IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i12p7478-d842008.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are Coping Strategies, Emotional Abilities, and Resilience Predictors of Well-Being? Comparison of Linear and Non-Linear Methodologies

Author

Listed:
  • Laura Lacomba-Trejo

    (Departament of Personality, Evaluation and Psychological Treatment, Faculty of Psychology, University of Valencia, Av. Blasco Ibánez, 21, 46010 Valencia, Spain)

  • Joaquín Mateu-Mollá

    (Faculty of Health Sciences, Valencian International University, Street Pintor Sorolla, 21, 46002 Valencia, Spain)

  • Monica D. Bellegarde-Nunes

    (Fundación Pilares para la Autonomía Personal, Street de Ríos Rosas, 11, 28003 Madrid, Spain)

  • Iraida Delhom

    (Faculty of Health Sciences, Valencian International University, Street Pintor Sorolla, 21, 46002 Valencia, Spain
    Departament of Developmental, Educational and Social Psychology and Methodology, Universitat Jaume I Castellón, Av. Vicent Sos Baynat, s/n, 12071 Castellón de la Plana, Spain)

Abstract

Emotional intelligence (EI), problem-oriented coping, and resilience have been deeply studied as psychological predictors of wellbeing in stressful daily situations. The aim was to find out whether coping, EI, and resilience are predictors of well-being, using two statistical methodologies (hierarchical regression models and comparative qualitative models). With this objective in mind, we built an online evaluation protocol and administered it to 427 Spanish people, exploring these variables through a selection of validated tests. The extracted data were studied using linear predictive tests (hierarchical regression models), as well as fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis. We found that EI variables had important associations with coping, positive affect, negative affect, and life satisfaction, and also acted as relevant predictors for all of them, together with resilience and problem-oriented coping. The fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis showed a series of logical combinations of conditional causes and results of each potential configuration for these variables. The interaction between the presence of EI, resilience, and coping resulted in high levels of well-being. On the other hand, the presence of high emotional attention in interaction with low resilience and low coping abilities resulted in low well-being. These results increase knowledge about protective factors and allow for the creation of intervention programmes to enhance them.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura Lacomba-Trejo & Joaquín Mateu-Mollá & Monica D. Bellegarde-Nunes & Iraida Delhom, 2022. "Are Coping Strategies, Emotional Abilities, and Resilience Predictors of Well-Being? Comparison of Linear and Non-Linear Methodologies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-13, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:12:p:7478-:d:842008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/12/7478/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/12/7478/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Iraida Delhom & Margarita Gutierrez & Teresa Mayordomo & Juan Carlos Melendez, 2018. "Does Emotional Intelligence Predict Depressed Mood? A Structural Equation Model with Elderly People," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 19(6), pages 1713-1726, August.
    2. Feng Kong & Xinyu Gong & Sonia Sajjad & Kairong Yang & Jingjing Zhao, 2019. "How Is Emotional Intelligence Linked to Life Satisfaction? The Mediating Role of Social Support, Positive Affect and Negative Affect," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 20(8), pages 2733-2745, December.
    3. Böckerman, Petri & Bryson, Alex & Ilmakunnas, Pekka, 2012. "Does high involvement management improve worker wellbeing?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 84(2), pages 660-680.
    4. Rabea Fischer & Jakob Scheunemann & Steffen Moritz, 2021. "Coping Strategies and Subjective Well-being: Context Matters," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 22(8), pages 3413-3434, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Surhan Cam & Serap Palaz, 2023. "Mutual interests management with a purposive approach: Evidence from the Turkish shipyards for an amorphous impact model between (subjective) well‐being and performance," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(1), pages 40-70, January.
    2. Alex Bryson & Lucy Stokes & David Wilkinson, 2023. "Is pupil attainment higher in well-managed schools?," Education Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 129-144, January.
    3. Laszlo Goerke, 2017. "Sick pay reforms and health status in a unionised labour market," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 64(2), pages 115-142, May.
    4. Sumbol Fiaz & Muhammad Azeem Qureshi, 2021. "How perceived organizational politics cause work-to-family conflict? Scoping and systematic review of literature," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-18, December.
    5. Chuhua Zheng & Yanhong Wu, 2020. "The More Modest You are, the Happier You are: The Mediating Roles of Emotional Intelligence and Self-esteem," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 21(5), pages 1603-1615, June.
    6. Sania Khan & Wadi B. Alonazi & Azam Malik & Noor Raihani Zainol, 2023. "Does Corporate Social Responsibility Moderate the Nexus of Organizational Culture and Job Satisfaction?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-17, May.
    7. Yang Yang & Keqiao Liu & Siqi Li & Man Shu, 2020. "Social Media Activities, Emotion Regulation Strategies, and Their Interactions on People’s Mental Health in COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-16, December.
    8. Angela Sutan & Radu Vranceanu, 2019. "Managerial Behavior in the Lab: Information Disclosure, Decision Process and Leadership Style," Working Papers hal-02291210, HAL.
    9. Petri Böckerman & Alex Bryson & Antti Kauhanen & Mari Kangasniemi, 2020. "Does job design make workers happy?," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 67(1), pages 31-52, February.
    10. Joseph Blasi & Richard Freeman & Douglas Kruse, 2016. "Do Broad-based Employee Ownership, Profit Sharing and Stock Options Help the Best Firms Do Even Better?," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 54(1), pages 55-82, March.
    11. Benjamin Artz & Amanda H. Goodall & Andrew J. Oswald, 2020. "How Common Are Bad Bosses?," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(1), pages 3-39, January.
    12. Rita de Cássia Akutsu & Ada Rocha & Victor Viana & Luiz Akutsu & Izabel Cristina Silva & Raquel Braz Assunção Botelho & Heesup Han & António Raposo & Antonio Ariza-Montes & Luis Araya-Castillo & Renat, 2021. "Well-Being at Work: A Cross-Sectional Study on the Portuguese Nutritionists," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-13, July.
    13. Sunday Fakunmoju & Funmi Bammeke & Ntandoyenkosi Maphosa, 2021. "The Effects of Emotional Intelligence and Parenting Styles on Self-Esteem in a Sample of Respondents in Nigeria," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 17(1), pages 276-298, March.
    14. Petri Böckerman & Alex Bryson & Antti Kauhanen & Mari Kangasniemi, 2016. "Does Job Support Make Workers Happy?," DoQSS Working Papers 16-16, Quantitative Social Science - UCL Social Research Institute, University College London.
    15. Ludivine Martin, 2020. "How to retain motivated employees in their jobs?," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 41(4), pages 910-953, November.
    16. Böckerman, Petri & Bryson, Alex & Ilmakunnas, Ilari & Ilmakunnas, Pekka, 2025. "Does high involvement management make you work longer? Insights from linked survey and register data," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 30(C).
    17. White, Michael & Bryson, Alex, 2018. "HPWS in the Public Sector: Are There Mutual Gains?," IZA Discussion Papers 11965, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    18. Chitra Krishnan & Shailender Singh & Mubashir Majid Baba, 2024. "Effect of work from home and employee mental health through mediating role of workaholism and work-family balance," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 70(1), pages 144-156, February.
    19. Yoko Asuyama, 2022. "Doing boss‐like tasks and worker well‐being: Job enrichment revisited," LABOUR, CEIS, vol. 36(2), pages 196-230, June.
    20. Guangdong Wu & Zhibin Hu & Junwei Zheng, 2019. "Role Stress, Job Burnout, and Job Performance in Construction Project Managers: The Moderating Role of Career Calling," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-20, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:12:p:7478-:d:842008. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.