IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v125y2020i1d10.1007_s11192-020-03670-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bibliometric assessment of papers on generations in management and business journals

Author

Listed:
  • Maximiano Ortiz-Pimentel

    (Universidad Católica del Norte)

  • Carlos Molina

    (Universidad Católica del Norte)

  • Guillermo Armando Ronda-Pupo

    (Universidad de Holguín)

Abstract

The objective of this study is to show the dynamics of the evolution on research of the generations by means of analysis of journal publications from the category of management and business from Clarivate Analytics Web of Science. Bibliometric analysis is used to unveil the authors, journals, institutions, and the most influential countries on the subject from 2001 to date. The most pertinent studies are presented that show the main characteristics of the five generations that can currently be found in the workplace, namely the Silent Generation, Baby Boomers, Generation X, Generation Y and Generation Z. The results highlight that the studies focus on countries and regions with more developed economies. Studies are scarcer from countries and regions with emerging economies such as Latin America and the Caribbean, Africa, Eastern Europe and the Middle East. Likewise, there is evidence of the lack of qualitative studies on Generation Z, which will be of greater importance in the labour force or employment market and with higher purchasing power. The results add knowledge to academics to define their research strategies. For the practitioners it contributes information on the most pertinent academics on the study of generations, which facilitates potential candidates to contract or hire in case they need to study the characteristics of their workforce to define recruitment policies, career planning or motivation.

Suggested Citation

  • Maximiano Ortiz-Pimentel & Carlos Molina & Guillermo Armando Ronda-Pupo, 2020. "Bibliometric assessment of papers on generations in management and business journals," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(1), pages 445-469, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:125:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-020-03670-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-020-03670-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-020-03670-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-020-03670-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Herranz, Neus & Ruiz-Castillo, Javier, 2012. "Sub-field normalization in the multiplicative case: Average-based citation indicators," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 6(4), pages 543-556.
    2. Rebecca VanMeter & Douglas Grisaffe & Lawrence Chonko & James Roberts, 2013. "Generation Y’s Ethical Ideology and Its Potential Workplace Implications," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 117(1), pages 93-109, September.
    3. Noble, Stephanie M. & Haytko, Diana L. & Phillips, Joanna, 2009. "What drives college-age Generation Y consumers?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(6), pages 617-628, June.
    4. Pan, Xuelian & Yan, Erjia & Cui, Ming & Hua, Weina, 2018. "Examining the usage, citation, and diffusion patterns of bibliometric mapping software: A comparative study of three tools," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 481-493.
    5. Campbell, W. Keith & Campbell, Stacy M. & Siedor, Lane E. & Twenge, Jean M., 2015. "Generational Differences Are Real and Useful," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(3), pages 324-331, September.
    6. Finardi, Ugo, 2013. "Correlation between Journal Impact Factor and Citation Performance: An experimental study," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 7(2), pages 357-370.
    7. Funches, Venessa & Yarber-Allen, Annice & Johnson, Kimberly, 2017. "Generational and family structural differences in male attitudes and orientations towards shopping," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 101-108.
    8. Carolyn P. Egri & David A. Ralston, 2004. "Generation Cohorts and Personal Values: A Comparison of China and the United States," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(2), pages 210-220, April.
    9. Neus Herranz & Javier Ruiz-Castillo, 2012. "Sub-field normalization in the multiplicative case: High- and low-impact citation indicators," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 21(2), pages 113-125, April.
    10. Quintal, Vanessa & Phau, Ian & Sims, Daniel & Cheah, Isaac, 2016. "Factors influencing generation Y’s purchase intentions of prototypical versus me-too brands," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 175-183.
    11. Waltman, Ludo, 2016. "A review of the literature on citation impact indicators," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 365-391.
    12. Katarzyna Klimkiewicz & Victor Oltra, 2017. "Does CSR Enhance Employer Attractiveness? The Role of Millennial Job Seekers' Attitudes," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(5), pages 449-463, September.
    13. Stremersch, Stefan & Camacho, Nuno & Vanneste, Sofie & Verniers, Isabel, 2015. "Unraveling scientific impact: Citation types in marketing journals," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 64-77.
    14. Shuang Ren & Yuhua Xie & Ying Zhu & Malcolm Warner, 2018. "New generation employees’ preferences towards leadership style in China," Asia Pacific Business Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 437-458, August.
    15. Silvia A. Nelson, 2012. "Affective commitment of generational cohorts of Brazilian nurses," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 33(7), pages 804-821, October.
    16. Ole Ellegaard & Johan A. Wallin, 2015. "The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(3), pages 1809-1831, December.
    17. Andre A. Pekerti & Denni Arli, 2017. "Do Cultural and Generational Cohorts Matter to Ideologies and Consumer Ethics? A Comparative Study of Australians, Indonesians, and Indonesian Migrants in Australia," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(2), pages 387-404, June.
    18. Chuah, Stephanie Hui-Wen & Marimuthu, Malliga & Kandampully, Jay & Bilgihan, Anil, 2017. "What drives Gen Y loyalty? Understanding the mediated moderating roles of switching costs and alternative attractiveness in the value-satisfaction-loyalty chain," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 124-136.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ladhari, Riadh & Gonthier, Jessica & Lajante, Mathieu, 2019. "Generation Y and online fashion shopping: Orientations and profiles," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 113-121.
    2. Dunaiski, Marcel & Geldenhuys, Jaco & Visser, Willem, 2019. "On the interplay between normalisation, bias, and performance of paper impact metrics," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 270-290.
    3. Guillermo Armando Ronda-Pupo, 2020. "The performance of Latin American research on economics & business," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 122(1), pages 573-590, January.
    4. Albarrán, Pedro & Herrero, Carmen & Ruiz-Castillo, Javier & Villar, Antonio, 2017. "The Herrero-Villar approach to citation impact," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 11(2), pages 625-640.
    5. Yunrong Li & Javier Ruiz-Castillo, 2014. "The impact of extreme observations in citation distributions," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 23(2), pages 174-182.
    6. Yurij L. Katchanov & Yulia V. Markova, 2017. "The “space of physics journals”: topological structure and the Journal Impact Factor," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 113(1), pages 313-333, October.
    7. Ahmet Alkan Çelik & Mert Kılıç & Erkut Altındağ & Volkan Öngel & Ayşe Günsel, 2021. "Does the Reflection of Foci of Commitment in Job Performance Weaken as Generations Get Younger? A Comparison between Gen X and Gen Y Employees," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.
    8. Sabina Lissitsa & Ofrit Kol, 2021. "Four generational cohorts and hedonic m-shopping: association between personality traits and purchase intention," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 545-570, June.
    9. Ruiz-Castillo, Javier & Costas, Rodrigo, 2014. "The skewness of scientific productivity," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 8(4), pages 917-934.
    10. Siluo Yang & Xin Xing & Dietmar Wolfram, 2018. "Difference in the impact of open-access papers published by China and the USA," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 115(2), pages 1017-1037, May.
    11. Hu, Zhigang & Tian, Wencan & Xu, Shenmeng & Zhang, Chunbo & Wang, Xianwen, 2018. "Four pitfalls in normalizing citation indicators: An investigation of ESI’s selection of highly cited papers," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 1133-1145.
    12. Tol, Richard S.J., 2013. "Identifying excellent researchers: A new approach," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 7(4), pages 803-810.
    13. Khan, Muhammad Asif & Pattnaik, Debidutta & Ashraf, Rohail & Ali, Imtiaz & Kumar, Satish & Donthu, Naveen, 2021. "Value of special issues in the journal of business research: A bibliometric analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 295-313.
    14. H. Kent Baker & Satish Kumar & Kirti Goyal & Prashant Gupta, 2023. "International journal of finance and economics: A bibliometric overview," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(1), pages 9-46, January.
    15. Herranz, Neus & Ruiz-Castillo, Javier, 2012. "Sub-field normalization in the multiplicative case: Average-based citation indicators," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 6(4), pages 543-556.
    16. Melović, Boban & Šehović, Damir & Karadžić, Vesna & Dabić, Marina & Ćirović, Dragana, 2021. "Determinants of Millennials' behavior in online shopping – Implications on consumers’ satisfaction and e-business development," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    17. Marcelo Mendoza, 2021. "Differences in Citation Patterns across Areas, Article Types and Age Groups of Researchers," Publications, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-23, October.
    18. Alfirević Nikša & Pavičić Jurica & Rendulić Darko, 2023. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Public Business School Scientific Productivity and Impact in South-East Europe (2017-2021)," South East European Journal of Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 18(1), pages 27-45, June.
    19. Emili Vizuete-Luciano & Oktay Güzel & José M. Merigó, 2023. "Bibliometric research of the Pay-What-You-Want Topic," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(5), pages 413-426, October.
    20. Waltman, Ludo & van Eck, Nees Jan, 2015. "Field-normalized citation impact indicators and the choice of an appropriate counting method," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 9(4), pages 872-894.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Bibliometric analysis; Business; Citation analysis; Generations; Management;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M1 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:125:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-020-03670-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.