IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v34y2026is2p1458-1476.html

Dual Pathways to Regenerative Business: How Green Leadership and Climate Anxiety Drive Circular Economy Success

Author

Listed:
  • Jianmin Sun
  • Ahmad Zaeem Faraz
  • Muddassar Sarfraz
  • Shafaq Arshad

Abstract

The universal effect of climate change on humanity is agonizingly evident. The adverse outcomes of climate change have significantly influenced individuals' perception of resource regeneration, a crucial aspect of the circular economy model. While circular economy practices encourage eco‐friendly consumption and waste mitigation, resource regeneration extends beyond harmonizing and reconciling the world's ecosystem to restoring natural processes that have been harmed or depleted by humans. This study investigates how green transformational leadership, psychological safety, and climate change anxiety (CCA) shape circular economy (CE) implementation and resource regeneration in Chinese organizations. Using survey data from 350 managers in the manufacturing, logistics, and energy sectors, we tested a dual‐pathway model in which sustainability knowledge sharing and digital innovation function as mediators. The results reveal that green leadership and psychological safety significantly enhance both knowledge sharing and digital innovation. Notably, CCA exhibits an inverted U‐shaped relationship with these outcomes, suggesting that moderate anxiety optimizes engagement, while excessive anxiety impedes progress. Perceived environmental resource scarcity amplifies the positive effects of knowledge sharing and innovation on circular economy behaviors and resource regeneration. These findings offer guidance for organizations and policymakers to foster regenerative business models that are both psychologically and technologically resilient. Businesses must cultivate green transformational leadership through sustainability training and integrate circular economy principles into strategies to encourage innovation. Policymakers should facilitate this transition by creating supportive regulatory frameworks, providing grants, raising awareness, and promoting collaboration to progress toward a circular economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Jianmin Sun & Ahmad Zaeem Faraz & Muddassar Sarfraz & Shafaq Arshad, 2026. "Dual Pathways to Regenerative Business: How Green Leadership and Climate Anxiety Drive Circular Economy Success," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(S2), pages 1458-1476, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:34:y:2026:i:s2:p:1458-1476
    DOI: 10.1002/sd.70408
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70408
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sd.70408?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. ., 2024. "Climate change and energy transitions," Chapters, in: Unpacking the G20, chapter 5, pages 84-102, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Wenhao Song & Guo‐Zheng Wang & Xifang Ma, 2020. "Environmental innovation practices and green product innovation performance: A perspective from organizational climate," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(1), pages 224-234, January.
    3. Shaheera Banu Z & V. VIMALA, 2024. "Integration of ESG principles: An initiative for transformation from Linear Economy to Circular Economy," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(2(639), S), pages 183-196, Summer.
    4. Kevin Zheng Zhou & Fang Wu, 2010. "Technological capability, strategic flexibility, and product innovation," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 547-561, May.
    5. Moacir Filho Godinho & Jéssica dos Santos Leite Gonella & Hengky Latan & Gilberto Miller Devos Ganga, 2024. "Awareness as a Catalyst for Sustainable Behaviors: A Theoretical Exploration of Planned Behavior and Value-Belief-Norms in the Circular Economy," Post-Print hal-04888407, HAL.
    6. Berthold, Anne & Cologna, Viktoria & Siegrist, Michael, 2022. "The influence of scarcity perception on people's pro-environmental behavior and their readiness to accept new sustainable technologies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    7. Khaddage-Soboh, Nada & Yunis, Manal & Imran, Muhammad & Zeb, Faheem, 2024. "Sustainable practices in Malaysian manufacturing: The influence of CSR, transformational leadership, and green organizational culture on environmental performance," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 753-768.
    8. Ibrahim Adam & Abednego Osei & Rita Akua Aboagye, 2025. "Firms and the path to circular economy: unveiling the impact of ownership dynamics and innovation capacity through advanced econometric and quantile regression analysis," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 2483369-248, December.
    9. Bretschger, Lucas, 2024. "Energy transition and climate change abatement: A macroeconomic analysis," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    10. Alexander Yuriev & Olivier Boiral & David Talbot, 2022. "Is there a place for employee-driven pro-environmental innovations? The case of public organizations," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(9), pages 1383-1410, September.
    11. M. Waqas & A. Rashid Khan & A. Haseeb Tahir, 2024. "When And How Green Transformational Leadership Leads To Green Technology Innovation: The Mediation Effect Of Green Innovation Capability," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 28(03n04), pages 1-26, May.
    12. Belinda Wade & Cristyn Meath & Andrew Griffiths, 2022. "Capabilities for circularity: Overcoming challenges to turn waste into a resource," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(6), pages 2658-2681, September.
    13. Jéssica dos Santos Leite Gonella & Moacir Godinho Filho & Gilberto Miller Devós Ganga & Hengky Latan & Charbel Jose Chiappetta Jabbour, 2024. "A behavioral perspective on circular economy awareness: The moderating role of social influence and psychological barriers," Post-Print hal-04454781, HAL.
    14. Catriona Soutar & Anne P. F. Wand, 2022. "Understanding the Spectrum of Anxiety Responses to Climate Change: A Systematic Review of the Qualitative Literature," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-23, January.
    15. Afshan, Sahar & Ozturk, Ilhan & Yaqoob, Tanzeela, 2022. "Facilitating renewable energy transition, ecological innovations and stringent environmental policies to improve ecological sustainability: Evidence from MM-QR method," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 151-160.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Asep Marfu & Agung Purwanto & Nadiroh & Hafid Abbas & Bagus Sumargo & Septantri Shinta Wulandari & Daiman & Christin A. Malaihollo & Syakyakirti & David Tanubrata & Dewi Indah Pratiwi, 2025. "Psychological Factors Influencing Environmental Knowledge and their Impact on Indonesian Circular Economy Adoption," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 5(4), pages 3369-3399, August.
    2. Bogdzinski, Heidi & Sergio, Ivan & Wedemeier, Jan, 2025. "Unveiling the impact of green energy on green productivity: A focus on hydrogen and the green transition in European regions," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 1064-1082.
    3. Liu, Jiamin & Zhang, Jiaoning & Ma, Xiaoyu & Zhao, Bin & Zhang, Mengyu, 2024. "The road to sustainable development: Can the new energy demonstration city policy promote the industrial structure transformation?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(PB).
    4. Zahra Fozouni Ardekani & Seyed Mohammad Javad Sobhani & Marcelo Werneck Barbosa & Ehsan Amiri-Ardekani & Samaneh Dehghani & Najmeh Sasani & Hans De Steur, 2024. "Determinants of household food waste behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic in Iran: an integrated model," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(10), pages 26205-26235, October.
    5. Shashank Vaid & Michael Ahearne, 2021. "The instantaneous commitment effect: developing stakeholder orientation among managers," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(1), pages 162-179, June.
    6. Aamir Javed & Agnese Rapposelli & Feroz Khan & Asif Javed & Nabila Abid, 2024. "Do Green Technology Innovation, Environmental Policy, and the Transition to Renewable Energy Matter in Times of Ecological Crises? A Step towards Ecological Sustainability," Post-Print hal-04889069, HAL.
    7. Caroline Danièle Mothe & Thuc Uyen Nguyen-Thi, 2017. "Persistent openness and environmental innovation: An empirical analysis of French manufacturing firms," Post-Print hal-01609129, HAL.
    8. Yusuke Oh & Koji Takahashi, 2020. "R&D and Innovation: Evidence from Patent Data," Bank of Japan Working Paper Series 20-E-7, Bank of Japan.
    9. Musarra, Giuseppe & Kadile, Vita & Zaefarian, Ghasem & Oghazi, Pejvak & Najafi-Tavani, Zhaleh, 2022. "Emotions, culture intelligence, and mutual trust in technology business relationships," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    10. Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés & Zhang, Min, 2020. "The cost of weak institutions for innovation in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    11. Farzana Riva & Solon Magrizos & Mohammad Rabiul Basher Rubel, 2021. "Investigating the link between managers' green knowledge and leadership style, and their firms' environmental performance: The mediation role of green creativity," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 3228-3240, November.
    12. Huigang Liang & Nianxin Wang & Yajiong Xue & Shilun Ge, 2017. "Unraveling the Alignment Paradox: How Does Business—IT Alignment Shape Organizational Agility?," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(4), pages 863-879, December.
    13. Radovan Savov & Drahoslav Lančarič & Jana Kozáková, 2020. "Size of the Company as the Main Determinant of Talent Management in Slovakia," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-14, March.
    14. Sheng, Margaret L. & Chien, Iting, 2016. "Rethinking organizational learning orientation on radical and incremental innovation in high-tech firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(6), pages 2302-2308.
    15. Wei Sun & Ang Xu & Yufan Shang, 2014. "Transformational leadership, team climate, and team performance within the NPD team: Evidence from China," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 127-147, March.
    16. Liwen Wang & Jin Jason Lu & Kevin Zhou, 2023. "Technological Capability Strength/Asymmetry and Supply Chain Process Innovation: The Contingent Roles of Institutional Environments in China," Post-Print hal-03954124, HAL.
    17. Mariana G. Andrade-Rojas & Terence J. V. Saldanha & Abhishek Kathuria & Jiban Khuntia & Waifong Boh, 2024. "How Information Technology Overcomes Deficiencies for Innovation in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: Closed Innovation vs. Open Innovation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(4), pages 1981-2012, December.
    18. Jin Li & Lulu Zhou & Xufan Zhang & Zhihong Chen & Feng Tian, 2018. "Technological Configuration Capability, Strategic Flexibility, and Organizational Performance in Chinese High-Tech Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-17, May.
    19. Marek Walacik & Aneta Chmielewska, 2024. "Energy Performance in Residential Buildings as a Property Market Efficiency Driver," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-18, May.
    20. Jörg Claussen & Christian Essling & Christian Peukert, 2018. "Demand variation, strategic flexibility and market entry: Evidence from the U.S. airline industry," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(11), pages 2877-2898, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:34:y:2026:i:s2:p:1458-1476. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.