & Orsatti, Gianluca & Pialli, Guido, 2023. "Out of Equilibrium and Intangible Assets," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis. Working Papers 202323, University of Turin.
    25. Shenglang Yang, 2016. "Intangible capital and sectoral energy intensity: Evidence from 40 economies," ANU Working Papers in Economics and Econometrics 2016-646, Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics.
    26. Don J Webber & Gail A Webber & Sebastian Berger & Peter Bradley, 2018. "Explaining productivity in a poor productivity region," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 50(1), pages 157-174, February.
    27. Malik, Kashif Zaheer & Ali, Syed Zahid & Khalid, Ahmed M., 2014. "Intangible capital in a real business cycle model," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 32-48.
    28. Shenglang Yang & Yixiao Zhou & Ligang Song, 2018. "Determinants of Intangible Investment and Its Impacts on Firms' Productivity: Evidence from Chinese Private Manufacturing Firms," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 26(6), pages 1-26, November.
    29. Schubert, Torben & Jäger, Angela & Türkeli, Serdar & Visentin, Fabiana, 2020. "Addressing the productivity paradox with big data: A literature review and adaptation of the CDM econometric model," MERIT Working Papers 2020-050, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    30. Alexander Ebner & Fabian Bocek, 2015. "Best Practices as to How to Support Investment in Intangible Assets. WWWforEurope Working Paper No. 101," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 58258, April.
    31. Jonathan Haskel, 2015. "Understanding innovation better: an intangible investment approach," Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 13-23, March.
    32. Oulton, Nicholas & Wallis, Gavin, 2016. "Capital stocks and capital services: Integrated and consistent estimates for the United Kingdom, 1950–2013," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 117-125.
    33. Nicholas Oulton, 2017. "The mystery of TFP," Economic Statistics Centre of Excellence (ESCoE) Discussion Papers ESCoE DP-2017-02, Economic Statistics Centre of Excellence (ESCoE).
    34. Haskel, J & Goodridge, P & Hughes, A & Wallis, G, 2015. "The contribution of public and private R&D to UK productivity growth," Working Papers 21171, Imperial College, London, Imperial College Business School.
    35. Goodridge, PR & Haskel, J & Wallis, G, 2014. "The UK productivity puzzle is a TFP puzzle: current data and future predictions," Working Papers 18381, Imperial College, London, Imperial College Business School.
    36. Peter Goodridge, 2013. "Measuring the creative economy," Chapters, in: Ruth Towse & Christian Handke (ed.), Handbook on the Digital Creative Economy, chapter 15, pages 162-177, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    37. Siedschlag, Iulia & Lawless, Martina & Di Ubaldo, Mattia, 2017. "Investment in knowledge-based capital and its contribution to productivity growth: a review of international and Irish evidence," Research Series, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), number BKMNEXT336, June.
    38. Yang, Shenglang & Shi, Xunpeng, 2018. "Intangible capital and sectoral energy intensity: Evidence from 40 economies between 1995 and 2007," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 118-128.
    39. Goodridge, PR & Haskel, J, 2015. "How does big data affect GDP? Theory and evidence for the UK," Working Papers 25156, Imperial College, London, Imperial College Business School.
    40. A. Arrighetti & F. Landini & A. Lasagni, 2015. "Firms’economic crisis and firm exit: do intangibles matters?," Economics Department Working Papers 2015-EP04, Department of Economics, Parma University (Italy).
    41. Carolina Hintzmann & Josep Lladós-Masllorens & Raul Ramos, 2021. "Intangible Assets and Labor Productivity Growth," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-21, May.
    42. Mattia Di Ubaldo & Iulia Siedschlag, 2021. "Investment in Knowledge‐Based Capital and Productivity: Firm‐Level Evidence from a Small Open Economy," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 67(2), pages 363-393, June.
    43. Bryson, Alex & Dale-Olsen, Harald, 2020. "Unions, Tripartite Competition and Innovation," IZA Discussion Papers 13015, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    44. Roth, Felix & Sen, Ali, 2021. "Intangible Capital and Labor Productivity Growth: Revisiting the Evidence," Hamburg Discussion Papers in International Economics 10, University of Hamburg, Department of Economics.
    45. Goodridge, PR, 2014. "Film, television & radio, books, music and art: estimating UK investment in artistic originals," Working Papers 12918, Imperial College, London, Imperial College Business School.
    46. Cristiano Antonelli & Gianluca Orsatti & Guido Pialli, 2023. "The knowledge-intensive direction of technological change," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 13(1), pages 1-27, March.
    47. Marek Pekarčík & Júlia Ďurčová & Jozef Glova, 2022. "Intangible ICT and Their Importance within Global Value Chains: An Empirical Analysis Based on Longitudinal Data Regression," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-14, April.
    48. Rammer, Christian & Köhler, Christian, 2012. "Innovationen, Anlageinvestitionen und immaterielle Investitionen," ZEW Discussion Papers 12-085, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    49. Elif Bascavusoglu-Moreau & Qian Cher Li, 2013. "Knowledge Spillovers & Sources of Knowledge in the Manufacturing Sector: Literature Review & Empirical Evidence for the UK," Working Papers wp451, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
    50. Hyunchul Lee & Kyungtag Lee & Jong Ha Lee, 2021. "The Various Effects of Technology Trade on the Sustainable Market Value of Firms in OECD Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-20, November.
    51. Pierluigi Catalfo, 2014. "Measuring and visualizing Local Authorities Relational Capital for internal control," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(2), pages 23-43.
    52. Roth, Felix, 2019. "Intangible Capital and Labour Productivity Growth: A Review of the Literature," Hamburg Discussion Papers in International Economics 4, University of Hamburg, Department of Economics.
    53. Roth, Felix, 2022. "Intangible Capital and Labor Productivity Growth – Revisiting the Evidence: An Update," Hamburg Discussion Papers in International Economics 11, University of Hamburg, Department of Economics.
    54. Matej Bajgar & Chiara Criscuolo & Jonathan Timmis, 2021. "Intangibles and industry concentration: Supersize me," OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 2021/12, OECD Publishing.
    55. Emmanuel Adu‐Ameyaw & Albert Danso & Linda Hickson, 2022. "Growth opportunity and investment policy: The role of managerial incentives," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(8), pages 3634-3646, December.

  14. Haskel, J & Clayton, T & Goodridge, P & Pesole, A & Barnett, D & Chamberlain, G & Jones, R & Khan, K & Turvey, A, 2010. "Innovation, knowledge spending and productivity growth in the UK: interim report for NESTA 'Innovation Index’ project," Working Papers 5279, Imperial College, London, Imperial College Business School.

    Cited by:

    1. Mariela Dal Borgo & Peter Goodridge & Jonathan Haskel & Annarosa Pesole, 2013. "Productivity and Growth in UK Industries: An Intangible Investment Approach," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 75(6), pages 806-834, December.
    2. Haskel, Jonathan & Wallis, Gavin, 2010. "Public Support for Innovation, Intangible Investment and Productivity Growth in the UK Market Sector," IZA Discussion Papers 4772, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    3. Mikel Navarro Arancegui & Juan José Gibaja Martíns & Susana Franco Rodríguez & Asier Murciego Alonso, 2012. "Territorial Benchmarking Methodology: The Need to Identify Reference Regions," Chapters, in: Philip Cooke & Mario Davide Parrilli & José Luis Curbelo (ed.), Innovation, Global Change and Territorial Resilience, chapter 4, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Hewitt-Dundas, Nola & Roper, Stephen, 2011. "Creating advantage in peripheral regions: The role of publicly funded R&D centres," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 832-841, July.
    5. Giuliana Battisti & Paul Stoneman, 2019. "Defining and Measuring the Innovativeness of Firms," Economic Statistics Centre of Excellence (ESCoE) Discussion Papers ESCoE DP-2019-19, Economic Statistics Centre of Excellence (ESCoE).
    6. Szalavetz, Andrea, 2011. "Innovációvezérelt növekedés? [Innovation-driven growth?]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(5), pages 460-476.
    7. Katona, Klára, 2021. "A vállalati innováció fejlesztésének és elterjedésének hatása a magyar vállalatok teljesítményére [The effect of development and spillover of corporate innovation on the performance of Hungarian co," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(S11), pages 36-51.
    8. Dutz, Mark A. & O'Connell, Stephen D., 2013. "Productivity, innovation and growth in Sri Lanka : an empirical investigation," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6354, The World Bank.

  15. Haskel, J & Pesole, A & Galindo-Rueda, F, 2010. "How much does the UK employ, spend and invest in design?," Working Papers 5971, Imperial College, London, Imperial College Business School.

    Cited by:

    1. Mariela Dal Borgo & Peter Goodridge & Jonathan Haskel & Annarosa Pesole, 2013. "Productivity and Growth in UK Industries: An Intangible Investment Approach," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 75(6), pages 806-834, December.
    2. Haskel, J & Goodridge, P & Wallis, G, 2012. "Spillovers from R&D and other intangible investment: evidence from UK industries," Working Papers 40107, Imperial College, London, Imperial College Business School.
    3. Edquist, Harald, 2011. "Intangible Investment and the Swedish Manufacturing and Service Sector Paradox," Working Paper Series 863, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
    4. Edquist, Harald, 2009. "How Much does Sweden Invest in Intangible Assets?," Working Paper Series 785, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
    5. Moultrie, James & Livesey, Finbarr, 2014. "Measuring design investment in firms: Conceptual foundations and exploratory UK survey," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 570-587.
    6. Rahel Falk & Hasan Bakhshi & Martin Falk & Wilhelm Geiger & Susanne Karr & Catherine Keppel & Hannes Leo & Roland Spitzlinger, 2011. "Innovation and Competitiveness of the Creative Industries," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 41510, April.
    7. Peter Goodridge, 2013. "Measuring the creative economy," Chapters, in: Ruth Towse & Christian Handke (ed.), Handbook on the Digital Creative Economy, chapter 15, pages 162-177, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    8. Haskel, J & Goodridge, P & Wallis, G, 2014. "UK investment in intangible assets: Report for NESTA," Working Papers 12846, Imperial College, London, Imperial College Business School.
    9. Goodridge, PR, 2014. "Film, television & radio, books, music and art: estimating UK investment in artistic originals," Working Papers 12918, Imperial College, London, Imperial College Business School.

Articles

  1. Daniel Nepelski & Vincent Roy & Annarosa Pesole, 2019. "The organisational and geographic diversity and innovation potential of EU-funded research networks," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 359-380, April.

    Cited by:

    1. Christoph Grimpe & Wolfgang Sofka & Andreas P. Distel, 2022. "SME participation in research grant consortia—the emergence of coordinated attention in collaborative innovation," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 59(4), pages 1567-1592, December.
    2. Ding, Yixin & Wu, Jianfeng, 2022. "Overcoming openness paradox in open networks: A configurational approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 528-537.
    3. Anna Maria Lis & Marita McPhillips & Adrian Lis, 2020. "Sustainability of Cluster Organizations as Open Innovation Intermediaries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-16, December.
    4. James A. Cunningham & Paul O’Reilly & Daire Hooper & Daniel Nepelski & Vincent Van Roy, 2020. "The Role of Project Coordinators in European Commission Framework Programme Projects. Results of the Innovation Radar PC Survey in FP R&I Projects," JRC Research Reports JRC120015, Joint Research Centre.
    5. Chih-Hsing Sam Liu & Jun-You Lin & Sheng-Fang Chou, 2022. "Wielding a double-edged sword? JV investment geographic diversity and parent's innovation," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(6), pages 1783-1816, August.
    6. Gomes, Leonardo Augusto de Vasconcelos & Flechas, Ximena Alejandra & Facin, Ana Lucia Figueiredo & Borini, Felipe Mendes, 2021. "Ecosystem management: Past achievements and future promises," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    7. Vincent Van Roy & Daniel Nepelski, 2018. "Validation of the Innovation Radar assessment framework," JRC Research Reports JRC110926, Joint Research Centre.
    8. James Cunningham & Paul O'Reilly, 2019. "Roles and Responsibilities of Project Coordinators: A Contingency Model for Project Coordinator Effectiveness," JRC Research Reports JRC117576, Joint Research Centre.

  2. Mariela Dal Borgo & Peter Goodridge & Jonathan Haskel & Annarosa Pesole, 2013. "Productivity and Growth in UK Industries: An Intangible Investment Approach," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 75(6), pages 806-834, December.
    See citations under working paper version above.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Rankings

This author is among the top 5% authors according to these criteria:
  1. Number of Downloads through RePEc Services over the past 12 months

Co-authorship network on CollEc

NEP Fields

NEP is an announcement service for new working papers, with a weekly report in each of many fields. This author has had 12 papers announced in NEP. These are the fields, ordered by number of announcements, along with their dates. If the author is listed in the directory of specialists for this field, a link is also provided.
  1. NEP-CSE: Economics of Strategic Management (6) 2015-02-05 2015-02-22 2016-07-02 2016-07-30 2017-01-01 2017-05-21. Author is listed
  2. NEP-INO: Innovation (6) 2015-02-05 2015-02-22 2016-07-02 2016-07-30 2017-01-01 2017-05-21. Author is listed
  3. NEP-PAY: Payment Systems and Financial Technology (6) 2017-05-21 2018-07-23 2019-07-08 2019-10-07 2020-03-23 2020-05-18. Author is listed
  4. NEP-SBM: Small Business Management (6) 2015-02-05 2015-02-22 2016-07-02 2016-07-30 2017-01-01 2017-05-21. Author is listed
  5. NEP-EUR: Microeconomic European Issues (5) 2016-07-02 2016-07-30 2017-05-21 2018-07-23 2020-03-23. Author is listed
  6. NEP-ICT: Information and Communication Technologies (3) 2015-02-22 2019-07-08 2019-11-18
  7. NEP-KNM: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Economy (3) 2015-02-22 2016-07-02 2017-05-21
  8. NEP-TID: Technology and Industrial Dynamics (3) 2016-07-02 2016-07-30 2019-11-18
  9. NEP-PPM: Project, Program and Portfolio Management (2) 2017-01-01 2017-05-21
  10. NEP-BIG: Big Data (1) 2020-05-18
  11. NEP-CMP: Computational Economics (1) 2020-05-18
  12. NEP-EEC: European Economics (1) 2019-10-07
  13. NEP-EFF: Efficiency and Productivity (1) 2019-11-18
  14. NEP-ENT: Entrepreneurship (1) 2017-05-21
  15. NEP-HME: Heterodox Microeconomics (1) 2015-02-05
  16. NEP-LAB: Labour Economics (1) 2019-10-07
  17. NEP-MAC: Macroeconomics (1) 2016-07-02

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Annarosa Pesole should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.