IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stress Testing and a Comparison of Alternative Methodologies for Scenario Generation


  • Michael Jacobs


A critical question that banking supervisors are trying to answer is what is the amount of capital or liquidity resources required by an institution in order to support the risks taken in the course of business. The financial crises of the last several years have revealed that traditional approaches such as regulatory capital ratios to be inadequate, giving rise to supervisory stress testing as a primary tool. A critical input into this process are macroeconomic scenarios that are provided by the prudential supervisors to institutions for exercises such as the Federal Reserve’s Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (“CCAR†) program. Additionally, supervisors are requiring that banks develop their own macroeconomic scenarios. A common approach is to combine management judgment with a statistical model, such as a Vector Autoregression (“VAR†), to exploit the dependency structure between both macroeconomic drivers, as well between modeling segments. However, it is well-known that linear models such as VAR are unable to explain the phenomenon of fat-tailed distributions that deviate from normality, an empirical fact that has been well documented in the empirical finance literature. We propose a challenger approach, widely used in the academic literature, but not commonly employed in practice, the Markov Switching VAR (“MS-VAR†) model. We empirically test these models using Federal Reserve Y-9 filing and macroeconomic data, gathered and released by the regulators for CCAR purposes, respectively. We find the MS-VAR model to be more conservative than the VAR model, and also to exhibit greater accuracy in model testing, as the latter model can better capture extreme events observed in history.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Jacobs, 2016. "Stress Testing and a Comparison of Alternative Methodologies for Scenario Generation," Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 6(6), pages 1-7.
  • Handle: RePEc:spt:apfiba:v:6:y:2016:i:6:f:6_6_7

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. W. Scott Frame & Andreas Fuster & Joseph Tracy & James Vickery, 2015. "The Rescue of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 29(2), pages 25-52, Spring.
    2. Antonella Foglia, 2009. "Stress Testing Credit Risk: A Survey of Authorities' Aproaches," International Journal of Central Banking, International Journal of Central Banking, vol. 5(3), pages 9-45, September.
    3. Commandeur, Jacques J.F. & Koopman, Siem Jan, 2007. "An Introduction to State Space Time Series Analysis," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199228874.
    4. Asli Demirguc‐Kunt & Enrica Detragiache & Ouarda Merrouche, 2013. "Bank Capital: Lessons from the Financial Crisis," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 45(6), pages 1147-1164, September.
    5. Sims, Christopher A, 1980. "Macroeconomics and Reality," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 48(1), pages 1-48, January.
    6. Merton, Robert C, 1974. "On the Pricing of Corporate Debt: The Risk Structure of Interest Rates," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 29(2), pages 449-470, May.
    7. Andrew McKenna & Rhys Bidder, 2014. "Robust Stress Testing," 2014 Meeting Papers 853, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    8. Goldfeld, Stephen M. & Quandt, Richard E., 1973. "A Markov model for switching regressions," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 3-15, March.
    9. Hamilton, James D., 1988. "Rational-expectations econometric analysis of changes in regime : An investigation of the term structure of interest rates," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 12(2-3), pages 385-423.
    10. Hulusi Inanoglu & Michael Jacobs, 2009. "Models for Risk Aggregation and Sensitivity Analysis: An Application to Bank Economic Capital," Journal of Risk and Financial Management, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 2(1), pages 1-72, December.
    11. Schuermann, Til, 2014. "Stress testing banks," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 717-728.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spt:apfiba:v:6:y:2016:i:6:f:6_6_7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Eleftherios Spyromitros-Xioufis). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.