IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v33y2025i3p4009-4038.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Do Path Dependencies in Family Farming Affect Behavioural Intentions to Adopt Sustainable Practices? Exploring the Potential of Developing Carbon Farming by Smallholders in Serbia

Author

Listed:
  • Michał Borychowski
  • Bazyli Czyżewski
  • Agnieszka Sapa
  • Łukasz Kryszak

Abstract

Carbon farming (CF) is an approach to agricultural production that aims to increase soil organic carbon. The main objective of this article was to investigate the intentions of Serbian farmers to implement CF practices based on an extended model of the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB). The research sample consisted of cereal farmers from northern Serbia. The analysis was conducted using structural equation modelling and simultaneous confirmatory factor analysis. The novelty of the study lies in revealing the role of embeddedness in a family farm context, reinforced by specific morality, both of which play a significant role in shaping farmers' intentions. However, the effect of such path dependencies was ambiguous. Path dependencies had a positive effect on subjective norms, which in turn had an indirect positive effect on intentions. However, in relation to perceived behavioural control, path dependencies had a negative effect on intentions to adopt CF. The paradox that the more experienced and confident farmers were less likely to adopt sustainable practices was explained by an overconfidence bias, which is a useful observation for policy makers in terms of developing extension services. A second important finding is the confirmation of the key role of morality and the identification of motives related to land succession, which will be also useful for agricultural policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Michał Borychowski & Bazyli Czyżewski & Agnieszka Sapa & Łukasz Kryszak, 2025. "How Do Path Dependencies in Family Farming Affect Behavioural Intentions to Adopt Sustainable Practices? Exploring the Potential of Developing Carbon Farming by Smallholders in Serbia," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(3), pages 4009-4038, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:33:y:2025:i:3:p:4009-4038
    DOI: 10.1002/sd.3321
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3321
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sd.3321?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dunkel, Curtis S. & Nedelec, Joseph & van der Linden, Dimitri, 2023. "Reevaluating the Dunning-Kruger effect: A response to and replication of Gignac and Zajenkowski (2020)," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    2. Biel, Anders & Thogersen, John, 2007. "Activation of social norms in social dilemmas: A review of the evidence and reflections on the implications for environmental behaviour," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 93-112, January.
    3. Maryna Brychko & Yuriy Bilan & Serhiy Lyeonov & Dalia Streimikiene, 2023. "Do changes in the business environment and sustainable development really matter for enhancing enterprise development?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 587-599, April.
    4. Aparna Venugopal & Dhirendra Shukla, 2019. "Between hesitation and decisiveness—Understanding consumers' ego, altruism, and eagerness to pay for renewable energy," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(5), pages 932-944, September.
    5. Kragt, M.E. & Gibson, F.L. & Maseyk, F. & Wilson, K.A., 2016. "Public willingness to pay for carbon farming and its co-benefits," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 125-131.
    6. Lee, Guenwoo & Suzuki, Aya & Nam, Vu Hoang, 2019. "Effect of network-based targeting on the diffusion of good aquaculture practices among shrimp producers in Vietnam," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 1-1.
    7. L. Asprooth & M. Norton & R. Galt, 2023. "The adoption of conservation practices in the Corn Belt: the role of one formal farmer network, Practical Farmers of Iowa," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 40(4), pages 1559-1580, December.
    8. Gignac, Gilles E. & Zajenkowski, Marcin, 2020. "The Dunning-Kruger effect is (mostly) a statistical artefact: Valid approaches to testing the hypothesis with individual differences data," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    9. Marco Pittarello & Francesca Chiarini & Cristina Menta & Lorenzo Furlan & Paolo Carletti, 2022. "Changes in Soil Quality through Conservation Agriculture in North-Eastern Italy," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-12, July.
    10. Evagelos D. Lioutas & Chrysanthi Charatsari, 2018. "Green Innovativeness in Farm Enterprises: What Makes Farmers Think Green?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(4), pages 337-349, July.
    11. Maria Ijaz Baig & Elaheh Yadegaridehkordi, 2024. "Exploring moderating role of blockchain adoption on economic and environmental sustainability of organizations: A SEM‐fsQCA technique," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(4), pages 3824-3839, August.
    12. Bogdan Dima & Ştefana Maria Dima & Adriana Tiron Tudor, 2024. "Societal sustainable development and long‐run economic growth: How do we stand?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(4), pages 4222-4249, August.
    13. Mucan, Petar & Bozic, Dragica & Bogdanov, Natalija, 2010. "Economic Efficiency Of Field Crop Production On Family Farms In The Autonomous Province Of Vojvodina," Economics of Agriculture, Institute of Agricultural Economics, vol. 57(01).
    14. Laurence G. Smith & Guy J. D. Kirk & Philip J. Jones & Adrian G. Williams, 2019. "The greenhouse gas impacts of converting food production in England and Wales to organic methods," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.
    15. Baumber, Alex & Metternicht, Graciela & Cross, Rebecca & Ruoso, Laure-Elise & Cowie, Annette L. & Waters, Cathleen, 2019. "Promoting co-benefits of carbon farming in Oceania: Applying and adapting approaches and metrics from existing market-based schemes," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    16. Asif Muzaffar & Aitzaz Khurshid & Muhammad Nasir Malik & Aisha Azhar, 2019. "Sustainable development across the supply chain: The missing link of socio‐environmental effect," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(5), pages 976-981, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gignac, Gilles E., 2024. "Rethinking the Dunning-Kruger effect: Negligible influence on a limited segment of the population," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    2. Maria Andersson & Ola Eriksson & Chris Von Borgstede, 2012. "The Effects of Environmental Management Systems on Source Separation in the Work and Home Settings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(6), pages 1-17, June.
    3. Marie-Laure Cabon-Dhersin & Nathalie Etchart-Vincent, 2013. "Wording and gender effects in a Game of Chicken. An explorative experimental study," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-00796708, HAL.
    4. Corey Angst, 2009. "Protect My Privacy or Support the Common-Good? Ethical Questions About Electronic Health Information Exchanges," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 90(2), pages 169-178, November.
    5. Pieper, Nadine & Woisetschläger, David M., 2024. "Customer misbehavior in access-based mobility services: An examination of prevention strategies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    6. Meike Weltin & Silke Hüttel, 2023. "Sustainable Intensification Farming as an Enabler for Farm Eco-Efficiency?," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 84(1), pages 315-342, January.
    7. Lars E. Olsson & Jana Huck & Margareta Friman, 2018. "Intention for Car Use Reduction: Applying a Stage-Based Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-14, January.
    8. Caserta, Maurizio & Distefano, Rosaria & Ferrante, Livio, 2022. "The Good of Rules: An experimental study on prosocial behavior," EconStor Preprints 266393, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    9. Wei Fang & Lulu Tang & Pengxiao Cheng & Naveed Ahmad, 2018. "Evolution Decision, Drivers and Green Innovation Performance for Collaborative Innovation Center of Ecological Building Materials and Environmental Protection Equipment in Jiangsu Province of China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-19, October.
    10. Ross Kingwell, 2021. "Making Agriculture Carbon Neutral Amid a Changing Climate: The Case of South-Western Australia," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-20, November.
    11. Ethan Gordon & Federico Davila & Chris Riedy, 2022. "Transforming landscapes and mindscapes through regenerative agriculture," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(2), pages 809-826, June.
    12. de la Cruz, Vera Ysabel V. & Tantriani, & Cheng, Weiguo & Tawaraya, Keitaro, 2023. "Yield gap between organic and conventional farming systems across climate types and sub-types: A meta-analysis," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    13. Matthew Chao & Geoffrey Fisher, 2022. "Self-Interested Giving: The Relationship Between Conditional Gifts, Charitable Donations, and Donor Self-Interestedness," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(6), pages 4537-4567, June.
    14. Bamberg, Sebastian & Fujii, Satoshi & Friman, Margareta & Gärling, Tommy, 2011. "Behaviour theory and soft transport policy measures," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 228-235, January.
    15. repec:cup:judgdm:v:16:y:2021:i:5:p:1267-1289 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Abbie A. Rogers & Fiona L. Dempster & Jacob I. Hawkins & Robert J. Johnston & Peter C. Boxall & John Rolfe & Marit E. Kragt & Michael P. Burton & David J. Pannell, 2019. "Valuing non-market economic impacts from natural hazards," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 99(2), pages 1131-1161, November.
    17. Adamecz, Anna & Ilieva, Radina & Shure, Nikki, 2025. "Revisiting the Dunning-Kruger effect: Composite measures and heterogeneity by gender," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    18. Hans-Rüdiger Pfister & Gisela Böhm, 2012. "Responder Feelings in a Three-Player Three-Option Ultimatum Game: Affective Determinants of Rejection Behavior," Games, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-29, February.
    19. Debuschewitz, Emil & Sanders, Jürn, 2021. "Bewertung der Umweltwirkungen des ökologischen Landbaus im Kontext der kontroversen wissenschaftlichen Diskurse," 61st Annual Conference, Berlin, Germany, September 22-24, 2021 317076, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    20. Pongsapak Chindasombatcharoen & Pattanaporn Chatjuthamard & Pornsit Jiraporn & Sirimon Treepongkaruna, 2022. "Achieving sustainable development goals through board size and innovation," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(4), pages 664-677, August.
    21. Jingjing Wang & Mingyue Li & Sinan Li & Kai Chen, 2022. "Understanding Consumers’ Food Waste Reduction Behavior—A Study Based on Extended Norm Activation Theory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-15, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:33:y:2025:i:3:p:4009-4038. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.