IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v13y2020i2p28-d316617.html

Banking Finance Experts Consensus on Compliance in US Bank Holding Companies: An e-Delphi Study

Author

Listed:
  • Sophia Velez

    (College of Management and Technology, School of Management, Walden University, 100 Washington Avenue South, Suite 900, Minneapolis, MN 55401, USA
    Sophia Velez has worked over 16 years as a Certified Public Accountant (CPA) with large banks providing consulting services. As a CPA, she worked for firms such as PriceWaterhoCoopers LLP (PwC) where she performed financial audits and attestation services for large banks.)

  • Michael Neubert

    (School of Management, International School of Management Paris, 17 Boulevard Raspail, 75007 Paris, France)

  • Daphne Halkias

    (School of Management, International School of Management Paris, 17 Boulevard Raspail, 75007 Paris, France)

Abstract

Compliance measures emphasized in the Dodd-Frank Bill 2010, Section 165 is a response to the 2008 financial crisis, that requires large banks to maintain a minimum capital ratio. The Federal Reserve Bank (Fed) regulates capital of Bank Holding Companies (BHC) through compliance Supervisory Capital Assessment Program (SCAP) 2009 and Comprehensive Capital Adequacy Review (CCAR) 2011 annual stress test of capital. The Fed imposed a minimum capital ratio of 8% that has derailed the risk management objective of capital adequacy, as bank managers are forced to take on more risk to meet the capital ratio. This study concerns senior manager practices that can be effective in meeting compliance requirements posed by the Fed for BHCs. Through a qualitative e-Delphi study, 10 banking finance experts were convened to build consensus on senior manager’s practices that can be effective in meeting compliance requirements. Data were collected from three electronic questionnaires submitted through Qualtrics. Data were analyzed using theoretical triangulation, coding, and thematic analysis. Four important considerations were identified that could bolster compliance measures effectiveness: (a) emphasis placed on understanding regulatory consultant compliance, (b) maintenance of effective and independent compliance align to organizational objectives, (c) clear definition of data source for compliance analytics. These considerations of compliance practices may help senior bank managers reduce risky behaviors and investments that cause significant bank losses.

Suggested Citation

  • Sophia Velez & Michael Neubert & Daphne Halkias, 2020. "Banking Finance Experts Consensus on Compliance in US Bank Holding Companies: An e-Delphi Study," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-14, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:13:y:2020:i:2:p:28-:d:316617
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/13/2/28/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/13/2/28/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Musa Darayseh & Abdelaziz Chazi, 2018. "Bank Specifics, Economics Environment, And Agency Theory: Determinants Of Banking Performance In GCC," Journal of Developing Areas, Tennessee State University, College of Business, vol. 52(4), pages 199-212, October-D.
    2. Alessandra Tanda, 2015. "The Effects of Bank Regulation on the Relationship Between Capital and Risk," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 57(1), pages 31-54, March.
    3. Cynthia P. Iglesias & Alexander Thompson & Wolf H. Rogowski & Katherine Payne, 2016. "Reporting Guidelines for the Use of Expert Judgement in Model-Based Economic Evaluations," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 34(11), pages 1161-1172, November.
    4. Natasha Sarin & Lawrence H. Summers, 2016. "Understanding Bank Risk through Market Measures," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 47(2 (Fall)), pages 57-127.
    5. Herring, Richard J., 2016. "Less Really Can Be More: Why Simplicity and Comparability Should be Regulatory Objectives," Working Papers 16-08, University of Pennsylvania, Wharton School, Weiss Center.
    6. Natasha Sarin & Lawrence H. Summers, 2016. "Understanding Bank Risk through Market Measures," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 47(2 (Fall)), pages 57-127.
    7. Krishnan Dandapani & Edward R. Lawrence & Fernando M. Patterson, 2017. "The effect of holding company affiliation on bank risk and the 2008 financial crisis," Studies in Economics and Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 34(1), pages 105-121, March.
    8. Gong, Di & Huizinga, Harry & Laeven, Luc, 2018. "Nonconsolidated affiliates, bank capitalization, and risk taking," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 109-129.
    9. William C. Handorf, 2017. "Regulatory ratios, CDS spreads, and credit ratings in a favorable economic environment," Journal of Banking Regulation, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(3), pages 268-285, July.
    10. Heba Abou-El-Sood, 2017. "Corporate governance structure and capital adequacy: implications to bank risk taking," International Journal of Managerial Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 13(2), pages 165-185, April.
    11. Franklin Allen & Itay Goldstein & Julapa Jagtiani & William W. Lang, 2016. "Enhancing Prudential Standards in Financial Regulations," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 49(2), pages 133-149, June.
    12. Shin Fukuda, 2016. "Bank’s Capital Requirements in the Business Cycle: A DSGE Analysis with a News Shock," Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 6(3), pages 1-8.
    13. Michael Jacobs, 2016. "Stress Testing and a Comparison of Alternative Methodologies for Scenario Generation," Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 6(6), pages 1-7.
    14. Li Lian Ong & Ceyla Pazarbasioglu, 2014. "Credibility and Crisis Stress Testing," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-67, February.
    15. Pavel Kapinos & Oscar A. Mitnik, 2016. "A Top-down Approach to Stress-testing Banks," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 49(2), pages 229-264, June.
    16. Margit Osterloh & Bruno S. Frey, 2000. "Motivation, Knowledge Transfer, and Organizational Forms," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(5), pages 538-550, October.
    17. James W. Kolari & Ivan Pastor Sanz, 2017. "Systemic risk measurement in banking using self-organizing maps," Journal of Banking Regulation, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(4), pages 338-358, November.
    18. Dan Costin NIÞESCU & Florin Alexandru DUNA, 2016. "Liquidity Management and the Banking Lending Mechanism," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 17(4), pages 403-413, October.
    19. Alexander Denev & Yaacov Mutnikas, 2016. "A formalized, integrated and visual approach to stress testing," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(4), pages 189-216, December.
    20. Kevin Dowd & Martin Hutchinson, 2016. "Learning the Right Lessons from the Financial Crisis," Cato Journal, Cato Journal, Cato Institute, vol. 36(2), pages 393-413, Spring/Su.
    21. Ronald William Eastburn & Alex Sharland, 2017. "Risk management and managerial mindset," Journal of Risk Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 18(1), pages 21-47, January.
    22. Richard J. Herring, 2016. "Less Really Can be More: Why Simplicity & Comparability Should be Regulatory Objectives," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 44(1), pages 33-50, March.
    23. Umara Noreen & Fizza Alamdar & Tabassum Tariq, 2016. "Capital Buffers and Bank Risk: Empirical Study of Adjustment of Pakistani Banks," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 6(4), pages 1798-1806.
    24. Tilo Bellof & Carsten S. Wehn, 2018. "On the Treatment of Model Risk in the Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process," Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 8(4), pages 1-1.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Akartuna, Eray Arda & Johnson, Shane D. & Thornton, Amy, 2022. "Preventing the money laundering and terrorist financing risks of emerging technologies: An international policy Delphi study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    2. Sophia Beckett Velez, 2021. "Idiosyncratic Viral Loss Theory: Systemic Operational Losses in Banks," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-13, February.
    3. Ewa Głuszek, 2021. "Use of the e-Delphi Method to Validate the Corporate Reputation Management Maturity Model (CR3M)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-28, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sophia Beckett Velez, 2021. "Idiosyncratic Viral Loss Theory: Systemic Operational Losses in Banks," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-13, February.
    2. Douglas da Rosa München & Herbert Kimura, 2020. "Regulatory Banking Leverage: what do you know?," Working Papers Series 540, Central Bank of Brazil, Research Department.
    3. Acharya, Viral V. & Berger, Allen N. & Roman, Raluca A., 2018. "Lending implications of U.S. bank stress tests: Costs or benefits?," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 58-90.
    4. Stephen Matteo Miller & Blake Hoarty, 2021. "On regulation and excess reserves: The case of Basel III," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 44(2), pages 215-247, June.
    5. G. Gospodarchuk G. & Г. Господарчук Г., 2019. "Резервный буфер капитала как инструмент макропруденциальной политики // Reserve Capital buffer as an Instrument of Macroprudential Policy," Финансы: теория и практика/Finance: Theory and Practice // Finance: Theory and Practice, ФГОБУВО Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации // Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation, vol. 23(4), pages 43-56.
    6. Ogawa, Toshiaki, 2022. "Welfare implications of bank capital requirements under dynamic default decisions," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    7. Clark, Brian & Jones, Jonathan & Malmquist, David, 2023. "Leverage and the cost of capital for U.S. banks," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    8. Kohlscheen, Emanuel & Takáts, Előd, 2021. "What can commercial property performance reveal about bank valuations?," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    9. Toshiaki Ogawa, 2020. "Welfare Implications of Bank Capital Requirements under Dynamic Default Decisions," IMES Discussion Paper Series 20-E-03, Institute for Monetary and Economic Studies, Bank of Japan.
    10. Favara, Giovanni & Ivanov, Ivan & Rezende, Marcelo, 2021. "GSIB surcharges and bank lending: Evidence from US corporate loan data," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(3), pages 1426-1443.
    11. Barth, James R. & Miller, Stephen Matteo, 2018. "Benefits and costs of a higher bank “leverage ratio”," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 37-52.
    12. Axel Per Hedström & Gazi Salah Uddin & Md Lutfur Rahman & Bo Sjö, 2024. "Systemic risk in the Scandinavian banking sector," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(1), pages 581-608, January.
    13. Herstatt, Cornelius & Tiwari, Rajnish, 2020. "Opportunities of frugality in the post-Corona era," Working Papers 110, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute for Technology and Innovation Management.
    14. Anna Kovner & Peter Van Tassel, 2022. "Evaluating Regulatory Reform: Banks' Cost of Capital and Lending," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 54(5), pages 1313-1367, August.
    15. Mark Mink & Sebastiaan Pool, 2018. "Bank Recapitalizations, Credit Supply, and the Transmission of Monetary Policy," DNB Working Papers 616, Netherlands Central Bank, Research Department.
    16. Whited, Toni M. & Wu, Yufeng & Xiao, Kairong, 2021. "Low interest rates and risk incentives for banks with market power," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 155-174.
    17. Richter Toni, 2021. "Bankenwettbewerb und die Stabilität von Finanzsektoren: Nur eine Frage der Messmethode?," Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 70(1), pages 1-36, May.
    18. David Aikman & Andrew Haldane & Marc Hinterschweiger & Sujit Kapadia, 2018. "Rethinking financial stability," Bank of England working papers 712, Bank of England.
    19. Richard B. Berner & Stephen G. Cecchetti & Kermit L. Schoenholtz, 2019. "Stress Testing Networks: The Case of Central Counterparties," NBER Working Papers 25686, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. Gomes, João F. & Grotteria, Marco & Wachter, Jessica A., 2023. "Foreseen risks," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:13:y:2020:i:2:p:28-:d:316617. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.