IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/espost/312553.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Fulfillment Center Intervention Study: Protocol for a group-randomized control trial of a participatory workplace intervention

Author

Listed:
  • Kelly, Erin L.
  • Siebach, Kirsten F.
  • DeHorn, Grace
  • Lovejoy, Megan

Abstract

Warehousing and storage is an economically vital industry, with 1.2 million workers in 2020. The Fulfillment Center Intervention Study focuses on workers in fulfillment centers in the e-commerce segment of this industry. Fulfillment centers are a growing yet understudied work environment which provides a unique setting to further examine how working conditions and worker voice influence health. The Study involves a group-randomized controlled trial comparing participants in worksites randomized to launch the participatory intervention (Health and Well-Being Committees, or HaWCs) with participants working for the same firm in control sites. HaWCs serve as a new formal voice channel where a small group of frontline workers and supervisors solicit workers’ concerns and ideas about safety (e.g., physical hazards), the psychosocial environment (e.g., how workers feel about their treatment at work), and work organization (e.g., workflow, training opportunities, scheduling) and then develop and implement improvement projects in response. The primary objectives of the study are to evaluate the efficacy of the HaWC intervention and its effect on mental health outcomes and changes in the conditions of work within fulfillment centers, and to conduct a process evaluation of key contextual factors that support effective intervention implementation and sustained engagement. To our knowledge, this will be the first trial of a participatory intervention within a fulfillment center setting. Anticipated challenges include competing demands and company initiatives that may limit management support and high turnover. Should the intervention be shown to be feasible, the outcomes from this study will inform future randomized controlled trials of participatory interventions. Trial registration: This trial is registered with the ClinicalTrials.gov registry ( NCT05199415 ) and approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (Protocol: 200800024).

Suggested Citation

  • Kelly, Erin L. & Siebach, Kirsten F. & DeHorn, Grace & Lovejoy, Megan, 2024. "The Fulfillment Center Intervention Study: Protocol for a group-randomized control trial of a participatory workplace intervention," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 19(7), pages 1-18.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:312553
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305334
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/312553/1/Full-text-article-Kelly-et-al-The-fulfillment-center.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0305334?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Böckerman, Petri & Bryson, Alex & Ilmakunnas, Pekka, 2012. "Does high involvement management improve worker wellbeing?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 84(2), pages 660-680.
    2. Sojourner, Aaron & Yang, Jooyoung, 2015. "Effects of Unionization on Workplace-Safety Enforcement: Regression-Discontinuity Evidence," IZA Discussion Papers 9610, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Erin L Kelly & Kirsten F Siebach & Grace DeHorn & Megan Lovejoy, 2024. "The Fulfillment Center Intervention Study: Protocol for a group-randomized control trial of a participatory workplace intervention," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(7), pages 1-18, July.
    2. Surhan Cam & Serap Palaz, 2023. "Mutual interests management with a purposive approach: Evidence from the Turkish shipyards for an amorphous impact model between (subjective) well‐being and performance," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(1), pages 40-70, January.
    3. Alex Bryson & Lucy Stokes & David Wilkinson, 2023. "Is pupil attainment higher in well-managed schools?," Education Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 129-144, January.
    4. Laszlo Goerke, 2017. "Sick pay reforms and health status in a unionised labour market," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 64(2), pages 115-142, May.
    5. Sania Khan & Wadi B. Alonazi & Azam Malik & Noor Raihani Zainol, 2023. "Does Corporate Social Responsibility Moderate the Nexus of Organizational Culture and Job Satisfaction?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-17, May.
    6. Ling Li & Shawn Rohlin & Perry Singleton, 2022. "Labor Unions and Workplace Safety," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 75(2), pages 402-426, March.
    7. Laura Lacomba-Trejo & Joaquín Mateu-Mollá & Monica D. Bellegarde-Nunes & Iraida Delhom, 2022. "Are Coping Strategies, Emotional Abilities, and Resilience Predictors of Well-Being? Comparison of Linear and Non-Linear Methodologies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-13, June.
    8. Angela Sutan & Radu Vranceanu, 2019. "Managerial Behavior in the Lab: Information Disclosure, Decision Process and Leadership Style," Working Papers hal-02291210, HAL.
    9. Petri Böckerman & Alex Bryson & Antti Kauhanen & Mari Kangasniemi, 2020. "Does job design make workers happy?," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 67(1), pages 31-52, February.
    10. Joseph Blasi & Richard Freeman & Douglas Kruse, 2016. "Do Broad-based Employee Ownership, Profit Sharing and Stock Options Help the Best Firms Do Even Better?," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 54(1), pages 55-82, March.
    11. Benjamin Artz & Amanda H. Goodall & Andrew J. Oswald, 2020. "How Common Are Bad Bosses?," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(1), pages 3-39, January.
    12. Rita de Cássia Akutsu & Ada Rocha & Victor Viana & Luiz Akutsu & Izabel Cristina Silva & Raquel Braz Assunção Botelho & Heesup Han & António Raposo & Antonio Ariza-Montes & Luis Araya-Castillo & Renat, 2021. "Well-Being at Work: A Cross-Sectional Study on the Portuguese Nutritionists," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-13, July.
    13. Pierre Blavier & Jérôme Pélisse, 2022. "Négocier collectivement les salaires en entreprise : quels effets de la (non-)mobilisation des salarié·es ?," Post-Print hal-03887461, HAL.
    14. Petri Böckerman & Alex Bryson & Antti Kauhanen & Mari Kangasniemi, 2016. "Does Job Support Make Workers Happy?," DoQSS Working Papers 16-16, Quantitative Social Science - UCL Social Research Institute, University College London.
    15. Ludivine Martin, 2020. "How to retain motivated employees in their jobs?," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 41(4), pages 910-953, November.
    16. Böckerman, Petri & Bryson, Alex & Ilmakunnas, Ilari & Ilmakunnas, Pekka, 2025. "Does high involvement management make you work longer? Insights from linked survey and register data," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 30(C).
    17. White, Michael & Bryson, Alex, 2018. "HPWS in the Public Sector: Are There Mutual Gains?," IZA Discussion Papers 11965, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    18. Chitra Krishnan & Shailender Singh & Mubashir Majid Baba, 2024. "Effect of work from home and employee mental health through mediating role of workaholism and work-family balance," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 70(1), pages 144-156, February.
    19. Yoko Asuyama, 2022. "Doing boss‐like tasks and worker well‐being: Job enrichment revisited," LABOUR, CEIS, vol. 36(2), pages 196-230, June.
    20. Guangdong Wu & Zhibin Hu & Junwei Zheng, 2019. "Role Stress, Job Burnout, and Job Performance in Construction Project Managers: The Moderating Role of Career Calling," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-20, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:312553. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.