IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/regstd/v43y2009i1p111-133.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Undermining the Principle of Concentration? European Union Regional Policy and the Socio-economic Disadvantage of European Regions

Author

Listed:
  • Riccardo regstdcenzi

Abstract

regstdcenzi R. Undermining the principle of concentration? European Union regional policy and the socio-economic disadvantage of European regions, Regional Studies. This paper sets out to analyse the regional policy of the European Union by assessing whether the actual distribution of funds to the regions undermines the principle of territorial concentration. The empirical analysis shows that, due to either political equilibriums or inaccurate assumptions about the most cost-effective allocation of the funds, the sources of structural disadvantage are more spatially concentrated than the funds devoted to compensating this disadvantage and reveals a weak association between socio-economic disadvantage and European Union funding. Corrections in allocation mechanisms are recommended in order to increase fund concentration and earmark resources more adequately to disadvantaged regions. [image omitted] regstdcenzi R. Saper le principe de la concentration? la politique regionale de l'Union Europeenne et le desavantage socio-economique des regions europeennes, Regional Studies. L'auteur analyse la politique regionale de l'Union Europeenne en cherchant a savoir si la repartition actuelle des credits pour les regions sape le principe de la concentration territoriale. L'analyse empirique montre que du fait des equilibres politiques ou d'hypotheses inexactes concernant l'affectation la plus rentable des fonds, les sources de desavantage structurel sont plus concentrees, dans l'espace, que les fonds consaregstd a compenser ce desavantage; elle revele egalement une association faible entre le desavantage socio-economique et le financement de l'UE. L'auteur recommande de corriger les mecanismes d'affectation afin d'augmenter la concentration des financements et de mieux reserver les ressources pour les regions desavantagees. Politique regionale Developpement regional Facteurs socio-economiques Union Europeenne Regions Croissance economique regstdcenzi R. Ein Verstoss gegen das Prinzip der Konzentration? Die Regionalpolitik der EU und der soziookonomische Nachteil europaischer Regionen, Regional Studies. In diesem Beitrag wird die Regionalpolitik der Europaischen Union im Hinblick auf die Frage bewertet, ob die tatsachliche Verteilung von Finanzmitteln unter den Regionen gegen das Prinzip der territorialen Konzentration verstosst. Aus der empirischen Analyse geht hervor, dass aufgrund von politischen Gleichgewichten oder unzutreffenden Annahmen uber die kosteneffektivste Zuteilung von Mitteln die Quellen struktureller Nachteile raumlich starker konzentriert sind als die zum Ausgleich dieses Nachteils aufgewendeten Mittel; ebenso zeigt sich eine schwache Verknupfung zwischen soziookonomischen Nachteilen und einer EU-Finanzierung. Es werden Korrekturen an den Zuweisungsmechanismen empfohlen, um die Konzentration der Finanzmittel zu erhohen und Ressourcen fur benachteiligte Regionen adaquater zuzuweisen. Regionalpolitik Regionalentwicklung Soziookonomische Faktoren Europaische Union Regionen Wirtschaftswachstum regstdcenzi R. ¿Socavando el principio de concentracion? Politica regional de la UE y la desventaja socioeconomica de las regiones europeas, Regional Studies. En este articulo analizo la politica regional de la Union Europea evaluando si la distribucion actual de los fondos para las regiones socava el principio de la concentracion territorial. Los analisis empiricos demuestran que, debido a equilibrios politicos o suposiciones inadecuadas sobre la asignacion de fondos mas rentables, las fuentes de desventajas estructurales estan mas concentradas espacialmente que los fondos destinados a compensar esta desventaja e indica una endeble asociacion entre la desventaja socioeconomica y la financiacion de la UE. Se recomiendan correcciones en los mecanismos de asignacion para aumentar la concentracion de fondos y mas adecuadamente para asignar recursos a regiones desfavorecidas. Politica regional Desarrollo regional Factores socioeconomicos Union Europea Regiones Crecimiento economico

Suggested Citation

  • Riccardo regstdcenzi, 2009. "Undermining the Principle of Concentration? European Union Regional Policy and the Socio-economic Disadvantage of European Regions," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(1), pages 111-133.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:43:y:2009:i:1:p:111-133
    DOI: 10.1080/00343400801932276
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00343400801932276
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00343400801932276?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giovanni Federico, 2005. "Introduction to Feeding the World: An Economic History of World Agriculture, 1800-2000," Introductory Chapters, in: Feeding the World: An Economic History of World Agriculture, 1800-2000, Princeton University Press.
    2. Philippe Martin, 1998. "Can Regional Policies Affect Growth and Geography in Europe?," Post-Print hal-03416388, HAL.
    3. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/9343 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Diego Puga, 2002. "European regional policies in light of recent location theories," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 2(4), pages 373-406, October.
    5. Philippe Martin, 1999. "Are European regional policies delivering?," Post-Print hal-01011168, HAL.
    6. Lichtenberg, Frank R, 1994. "Testing the Convergence Hypothesis," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 76(3), pages 576-579, August.
    7. Philippe Martin, 1998. "Can Regional Policies Affect Growth and Geography in Europe?," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(6), pages 757-774, August.
    8. Heckman, James, 2013. "Sample selection bias as a specification error," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 31(3), pages 129-137.
    9. Harvey Armstrong & Peter Wells, 2006. "Structural funds and the evaluation of community economic development initiatives in the UK: A critical perspective," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(2), pages 259-272.
    10. Cheshire, Paul C. & Magrini, Stefano, 2002. "The distinctive determinants of European urban growth: Does one size fit all?," ERSA conference papers ersa02p100, European Regional Science Association.
    11. Ron Martin & Peter Tyler, 2006. "Evaluating the impact of the structural funds on objective 1 regions: An exploratory discussion," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(2), pages 201-210.
    12. Magrini, Stefano, 1999. "The evolution of income disparities among the regions of the European Union," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 257-281, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Riccardo Crescenzi & Fabrizio De Filippis & Fabio Pierangeli, 2011. "Synergies and conflicts between EU policies and the objective of territorial cohesion," Departmental Working Papers of Economics - University 'Roma Tre' 0132, Department of Economics - University Roma Tre.
    2. Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés & Fratesi, Ugo, 2002. "Unbalanced development strategies and the lack of regional convergence in the EU," ERSA conference papers ersa02p415, European Regional Science Association.
    3. Riccardo Crescenzi & Fabrizio De Filippis & Fabio Pierangeli, 2015. "In Tandem for Cohesion? Synergies and Conflicts between Regional and Agricultural Policies of the European Union," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(4), pages 681-704, April.
    4. Andres RodrIguez-Pose & Ugo Fratesi†, 2004. "Between Development and Social Policies: The Impact of European Structural Funds in Objective 1 Regions," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(1), pages 97-113.
    5. Riccardo Crescenzi, 2006. "EU Development Policies and the Socio-Economic Disadvantage of European Regions," ERSA conference papers ersa06p552, European Regional Science Association.
    6. Riccardo Crescenzi, 2007. "Undermining the Principle of Concentration? Eu development policies and the Socio-Economic Disadvantage Of European Regions," Departmental Working Papers of Economics - University 'Roma Tre' 0073, Department of Economics - University Roma Tre.
    7. Peter Wostner, 2003. "Regional Disparities in Transition Economies: the case of Slovenia," SCIENZE REGIONALI, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2003(1).
    8. Stavros Rodokanakis, 2006. "“How Effective are the Regional Policies of Convergence in the EU?”," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3-4), pages 59-74.
    9. Zsuzsanna Tron, 2009. "Examining the impact of European regional policy," IWE Working Papers 188, Institute for World Economics - Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.
    10. Ulltveit-Moe, Karen Helene, 2007. "Regional policy design: An analysis of relocation, efficiency and equity," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 51(6), pages 1443-1467, August.
    11. Meunier, Olivier & Mignolet , Michel & Mulquin, Marie-Eve, 2007. "Interpersonal transfers: Do they impact the growth of poor and rich European regions?," INVESTIGACIONES REGIONALES - Journal of REGIONAL RESEARCH, Asociación Española de Ciencia Regional, issue 10, pages 155-170.
    12. Zsuzsanna Tron, 2009. "Evaluation Methods of European Regional Policy and Reasons for Different Outcomes," Romanian Economic Journal, Department of International Business and Economics from the Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest, vol. 12(32), pages 149-185, (2).
    13. Marco PERCOCO, 2005. "The Impact Of Structural Funds On The Italian Mezzogiorno, 1994-1999," Region et Developpement, Region et Developpement, LEAD, Universite du Sud - Toulon Var, vol. 21, pages 141-153.
    14. Krieger-Boden, Christiane, 2016. "EU cohesion policy, past and present: Sustaining a prospering and fair European Union?," Kiel Working Papers 2037, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    15. Südekum, Jens, 2002. "Subsidizing education in the economic periphery: Another pitfall or regional policies?," HWWA Discussion Papers 209, Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWA).
    16. Wolfgang Eggert & Maximilian Von Ehrlich & Robert Fenge & Günther König, 2007. "Konvergenz‐ und Wachstumseffekte der europäischen Regionalpolitik in Deutschland," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 8(2), pages 130-146, March.
    17. Stéphane Riou, 2003. "Géographie, croissance et politique de cohésion en Europe," Revue Française d'Économie, Programme National Persée, vol. 17(3), pages 171-220.
    18. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/9328 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Roberto Basile & Sergio de Nardis & Alessandro Girardi, 2001. "Regional inequalities and cohesion policies in the european union," ISAE Working Papers 23, ISTAT - Italian National Institute of Statistics - (Rome, ITALY).
    20. Lammers, Konrad & Stiller, Silvia, 2000. "Regionalpolitische Implikationen der neuen ökonomischen Geographie," HWWA Discussion Papers 85, Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWA).
    21. Sarantis Lolos, 2009. "The effect of EU structural funds on regional growth: assessing the evidence from Greece, 1990–2005," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 211-228, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Regional policy; Regional development; Socio-economic factors; European Union; Regions; Economic growth;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C24 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Truncated and Censored Models; Switching Regression Models; Threshold Regression Models
    • O18 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Urban, Rural, Regional, and Transportation Analysis; Housing; Infrastructure
    • R11 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes
    • R58 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - Regional Development Planning and Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:43:y:2009:i:1:p:111-133. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CRES20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.