IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transe/v114y2018icp163-184.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A linear bus rapid transit with transit signal priority formulation

Author

Listed:
  • Islam, Tarikul
  • Vu, Hai L.
  • Hoang, Nam H.
  • Cricenti, Antonio

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a novel mathematical framework to formulate a unified Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) with Transit Signal Priority (TSP) system for single destination networks, namely, Bus Priority System Optimal Dynamic Traffic Assignment with Signal Control (BP SODTA-SC). This framework considers dedicated bus lanes, bus routes, and priority for public bus transport in mixed bus-car scenarios. Furthermore, this approach assures fairness to all road users. It is linear and can be applied to analyze city-size BRT-TSP systems. Our numerical results show that bus priority significantly reduces Total System-wide Passenger Travel Time (TSPT).

Suggested Citation

  • Islam, Tarikul & Vu, Hai L. & Hoang, Nam H. & Cricenti, Antonio, 2018. "A linear bus rapid transit with transit signal priority formulation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 163-184.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:114:y:2018:i:c:p:163-184
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2018.03.009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554517307809
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tre.2018.03.009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shen, Wei & Zhang, H.M., 2014. "System optimal dynamic traffic assignment: Properties and solution procedures in the case of a many-to-one network," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 1-17.
    2. Carey, Malachy & Subrahmanian, Eswaran, 2000. "An approach to modelling time-varying flows on congested networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 157-183, April.
    3. Chiu, Yi-Chang & Zheng, Hong, 2007. "Real-time mobilization decisions for multi-priority emergency response resources and evacuation groups: Model formulation and solution," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(6), pages 710-736, November.
    4. Athanasios K. Ziliaskopoulos, 2000. "A Linear Programming Model for the Single Destination System Optimum Dynamic Traffic Assignment Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 37-49, February.
    5. MERCHANT, Deepak K. & NEMHAUSER, George L., 1978. "A model and an algorithm for the dynamic traffic assignment problems," LIDAM Reprints CORE 346, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    6. Daganzo, Carlos F., 1994. "The cell transmission model: A dynamic representation of highway traffic consistent with the hydrodynamic theory," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 269-287, August.
    7. Eichler, Michael & Daganzo, Carlos F., 2006. "Bus lanes with intermittent priority: Strategy formulae and an evaluation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 40(9), pages 731-744, November.
    8. Hong K. Lo, 2001. "A Cell-Based Traffic Control Formulation: Strategies and Benefits of Dynamic Timing Plans," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 148-164, May.
    9. Hong Zheng & Yi-Chang Chiu, 2011. "A Network Flow Algorithm for the Cell-Based Single-Destination System Optimal Dynamic Traffic Assignment Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(1), pages 121-137, February.
    10. MERCHANT, Deepak K. & NEMHAUSER, George L., 1978. "Optimality conditions for a dynamic traffic assignment model," LIDAM Reprints CORE 345, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    11. Lo, Hong K. & Chang, Elbert & Chan, Yiu Cho, 2001. "Dynamic network traffic control," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 721-744, September.
    12. Deepak K. Merchant & George L. Nemhauser, 1978. "Optimality Conditions for a Dynamic Traffic Assignment Model," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(3), pages 200-207, August.
    13. Nie, Yu (Marco), 2011. "A cell-based Merchant-Nemhauser model for the system optimum dynamic traffic assignment problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 329-342, February.
    14. Como, Giacomo & Lovisari, Enrico & Savla, Ketan, 2016. "Convexity and robustness of dynamic traffic assignment and freeway network control," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 446-465.
    15. Doan, Kien & Ukkusuri, Satish V., 2012. "On the holding-back problem in the cell transmission based dynamic traffic assignment models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(9), pages 1218-1238.
    16. Daganzo, Carlos F., 1995. "The cell transmission model, part II: Network traffic," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 79-93, April.
    17. Wu, Jianping & Hounsell, Nick, 1998. "Bus Priority Using pre-signals," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 32(8), pages 563-583, November.
    18. Lo, Hong K., 1999. "A novel traffic signal control formulation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 433-448, August.
    19. Deepak K. Merchant & George L. Nemhauser, 1978. "A Model and an Algorithm for the Dynamic Traffic Assignment Problems," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(3), pages 183-199, August.
    20. Chang, Gang-len & Vasudevan, Meenakshy & Su, Chih-chiang, 1996. "Modelling and evaluation of adaptive bus-preemption control with and without Automatic Vehicle Location systems," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 251-268, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sitti Asmah Hassan & Intan Nurfauzirah Shafiqah Hamzani & Abd. Ramzi Sabli & Nur Sabahiah Abdul Sukor, 2021. "Bus Rapid Transit System Introduction in Johor Bahru: A Simulation-Based Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-13, April.
    2. Zhang, Ping & Sun, Huijun & Qu, Yunchao & Yin, Haodong & Jin, Jian Gang & Wu, Jianjun, 2021. "Model and algorithm of coordinated flow controlling with station-based constraints in a metro system," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    3. Jin, Hui & Liu, Yue & Wu, Telan & Zhang, Yanpei, 2022. "Site-specific optimization of bus stop locations and designs over a corridor," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 599(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chou, Chang-Chi & Chiang, Wen-Chu & Chen, Albert Y., 2022. "Emergency medical response in mass casualty incidents considering the traffic congestions in proximity on-site and hospital delays," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    2. Long, Jiancheng & Wang, Chao & Szeto, W.Y., 2018. "Dynamic system optimum simultaneous route and departure time choice problems: Intersection-movement-based formulations and comparisons," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 166-206.
    3. Satsukawa, Koki & Wada, Kentaro & Watling, David, 2022. "Dynamic system optimal traffic assignment with atomic users: Convergence and stability," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 188-209.
    4. Wang, Peirong (Slade) & Li, Pengfei (Taylor) & Chowdhury, Farzana R. & Zhang, Li & Zhou, Xuesong, 2020. "A mixed integer programming formulation and scalable solution algorithms for traffic control coordination across multiple intersections based on vehicle space-time trajectories," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 266-304.
    5. Mohebifard, Rasool & Hajbabaie, Ali, 2019. "Optimal network-level traffic signal control: A benders decomposition-based solution algorithm," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 252-274.
    6. Ma, Rui & Ban, Xuegang (Jeff) & Pang, Jong-Shi, 2014. "Continuous-time dynamic system optimum for single-destination traffic networks with queue spillbacks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 98-122.
    7. Long, Jiancheng & Szeto, W.Y. & Huang, Hai-Jun & Gao, Ziyou, 2015. "An intersection-movement-based stochastic dynamic user optimal route choice model for assessing network performance," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 182-217.
    8. Zhu, Feng & Ukkusuri, Satish V., 2017. "Efficient and fair system states in dynamic transportation networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 272-289.
    9. Lu, Chung-Cheng & Liu, Jiangtao & Qu, Yunchao & Peeta, Srinivas & Rouphail, Nagui M. & Zhou, Xuesong, 2016. "Eco-system optimal time-dependent flow assignment in a congested network," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 217-239.
    10. Nie, Yu (Marco), 2011. "A cell-based Merchant-Nemhauser model for the system optimum dynamic traffic assignment problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 329-342, February.
    11. Shen, Wei & Zhang, H.M., 2009. "On the morning commute problem in a corridor network with multiple bottlenecks: Its system-optimal traffic flow patterns and the realizing tolling scheme," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 267-284, March.
    12. Zhang, Pinchao & Qian, Sean, 2020. "Path-based system optimal dynamic traffic assignment: A subgradient approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 41-63.
    13. Long, Jiancheng & Szeto, W.Y. & Gao, Ziyou & Huang, Hai-Jun & Shi, Qin, 2016. "The nonlinear equation system approach to solving dynamic user optimal simultaneous route and departure time choice problems," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 179-206.
    14. S. Waller & Athanasios Ziliaskopoulos, 2006. "A Combinatorial user optimal dynamic traffic assignment algorithm," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 144(1), pages 249-261, April.
    15. Como, Giacomo & Lovisari, Enrico & Savla, Ketan, 2016. "Convexity and robustness of dynamic traffic assignment and freeway network control," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 446-465.
    16. Lu, Gongyuan & Nie, Yu(Marco) & Liu, Xiaobo & Li, Denghui, 2019. "Trajectory-based traffic management inside an autonomous vehicle zone," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 76-98.
    17. Carey, Malachy, 2021. "The cell transmission model with free-flow speeds varying over time or space," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 245-257.
    18. Jiancheng Long & Wai Yuen Szeto, 2019. "Link-Based System Optimum Dynamic Traffic Assignment Problems in General Networks," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(1), pages 167-182, January.
    19. Tong, C. O. & Wong, S. C., 2000. "A predictive dynamic traffic assignment model in congested capacity-constrained road networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 34(8), pages 625-644, November.
    20. Ben-Tal, Aharon & Chung, Byung Do & Mandala, Supreet Reddy & Yao, Tao, 2011. "Robust optimization for emergency logistics planning: Risk mitigation in humanitarian relief supply chains," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(8), pages 1177-1189, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:114:y:2018:i:c:p:163-184. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600244/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.