IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/zbw/mpifgs/83.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Große Hoffnungen und brüchige Koalitionen: Industrie, Politik und die schwierige Durchsetzung der Photovoltaik

Author

Listed:
  • Ergen, Timur

Abstract

Die direkte Sonnenenergienutzung hat seit den 1970er-Jahren einen beachtlichen technischen Fortschritt und große Zukunftshoffnungen hervorgebracht. Doch trotz des hohen Mobilisierungspotenzials in Wissenschaft, Politik und Wirtschaft und der daraus resultierenden großzügigen Förderung blieb die Photovoltaik bis Mitte des letzten Jahrzehnts eine Zukunftstechnologie ohne Marktchancen. Timur Ergen zeigt, dass diese Entwicklung auf Probleme sektoraler Ordnung zurückzuführen ist: In Industrie und Politik kam es wiederkehrend zu Umsetzungsproblemen und Konflikten, die verhinderten, dass die Solartechnik effektiv weiterentwickelt und kontinuierlich unterstützt wurde.

Suggested Citation

  • Ergen, Timur, 2015. "Große Hoffnungen und brüchige Koalitionen: Industrie, Politik und die schwierige Durchsetzung der Photovoltaik," Schriften aus dem Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung Köln, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, volume 83, number 83.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:mpifgs:83
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/181237/1/1028658435.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. A. Michael Spence, 1979. "Investment Strategy and Growth in a New Market," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 10(1), pages 1-19, Spring.
    2. Weir, Margaret & Rongerude, Jane & Ansell, Christopher K., 2011. "Collaboration Is Not Enough: Virtuous Cycles of Reform in Transportation Policy," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt8nk5s4w3, University of California Transportation Center.
    3. Mizruchi, Mark S., 2013. "The Fracturing of the American Corporate Elite," Economics Books, Harvard University Press, number 9780674072992, Spring.
    4. Michael E. Porter & A. Michael Spence, 1982. "The Capacity Expansion Process in a Growing Oligopoly: The Case of Corn Wet Milling," NBER Chapters, in: The Economics of Information and Uncertainty, pages 259-316, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Hoppmann, Joern & Peters, Michael & Schneider, Malte & Hoffmann, Volker H., 2013. "The two faces of market support—How deployment policies affect technological exploration and exploitation in the solar photovoltaic industry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 989-1003.
    6. Weir, Margaret & Rongerude, Jane & Ansell, Christopher K., 2011. "Collaboration Is Not Enough: Virtuous Cycles of Reform in Transportation Policy," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt8tk7d8kr, University of California Transportation Center.
    7. Richard M. Locke & Kathleen Thelen, 1995. "Apples and Oranges Revisited: Contextualized Comparisons and the Study of Comparative Labor Politics," Politics & Society, , vol. 23(3), pages 337-367, September.
    8. Prasad, Monica & Munch, Steven, 2012. "State-level renewable electricity policies and reductions in carbon emissions," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 237-242.
    9. Laird, Frank N. & Stefes, Christoph, 2009. "The diverging paths of German and United States policies for renewable energy: Sources of difference," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(7), pages 2619-2629, July.
    10. Peter Swenson, 1997. "Arranged Alliance: Business Interests in the New Deal," Politics & Society, , vol. 25(1), pages 66-116, March.
    11. Stokes, Leah C., 2013. "The politics of renewable energy policies: The case of feed-in tariffs in Ontario, Canada," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 490-500.
    12. Sigrid Quack, 2010. "Transnational communities and governance," Post-Print hal-01891975, HAL.
    13. Morgan, Mary S., 1992. "Competing notions of "competition" in late-nineteenth century American economics," Economic History Working Papers 22463, London School of Economics and Political Science, Department of Economic History.
    14. Mautz, Rüdiger & Rosenbaum, Wolf, 2012. "Der deutsche Stromsektor im Spannungsfeld energiewirtschaftlicher Umbaumodelle," WSI-Mitteilungen, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 65(2), pages 85-93.
    15. Kenworthy, Lane, 1990. "Are Industrial Policy and Corporatism Compatible?," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(3), pages 233-265, July.
    16. Weir, Margaret & Rongerude, Jane & Ansell, Christopher K., 2011. "Collaboration Is Not Enough: Virtuous Cycles of Reform in Transportation Policy," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt8sh5v9jq, University of California Transportation Center.
    17. Whitford, Josh, 2005. "The New Old Economy: Networks, Institutions, and the Organizational Transformation of American Manufacturing," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199286010.
    18. Sigurt Vitols, 1997. "German Industrial Policy: An Overview," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 15-36.
    19. Soskice, David, 1996. "German technology policy, innovation, and national institutional frameworks," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Economic Change and Employment FS I 96-319, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    20. Andrew Schrank & Josh Whitford, 2009. "Industrial Policy in the United States: A Neo-Polanyian Interpretation," Politics & Society, , vol. 37(4), pages 521-553, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Leonard Goke & Jens Weibezahn & Christian von Hirschhausen, 2021. "A collective blueprint, not a crystal ball: How expectations and participation shape long-term energy scenarios," Papers 2112.04821, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2022.
    2. Ergen, Timur, 2017. "Coalitional cohesion in technology policy: The case of the early solar cell industry in the United States," MPIfG Discussion Paper 17/7, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    3. Ergen, Timur & Seeliger, Martin, 2018. "Unsichere Zukünfte und die Entstehung von Kooperation: Wie Erwartungen kollektives Handeln ermöglichen," MPIfG Discussion Paper 18/8, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    4. Beckert, Jens, 2017. "Die Historizität fiktionaler Erwartungen," MPIfG Discussion Paper 17/8, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    5. Braun, Benjamin & Deeg, Richard, 2019. "Strong firms, weak banks: The financial consequences of Germany's export-led growth model," MPIfG Discussion Paper 19/5, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    6. Rothstein, Sidney A., 2020. "Toward a discursive approach to growth models: Social blocs in the politics of digital transformation," MPIfG Discussion Paper 20/8, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    7. Beckert, Jens, 2024. "What makes an imagined future credible?," MPIfG Discussion Paper 24/5, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ergen, Timur, 2017. "Coalitional cohesion in technology policy: The case of the early solar cell industry in the United States," MPIfG Discussion Paper 17/7, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    2. Christoph H. Stefes, 2020. "Opposing Energy Transitions: Modeling the Contested Nature of Energy Transitions in the Electricity Sector," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 37(3), pages 292-312, May.
    3. Marco R. Di Tommaso & Stuart O. Schweitzer, 2013. "Industrial Policy in America," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 13749.
    4. Osmani, Atif & Zhang, Jun & Gonela, Vinay & Awudu, Iddrisu, 2013. "Electricity generation from renewables in the United States: Resource potential, current usage, technical status, challenges, strategies, policies, and future directions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 454-472.
    5. Glenn Morgan & Marco Hauptmeier, 2021. "The Social Organization of Ideas in Employment Relations," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 74(3), pages 773-797, May.
    6. Bahramian, Pejman & Jenkins, Glenn P. & Milne, Frank, 2021. "A stakeholder analysis of investments in wind power electricity generation in Ontario," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    7. Pérez de Arce, Miguel & Sauma, Enzo & Contreras, Javier, 2016. "Renewable energy policy performance in reducing CO2 emissions," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 272-280.
    8. Philipp Brandt & Andrew Schrank & Josh Whitford, 2018. "Brokerage and Boots on the Ground: Complements or Substitutes in the Manufacturing Extension Partnerships?," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 32(4), pages 288-299, November.
    9. Pejman Bahramian & Glenn Jenkins & Frank Milne, 2020. "A stakeholder analysis of investments for wind power electricity generation in Ontario," Working Paper 1442, Economics Department, Queen's University.
    10. Walker, Chad & Stephenson, Laura & Baxter, Jamie, 2018. "“His main platform is ‘stop the turbines’ ”: Political discourse, partisanship and local responses to wind energy in Canada," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 670-681.
    11. Johan S. G. Chu, 2018. "A Theory of Durable Dominance," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 3(3), pages 498-512, September.
    12. van Damme, Eric & Hurkens, Sjaak, 1999. "Endogenous Stackelberg Leadership," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 105-129, July.
    13. Christoph P. Kiefer & Pablo Del Río González & Javier Carrillo‐Hermosilla, 2019. "Drivers and barriers of eco‐innovation types for sustainable transitions: A quantitative perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 155-172, January.
    14. Xavier Martinez-Giralt & Barros Pedro Pita, 2005. "Bargaining and idle public sector capacity in health care," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 9(5), pages 1-8.
    15. Monika Janičíková, 2014. "Asymmetric information within Initial Public Offerings [Asymetrická informace při primárních emisích akcií]," Český finanční a účetní časopis, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2014(2), pages 81-91.
    16. Johannes Urpelainen, 2012. "How do electoral competition and special interests shape the stringency of renewable energy standards?," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 14(1), pages 23-34, January.
    17. Ammar Hussain & Minhas Akbar & Muhammad Kaleem Khan & Ahsan Akbar & Mirela Panait & Marian Catalin Voica, 2020. "When Does Earnings Management Matter? Evidence across the Corporate Life Cycle for Non-Financial Chinese Listed Companies," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-19, December.
    18. Orsatti, Gianluca & Pezzoni, Michele & Quatraro, Francesco, 2017. "Where Do Green Technologies Come From? Inventor Teams’ Recombinant Capabilities and the Creation of New Knowledge," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis. Working Papers 201711, University of Turin.
    19. Jens Arnholtz & Nana Wesley Hansen, 2013. "Labour market specific institutions and the working conditions of labour migrants: The case of Polish migrant labour in the Danish labour market," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 34(3), pages 401-422, August.
    20. Gürtler, Marc & Sieg, Gernot, 2006. "Crunch time: The optimal policy to avoid the "Announcement Effect" when terminating a subsidy," Working Papers FW24V2, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Institute of Finance.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:mpifgs:83. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mpigfde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.