IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Evaluating the impact of the structural funds on objective 1 regions: An exploratory discussion

Listed author(s):
  • Ron Martin
  • Peter Tyler

Martin R. and Tyler P. (2006) Evaluating the impact of the Structural Funds on Objective 1 regions: an exploratory discussion, Regional Studies 40, 201-210. Evaluation evidence on the impact of the Structural Funds on employment in Objective 1 regions remains elusive. This paper seeks to make a contribution to this task by evaluating the impact of European Union regional policy on cumulative job creation in the least prosperous Objective 1 regions (at the NUTS 2 level). It adopts an evaluation methodology pioneered originally by Moore and Rhodes in 1973 in the UK. While tentative, it estimates that the cumulative effect of European Union Cohesion policy is around 1 million jobs as at 2002, which is a significant contribution. Despite the considerable methodological and measurement problems, this paper aims to encourage further research to be undertaken in this important area. Objective 1 regions Impact Employment Counterfactual determination Martin R. et Tyler P. (2006) Evaluer l'impact des Fonds structurels sur les regions de l'Objectif 1: une discussion d'exploration, Regional Studies 40, 201-210. La documentation qui fait preuve de l'evaluation de l'impact des Fonds structurels sur l'emploi dans les regions de l'Objectif 1 reste insuffisante. Par la suite, cet article cherche a evaluer l'impact de la politique regionale de l'Union europeenne sur la creation d'emploi cumulee dans les regions les plus defavorisees de l'Objectif 1 (au niveau NUTS 2). On adopte une methodolgie d'evaluation mise au point point initialement par Moore et Rhodes en 1973 au Royaume-Uni. En bien que la methodologie soit experimentale, elle estime que l'effet cumule de la politique de l'UE en faveur de la cohesion se chiffre a environ un million d'emplois en 2002, ce qui est non-negligeable. Malgre les problemes de methodolgie et de mesure considerables, cet article cherche a encourager de plus amples recherches dans ce domaine important. Regions de l'Objectif 1 Impact Emploi Determination contrefactuelle Martin R. und Tyler P. (2006) Evaluierung der Auswirkung der Strukturfonds auf Ziel 1-Regionen: eine untersuchende Erorterung, Regional Studies 40, 201-210. Evaluierungsbeweise fur die Auswirkung des Strukturfonds auf Erwerbstatigkeit in Ziel 1-Regionen bleiben nach wie vor schwer erfassbar. Dieser Aufsatz sucht einen Beitrag zu diesem Gegenstand zu leisten, indem er die Auswirkung der Regionalpolitik der Europaischen Union auf die Gesamtserwerbsstellenschaffung in den am meisten benachteiligten Ziel 1-Regionen (auf NUTS 2 Ebene) bewertet. Er ubernimmt eine Evaluierungsmethodik, die in Grossbritannien ursprunglich von Moore und Rhodes (1973) eingefuhrt worden war. Obwohl vorlaufig, berichtet er, dass die Gesamtwirkung der Kohasionspolitik der EU sich im Jahre 2002 auf rund eine Million Erwerbsstellen belief, was einen signifikanten Beitrag bedeutet. Trotz betrachtlicher Probleme mit Methodik und Messungen setzt der Aufsatz sich zum Ziel, die Ausfuhrung weiterer Forschung auf diesem wichtigen Gebiet zu ermutigen. Ziel 1-Regionen Auswirkung Erwerbstatigkeit Kontrafaktische Bestimmung Martin R. y Tyler P. (2006) La evaluacion del impacto de los Fondos Estructurales sobre las regiones del Objetivo 1: Un estudio exploratorio, Regional Studies 40, 201-210. Todavia existen pocos trabajos de evaluacion que demuestren el impacto de los Fondos Estructurales para la creacion de empleo en las regiones del Objetivo 1. Con este articulo pretendemos contribuir a este objetivo evaluando que impacto ha tenido la politica regional de la Union Europea en la creacion acumulativa de trabajo en las regiones menos prosperas del Objetivo 1 (en el nivel NUTS 2). Se adopta una metodologia de evaluacion que fue elaborada y utilizada por primera vez por Moore y Rhodes (1973) en el Reino Unido. Aunque los datos son aproximados, se calcula que el efecto acumulativo de la politica de cohesion de la UE gira en torno a un millon de puestos de trabajo en 2002, lo que representa una importante contribucion. Pese a los grandes problemas de metodologia y medicion, creemos que es necesario fomentar mas investigaciones en este importante campo. Regiones del Objetivo 1 Impacto Empleo Determinacion contrafactual

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Article provided by Taylor & Francis Journals in its journal Regional Studies.

Volume (Year): 40 (2006)
Issue (Month): 2 ()
Pages: 201-210

in new window

Handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:40:y:2006:i:2:p:201-210
DOI: 10.1080/00343400600600546
Contact details of provider: Web page:

Order Information: Web:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:40:y:2006:i:2:p:201-210. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Michael McNulty)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.