IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/pubtra/v10y2018i3d10.1007_s12469-018-0191-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial bus priority schemes, implementation challenges and needs: an overview and directions for future studies

Author

Listed:
  • Nima Dadashzadeh

    (Istanbul Technical University
    University of Ljubljana)

  • Murat Ergun

    (Istanbul Technical University)

Abstract

Urban transit systems consist of multiple modes of transport of which cars and buses make up the largest portion, particularly in developing countries. Thus, theories on the best means of allocating existing road spaces for cars and buses in city-centers and suburban corridors in order to improve operational transport efficiency has become a frontier research topic. Today, bus priority (BP) methods, as one of the most widely used Public Transport Priority (PTP) strategies, are commonly recognized as effective in lowering traffic congestion and reducing bus travel times. PT authorities, urban planners/designers, and researchers dealing with PT issues (i.e. buses), need to investigate existing BP methods in detail and assess relevant research before setting about designing or implementing new policies. Of course, evaluating such studies is a time-consuming process. In order to address this constraint, the present study proposes a general typology of existing BP methods and evaluates the challenges and requirements regarding their implementation by conducting a comprehensive literature review of existing studies related to PTP. Academic papers (theoretical, analytical, and simulation-based), technical reports, and design manual/guidelines in the context of both developed and developing countries have been searched as part of the literature review process. The study concludes by proposing two comparative summary tables of all spatial bus priority schemes in terms of “min. requirements to justify BP schemes” and “advantages and disadvantages of time-based and spatial BP treatments”. These may provide engineers, urban planners or transit policy-makers with an accessible guide with which to refer in the evaluation stage. However, future research is recommended in order to bridge existing gaps concerning conditions required for the successful implementation of spatial bus priority strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Nima Dadashzadeh & Murat Ergun, 2018. "Spatial bus priority schemes, implementation challenges and needs: an overview and directions for future studies," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 545-570, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:pubtra:v:10:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s12469-018-0191-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s12469-018-0191-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12469-018-0191-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12469-018-0191-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hensher, David A., 1998. "The imbalance between car and public transport use in urban Australia: why does it exist?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 5(4), pages 193-204, October.
    2. Beirão, Gabriela & Sarsfield Cabral, J.A., 2007. "Understanding attitudes towards public transport and private car: A qualitative study," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 14(6), pages 478-489, November.
    3. Alpkokin, Pelin & Ergun, Murat, 2012. "Istanbul Metrobüs: first intercontinental bus rapid transit," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 58-66.
    4. Todd, Michael, 2006. "Enhanced Transit Strategies: Bus Lanes with Intermittent Priority and ITS Technology Architectures for TOD Enhancement," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt8h1969p9, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    5. Dingxin Wu & Wei Deng & Yan Song & Jian Wang & Dewen Kong, 2017. "Evaluating Operational Effects of Bus Lane with Intermittent Priority under Connected Vehicle Environments," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-13, April.
    6. Eichler, Michael & Daganzo, Carlos F., 2006. "Bus lanes with intermittent priority: Strategy formulae and an evaluation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 40(9), pages 731-744, November.
    7. Gu, Weihua & Gayah, Vikash V. & Cassidy, Michael J. & Saade, Nathalie, 2014. "On the impacts of bus stops near signalized intersections: Models of car and bus delays," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 123-140.
    8. Ibarra-Rojas, O.J. & Delgado, F. & Giesen, R. & Muñoz, J.C., 2015. "Planning, operation, and control of bus transport systems: A literature review," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 38-75.
    9. Menendez, Monica & Daganzo, Carlos F., 2007. "Effects of HOV lanes on freeway bottlenecks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(8), pages 809-822, October.
    10. Wu, Jianping & Hounsell, Nick, 1998. "Bus Priority Using pre-signals," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 32(8), pages 563-583, November.
    11. Zhu, H.B., 2010. "Numerical study of urban traffic flow with dedicated bus lane and intermittent bus lane," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(16), pages 3134-3139.
    12. Gu, Weihua & Cassidy, Michael J., 2013. "Maximizing bus discharge flows from multi-berth stops by regulating exit maneuvers," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 254-264.
    13. Guler, S. Ilgin & Menendez, Monica, 2014. "Analytical formulation and empirical evaluation of pre-signals for bus priority," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 41-53.
    14. Graham Currie & Majid Sarvi & Bill Young, 2007. "A new approach to evaluating on-road public transport priority projects: balancing the demand for limited road-space," Transportation, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 413-428, July.
    15. Skabardonis, Alexander, 1998. "Control Strategies For Transit Priority," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt70r4c8xm, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    16. Gu, Weihua & Cassidy, Michael J. & Gayah, Vikash V. & Ouyang, Yanfeng, 2013. "Mitigating negative impacts of near-side bus stops on cars," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 42-56.
    17. Eichler, Michael & Daganzo, Carlos F., 2005. "Bus Lanes with Intermittent Priority: Screening Formulae and an Evaluation," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt7881w553, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yuriy Royko & Yevhen Fornalchyk & Eugeniusz Koda & Ivan Kernytskyy & Oleh Hrytsun & Romana Bura & Piotr Osinski & Anna Markiewicz & Tomasz Wierzbicki & Ruslan Barabash & Ruslan Humenuyk & Pavlo Polyan, 2023. "Public Transport Prioritization and Descriptive Criteria-Based Urban Sections Classification on Arterial Streets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-15, January.
    2. Victoria Gitelman & Anna Korchatov & Wafa Elias, 2020. "An Examination of the Safety Impacts of Bus Priority Routes in Major Israeli Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-17, October.
    3. Nima Dadashzadeh & Murat Ergun, 2019. "An Integrated Variable Speed Limit and ALINEA Ramp Metering Model in the Presence of High Bus Volume," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-26, November.
    4. Robert Rijavec & Nima Dadashzadeh & Marijan Žura & Rok Marsetič, 2020. "Park and Pool Lots’ Impact on Promoting Shared Mobility and Carpooling on Highways: The Case of Slovenia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-19, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bomin Bian & Michael Pinedo & Ning Zhu & Shoufeng Ma, 2019. "Performance Analysis of Overtaking Maneuvers at Bus Stops with Tandem Berths," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(2), pages 597-618, March.
    2. Anderson, Paul & Geroliminis, Nikolas, 2020. "Dynamic lane restrictions on congested arterials," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 224-243.
    3. Nicolas Chiabaut & Anais Barcet, 2019. "Demonstration and evaluation of an intermittent bus lane strategy," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 443-456, October.
    4. Hu, Sangen & Shen, Minyu & Gu, Weihua, 2023. "Impacts of bus overtaking policies on the capacity of bus stops," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    5. Tang, Qing & Hu, Xianbiao & Lu, Jiawei & Zhou, Xuesong, 2021. "Analytical characterization of multi-state effective discharge rates for bus-only lane conversion scheduling problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 106-131.
    6. Haitao, He & Menendez, Monica & Ilgin Guler, S., 2018. "Analytical evaluation of flexible-sharing strategies on multimodal arterials," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 114(PB), pages 364-379.
    7. Murat Bayrak & S. Ilgin Guler, 2021. "Optimization of dedicated bus lane location on a transportation network while accounting for traffic dynamics," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 325-347, June.
    8. Shen, Minyu & Gu, Weihua & Hu, Sangen & Cheng, Han, 2019. "Capacity approximations for near- and far-side bus stops in dedicated bus lanes," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 94-120.
    9. Chow, Andy H.F. & Li, Shuai & Zhong, Renxin, 2017. "Multi-objective optimal control formulations for bus service reliability with traffic signals," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 248-268.
    10. Loder, Allister & Bliemer, Michiel C.J. & Axhausen, Kay W., 2022. "Optimal pricing and investment in a multi-modal city — Introducing a macroscopic network design problem based on the MFD," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 113-132.
    11. Guler, S. Ilgin & Menendez, Monica, 2014. "Analytical formulation and empirical evaluation of pre-signals for bus priority," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 41-53.
    12. Yutong Sun & Jin Li & Xiaozhong Wei & Yuling Jiao, 2021. "Tandem Design of Bus Priority Based on a Pre-Signal System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-19, September.
    13. Jaroslav Burian & Lenka Zajíčková & Igor Ivan & Karel Macků, 2018. "Attitudes and Motivation to Use Public or Individual Transport: A Case Study of Two Middle-Sized Cities," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-25, May.
    14. Buys, Laurie & Miller, Evonne, 2011. "Conceptualising convenience: Transportation practices and perceptions of inner-urban high density residents in Brisbane, Australia," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 289-297, January.
    15. repec:hal:wpaper:hal-00827972 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Jia Hu & Zhexi Lian & Xiaoxue Sun & Arno Eichberger & Zhen Zhang & Jintao Lai, 2024. "Dynamic Right-of-Way Allocation on Bus Priority Lanes Considering Traffic System Resilience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-18, February.
    17. Chen, Dongxu & Sun, Yu & Yang, Zhongzhen, 2020. "Optimization of the travel ban scheme of cars based on the spatial distribution of the last digit of license plates," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 43-53.
    18. Mateusz Szarata & Piotr Olszewski & Lesław Bichajło, 2021. "Simulation Study of Dynamic Bus Lane Concept," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-15, January.
    19. Monchambert, Guillaume & de Palma, André, 2014. "Public transport reliability and commuter strategy," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 14-29.
    20. Varga, Balázs & Tettamanti, Tamás & Kulcsár, Balázs & Qu, Xiaobo, 2020. "Public transport trajectory planning with probabilistic guarantees," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 81-101.
    21. Joana Cavadas & António Pais Antunes, 2019. "An optimization model for integrated transit-parking policy planning," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(5), pages 1867-1891, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pubtra:v:10:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s12469-018-0191-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.