IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/28147.html

Reconciling the Conflicting Narratives on Poverty in China

Author

Listed:
  • Shaohua Chen
  • Martin Ravallion

Abstract

The widely held view that China has greatly reduced income poverty over the last 40 years does not accord with all the evidence. The paper tries to reconcile the conflicting findings. The fact that strongly-relative measures show rising poverty is easily understood, since such measures depend solely on relative distribution, and inequality in China has been rising until recently. More surprising, and revealing, is the story told by the official lines, which were revised twice since the original 1985 line. The paper shows that the official lines are neither absolute nor strongly relative. Rather, they are weakly relative, with a positive elasticity to the mean that is less than unity. Along with rising inequality, this feature slowed the pace of measured poverty reduction when compared to absolute measures. Nonetheless, substantial progress against poverty is indicated, as we confirm using our independent, and higher, weakly-relative lines calibrated to cross-country data.

Suggested Citation

  • Shaohua Chen & Martin Ravallion, 2020. "Reconciling the Conflicting Narratives on Poverty in China," NBER Working Papers 28147, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  • Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:28147
    Note: DEV
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w28147.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ravallion, Martin & Chen, Shaohua, 2022. "Fleshing out the olive? Observations on income polarization in China since 1981," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    2. Bo Zhao & Phaik Kin Cheah & Priscilla Moses, 2024. "Measurement and determinants of multidimensional urban poverty: Evidence from Shandong Province, China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(5), pages 1-32, May.
    3. Zhou, Di & Zha, Fangjing & Qiu, Wenyan & Zhang, Xiaoru, 2024. "Does digital literacy reduce the risk of returning to poverty? Evidence from China," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(6).
    4. Zengzeng Fan & Wei Zou, 2023. "A Three-Component Decomposition of the Change in Relative Poverty: An Application to China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, January.
    5. Lugo,Maria Ana & Niu,Chiyu & Yemtsov,Ruslan G., 2021. "Rural Poverty Reduction and Economic Transformation in China : A Decomposition Approach," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9849, The World Bank.
    6. Shuang Xu & Kai Chen & Jiang Li, 2025. "Decomposing Poverty Change: A New Four-Dimensional Decomposition Method," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 178(1), pages 137-162, May.
    7. Suhaida Abu Bakar & Norhidayah Ali & Daing Maruak Sadek, 2025. "From Charity to Sustainable Development: A Review of Zakat Institutions in Poverty Alleviation," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(9), pages 1168-1181, September.
    8. Han, Linsong & Li, Xun & Xu, Gang, 2022. "Anti-corruption and poverty alleviation: Evidence from China," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 150-172.
    9. Martin Ravallion & Shaohua Chen, 2022. "Is that really a Kuznets curve? Turning points for income inequality in China," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 20(4), pages 749-776, December.
    10. Yingfeng Fang & Fen Zhang, 2021. "The Future Path To China’s Poverty Reduction—Dynamic Decomposition Analysis With The Evolution Of China’s Poverty Reduction Policies," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 158(2), pages 507-538, December.
    11. Shubin Wang & Qiang Li & Yan Gu, 2023. "Local officials' political capital and poverty alleviation," International Studies of Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(3), pages 351-369, September.
    12. Gustafsson, Björn Anders & Sai, Ding, 2023. "China's Urban Poor – Comparing Twice Poverty between Residents and Migrants in 2013 and 2018," IZA Discussion Papers 16255, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    13. Decerf,Benoit Marie A & Genoni,Maria Eugenia & Helmy,Imane Abdelfattah Ahmed Refaat & Sanz,Guillermo Federico, 2023. "Implications of Using Nonstandard Poverty Lines : An Illustration Using the Case of the ArabRepublic of Egypt," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10437, The World Bank.
    14. Hong Sun & Xiaohong Li & Wenjing Li & Jun Feng, 2022. "Differences and Influencing Factors of Relative Poverty of Urban and Rural Residents in China Based on the Survey of 31 Provinces and Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-15, July.
    15. Hua, Wenyuan, 2025. "On the distributional effects of principal-agent problems: Evidence from China’s shell farmer cooperatives," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    16. Gong, Jinquan & Wang, Gewei & Wang, Yafeng & Zhao, Yaohui, 2022. "Consumption and poverty of older Chinese: 2011–2020," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 23(C).
    17. Yang, Yaofeng & Jiang, Mingchun & Li, Xiuqing & Chen, Yajuan, 2024. "Energy poverty and household development resilience: Household level evidence from China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    18. Li, Bo & Lu, Shilin, 2023. "Labor education, cash transfers and student development: Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    19. Andrea Brandolini & John Micklewright, 2023. "Measuring global poverty," Chapters, in: Jacques Silber (ed.), Research Handbook on Measuring Poverty and Deprivation, chapter 6, pages 60-69, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    20. Dean, James & Geloso, Vincent, 2024. "Poverty spells and economic freedom: Canadian evidence," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 224(C), pages 282-296.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • I32 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - Measurement and Analysis of Poverty
    • O15 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Economic Development: Human Resources; Human Development; Income Distribution; Migration
    • O18 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Urban, Rural, Regional, and Transportation Analysis; Housing; Infrastructure

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:28147. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nberrus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.