IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Why haven't economic reforms increased productivity growth in New Zealand?

Listed author(s):
  • Debasis Bandyopadhyay

Productivity, measured by output per hour, grew by less than one percent per annum in post reform New Zealand. During the same period productivity grew at a rate two times faster in relatively protected Australia and one and half time faster in the “free market” economy of the US. This spectacular failure of economic reforms in boosting productivity growth to the international standard calls for an explanation. Unfortunately, nobody has yet offered a theoretical model of economic growth to respond to that call. This paper is an attempt to start that process within the academic discipline established by Solow, Lucas and Prescott, the only three growth economists who are Nobel Laureates. It offers an endogenous growth model with endogenous rent seeking, which adversely affects the economy's total factor productivity (TFP). The model determines TFP as a function of economic policy and not as unexplainable residuals, unlike most previous studies. In particular, it provides explicit formulas for measuring TFP and rent-seeking activity in an economy. The paper argues that well intended economic reforms could nonetheless lead to an endogenous skill shortage that may ironically turn innovators into rent-seekers and in turn, retard productivity growth. Future research may apply this model or a modified version of it to determine if the above argument sheds some light in explaining the productivity puzzle of the post reform era in New Zealand.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Article provided by Taylor & Francis Journals in its journal New Zealand Economic Papers.

Volume (Year): 38 (2004)
Issue (Month): 2 ()
Pages: 219-240

in new window

Handle: RePEc:taf:nzecpp:v:38:y:2004:i:2:p:219-240
DOI: 10.1080/00779950409544404
Contact details of provider: Web page:

Order Information: Web:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:nzecpp:v:38:y:2004:i:2:p:219-240. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.