IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/reihed/v66y2025i3d10.1007_s11162-025-09838-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stakeholder Perspectives on Rankings of Higher Education Institutions: A Structural Equation Modeling Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Melike Çağlayan

    (Jagiellonian University)

  • Ece Çağlayan

    (Middle East Technical University)

  • Cengiz Acartürk

    (Jagiellonian University)

Abstract

This study analyzes the factors influencing the stakeholder perspectives on of Higher Education Institution (HEI) rankings, reporting data collected from 1232 participants through a survey method and employing the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT2) model and complementary models for the analyses. Our primary focus was to identify the relationships between various predictor variables influencing the perception of HEI rankings. We analyzed how demographic variables, such as age, gender, job experience, and employment status, might moderate these relationships. The key findings show that certain model dimensions, such has Performance Expectancy, Price Value, Habit, Hedonic Motivation, Perceived Information Quality, Perceived Trust, and Awareness significantly influence participants’ behavioral intentions and actual use of the HEI rankings. Overall, this study provides a quantitative perspective to perception of HEI rankings from a stakeholders’ point of view, reflecting similarities and differences among various participants.

Suggested Citation

  • Melike Çağlayan & Ece Çağlayan & Cengiz Acartürk, 2025. "Stakeholder Perspectives on Rankings of Higher Education Institutions: A Structural Equation Modeling Analysis," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 66(3), pages 1-38, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:reihed:v:66:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s11162-025-09838-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s11162-025-09838-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11162-025-09838-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11162-025-09838-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daraio, Cinzia & Bonaccorsi, Andrea & Simar, Léopold, 2015. "Rankings and university performance: A conditional multidimensional approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(3), pages 918-930.
    2. Kwok Tong Soo, 2013. "Does anyone use information from university rankings?," Education Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2), pages 176-190, March.
    3. Yogesh K. Dwivedi & Nripendra P. Rana & Anand Jeyaraj & Marc Clement & Michael D. Williams, 2019. "Re-examining the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT): Towards a Revised Theoretical Model," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 719-734, June.
    4. Tamilmani, Kuttimani & Rana, Nripendra P. & Wamba, Samuel Fosso & Dwivedi, Rohita, 2021. "The extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT2): A systematic literature review and theory evaluation," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    5. Fred D. Davis & Richard P. Bagozzi & Paul R. Warshaw, 1989. "User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(8), pages 982-1003, August.
    6. Jill Johnes, 2018. "University rankings: What do they really show?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 115(1), pages 585-606, April.
    7. Marlo M Vernon & E Andrew Balas & Shaher Momani, 2018. "Are university rankings useful to improve research? A systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(3), pages 1-15, March.
    8. Alalwan, Ali Abdallah, 2018. "Investigating the impact of social media advertising features on customer purchase intention," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 65-77.
    9. NoorUl Ain & Kiran Kaur & Mehwish Waheed, 2016. "The influence of learning value on learning management system use," Post-Print hal-03882190, HAL.
    10. Isidro F. Aguillo & Judit Bar-Ilan & Mark Levene & José Luis Ortega, 2010. "Comparing university rankings," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 85(1), pages 243-256, October.
    11. Sarstedt, Marko & Hair, Joseph F. & Ringle, Christian M. & Thiele, Kai O. & Gudergan, Siegfried P., 2016. "Estimation issues with PLS and CBSEM: Where the bias lies!," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 3998-4010.
    12. Dash, Ganesh & Paul, Justin, 2021. "CB-SEM vs PLS-SEM methods for research in social sciences and technology forecasting," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    13. Frenken, Koen & Heimeriks, Gaston J. & Hoekman, Jarno, 2017. "What drives university research performance? An analysis using the CWTS Leiden Ranking data," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 11(3), pages 859-872.
    14. Kieran Mathieson, 1991. "Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 2(3), pages 173-191, September.
    15. Joseph F. Hair & G. Tomas M. Hult & Christian M. Ringle & Marko Sarstedt & Kai Oliver Thiele, 2017. "Mirror, mirror on the wall: a comparative evaluation of composite-based structural equation modeling methods," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(5), pages 616-632, September.
    16. Gualberto Buela-Casal & Olga Gutiérrez-Martínez & María Paz Bermúdez-Sánchez & Oscar Vadillo-Muñoz, 2007. "Comparative study of international academic rankings of universities," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 71(3), pages 349-365, June.
    17. Kuttimani Tamilmani & Nripendra P. Rana & Yogesh K. Dwivedi, 2021. "Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: A Meta-Analytic Evaluation of UTAUT2," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 987-1005, August.
    18. Simon Hix, 2004. "A Global Ranking of Political Science Departments," Political Studies Review, Political Studies Association, vol. 2(3), pages 293-313, September.
    19. Anne‐Wil Harzing & Ron van der Wal, 2009. "A Google Scholar h‐index for journals: An alternative metric to measure journal impact in economics and business," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 60(1), pages 41-46, January.
    20. John Hulland, 1999. "Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(2), pages 195-204, February.
    21. Samuel Natale & Caroline Doran, 2012. "Marketization of Education: An Ethical Dilemma," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 105(2), pages 187-196, January.
    22. Mu-Hsuan Huang, 2012. "Opening the black box of QS World University Rankings," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 21(1), pages 71-78, February.
    23. Erjia Yan & Zheng Chen & Kai Li, 2020. "Authors' status and the perceived quality of their work: Measuring citation sentiment change in nobel articles," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 71(3), pages 314-324, March.
    24. Oğuzhan Alaşehir & Murat Perit Çakır & Cengiz Acartürk & Nazife Baykal & Ural Akbulut, 2014. "URAP-TR: a national ranking for Turkish universities based on academic performance," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 101(1), pages 159-178, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cristopher Siegfried Kopplin, 2021. "Two heads are better than one: matchmaking tools in coworking spaces," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 1045-1069, May.
    2. El Gibari, Samira & Gómez, Trinidad & Ruiz, Francisco, 2018. "Evaluating university performance using reference point based composite indicators," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 1235-1250.
    3. Christian Nitzl & Wynne W. Chin, 2017. "The case of partial least squares (PLS) path modeling in managerial accounting research," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 137-156, May.
    4. Vieira, Valter Afonso & Rafael, Diego Nogueira & Agnihotri, Raj, 2022. "Augmented reality generalizations: A meta-analytical review on consumer-related outcomes and the mediating role of hedonic and utilitarian values," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 170-184.
    5. Pinto-Delacadena, Pablo A. & Liern, Vicente & Acosta-Vargas, Patricia & Vinueza-Cabezas, Andrea, 2024. "A multicriteria approach to ranking Latin-American universities based on region-specific criteria," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    6. Lai-Ying Leong & Teck-Soon Hew & Keng-Boon Ooi & Bhimaraya Metri & Yogesh K. Dwivedi, 2023. "Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior in the Social Commerce Context: A Meta-Analytic SEM (MASEM) Approach," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(5), pages 1847-1879, October.
    7. Saghafi, Fatemeh & Noorzad Moghaddam, Ehsan & Aslani, Alireza, 2017. "Examining effective factors in initial acceptance of high-tech localized technologies: Xamin, Iranian localized operating system," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 275-288.
    8. Massucci, Francesco Alessandro & Docampo, Domingo, 2019. "Measuring the academic reputation through citation networks via PageRank," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 185-201.
    9. Konstantinos Dendrinos & George Spais, 2024. "An investigation of selected UTAUT constructs and consumption values of Gen Z and Gen X for mobile banking services and behavioral intentions to facilitate the adoption of mobile apps," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(3), pages 492-522, September.
    10. ETTIS Saïd Aboubaker & ELDABET Mahmoud Mohamed, 2022. "The Move Towards Cashless Society: How To Improve Consumers’ Use Of Bank Cards In Retail Stores?," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 17(1), pages 24-10, April.
    11. Hauff, Sven & Richter, Nicole Franziska & Sarstedt, Marko & Ringle, Christian M., 2024. "Importance and performance in PLS-SEM and NCA: Introducing the combined importance-performance map analysis (cIPMA)," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    12. Bielefeldt, Jonas & Poelzl, Jana & Herbst, Uta, 2016. "What’s Mine Isn’t Yours – Barriers to Participation in the Sharing Economy," Die Unternehmung - Swiss Journal of Business Research and Practice, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 70(1), pages 4-25.
    13. Christopher R. Plouffe & John S. Hulland & Mark Vandenbosch, 2001. "Research Report: Richness Versus Parsimony in Modeling Technology Adoption Decisions—Understanding Merchant Adoption of a Smart Card-Based Payment System," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(2), pages 208-222, June.
    14. Camilleri, Mark Anthony & Camilleri, Adriana Caterina, 2022. "Remote learning via video conferencing technologies: Implications for research and practice," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    15. Joon-ho Kim & Kwang-jin Kim & Bum-tae Park & Hyun-ju Choi, 2022. "The Phenomenon and Development of K-Pop: The Relationship between Success Factors of K-Pop and the National Image, Social Network Service Citizenship Behavior, and Tourist Behavioral Intention," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-30, March.
    16. Amir Brudner & Arieh Gavious, 2024. "A dynamic model of investment in research and teaching facilities in academic institutions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 343(1), pages 67-85, December.
    17. Hasan Sadık Tatlı & Tuba Bıyıkbeyi & Gülşah Gençer Çelik & Gökten Öngel, 2024. "Paperless Technologies in Universities: Examination in Terms of Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-20, March.
    18. Escobar-Rodríguez, Tomás & Bartual-Sopena, Lourdes, 2015. "Impact of cultural factors on attitude toward using ERP systems in public hospitals," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 127-137.
    19. Manjit Kour, 2024. "Understanding the drivers of green consumption: a study on consumer behavior, environmental ethics, and sustainable choices for achieving SDG 12," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 4(9), pages 1-27, September.
    20. Jörg Henseler & Nick Lee & Ellen Roemer & Ildikó Kemény & Taşkın Dirsehan & John W. Cadogan, 2024. "Beware of the Woozle effect and belief perseverance in the PLS-SEM literature!," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 715-744, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:reihed:v:66:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s11162-025-09838-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.