IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/uwp/jhriss/v58y2023i3p1028-1055.html

Socialized Healthcare and Women’s Fertility Decisions

Author

Listed:
  • Resul Cesur
  • Pinar Mine Gunes
  • Erdal Tekin
  • Aydogan Ulker

Abstract

We examine the effect of a nationwide healthcare reform implemented in Turkey on women’s fertility decisions. Established in 2005, the Family Medicine Program (FMP) provides a wide range of free-of-charge healthcare services to all Turkish citizens through neighborhood clinics. Results indicate that the FMP significantly reduced childbearing among females at various age categories, especially teenagers and those aged 25–29. Among teenagers, the FMP had an immediate impact on childbearing that is increasing over time, suggesting that the reproductive-heath and family-planning services had a direct negative influence on unplanned pregnancies. Among nonteenage women, however, the program had a gradual and slowly increasing impact over time, consistent with the notion that the FMP might have led to greater female empowerment. The results from an auxiliary analysis suggest that the FMP might have played a significant role in promoting gender equality and female empowerment, a finding consistent with reduced fertility.

Suggested Citation

  • Resul Cesur & Pinar Mine Gunes & Erdal Tekin & Aydogan Ulker, 2023. "Socialized Healthcare and Women’s Fertility Decisions," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 58(3), pages 1028-1055.
    • Handle: RePEc:uwp:jhriss:v:58:y:2023:i:3:p:1028-1055
    Note: DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.59.1.0419-10155R3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://jhr.uwpress.org/cgi/reprint/58/3/1028
    Download Restriction: A subscription is required to access pdf files. Pay per article is available.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or

    for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mutran, Victoria M. & Ribeiro, Celma O. & Nascimento, Claudio A.O. & Chachuat, Benoît, 2020. "Risk-conscious optimization model to support bioenergy investments in the Brazilian sugarcane industry," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    2. O'Donnell, Owen, 2024. "Health and health system effects on poverty: A narrative review of global evidence," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    3. Heather Griffiths, 2021. "Invisible people: A story of fertility treatment and loss during the pandemic," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(S2), pages 397-404, July.
    4. Paarlberg, Robert, 2022. "The trans-Atlantic conflict over “green” farming," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    5. Choi, Tsan-Ming & Guo, Shu & Luo, Suyuan, 2020. "When blockchain meets social-media: Will the result benefit social media analytics for supply chain operations management?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    6. Boxell, Levi & Steinert-Threlkeld, Zachary, 2022. "Taxing dissent: The impact of a social media tax in Uganda," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • I11 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Analysis of Health Care Markets
    • I13 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health Insurance, Public and Private
    • I14 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health and Inequality
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
    • J13 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Fertility; Family Planning; Child Care; Children; Youth

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uwp:jhriss:v:58:y:2023:i:3:p:1028-1055. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://jhr.uwpress.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.