IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jorgde/v11y2022i4d10.1007_s41469-022-00126-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Designing chief innovation officer positions: a strategic contingency framework

Author

Listed:
  • Joseph L. C. Cheng

    (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)

  • E. Geoffrey Love

    (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)

Abstract

Many companies have recently created a new Chief Innovation Officer (CIO) position as a mechanism to help strengthen firm innovation capabilities, but little research is available to help them structure and support it for success. This paper works to illuminate key features and challenges associated with these positions. It does so by integrating findings from roundtable discussions among innovation management executives with scholarly organizational design concepts including competitive strategy, exploration and exploitation, organizational ambidexterity, alignment, change, and power. The paper’s centerpiece is a strategic contingency framework designed to tailor CIO position configurations to different core firm strategies. The framework is built around the well-established and validated Miles and Snow strategic typology. It defines key roles and responsibilities of a CIO position depending on their firm’s strategic orientation (i.e., Defender, Prospector, or Analyzer). The framework also identifies specific organizational resources and support needed for the CIO in each case. The paper concludes by discussing broader insights from our analysis of the CIO position and implications for management practitioners and scholars.

Suggested Citation

  • Joseph L. C. Cheng & E. Geoffrey Love, 2022. "Designing chief innovation officer positions: a strategic contingency framework," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 11(4), pages 115-128, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jorgde:v:11:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s41469-022-00126-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s41469-022-00126-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41469-022-00126-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s41469-022-00126-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James G. March, 1991. "Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(1), pages 71-87, February.
    2. A. Canato & D. Ravasi & N. Phillips, 2013. "Coerced practice implementation in cases of low cultural fit: cultural change and practice adaptation during the implementation of six sigma at 3 M," Post-Print hal-00844055, HAL.
    3. Maria Guadalupe & Hongyi Li & Julie Wulf, 2014. "Who Lives in the C-Suite? Organizational Structure and the Division of Labor in Top Management," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(4), pages 824-844, April.
    4. Shenghui Ma & Yasemin Y. Kor & David Seidl, 2022. "Top management team role structure: A vantage point for advancing upper echelons research," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(8), pages 1-28, August.
    5. Donald C. Hambrick & Albert A. Cannella, 2004. "CEOs who have COOs: contingency analysis of an unexplored structural form," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(10), pages 959-979, October.
    6. Johann Peter Murmann, 2014. "Reflections on Choosing the Appropriate Level of Abstraction in Social Science Research. 关于在社会科学研究中选择适当的抽象水平的反思," Management and Organization Review, The International Association for Chinese Management Research, vol. 10(3), pages 381-389, November.
    7. Murmann, Johann Peter, 2014. "Reflections on Choosing the Appropriate Level of Abstraction in Social Science Research," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(3), pages 381-389, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Philip Mark Plotch, 2024. "Innovation, collaboration, and chief innovation officers," Journal of Critical Infrastructure Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 5(1), pages 13-16, July.
    2. Tjaša Štrukelj & Petya Dankova & Nomi Hrast, 2023. "Strategic Transition to Sustainability: A Cybernetic Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-32, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bendig, David, 2022. "Chief operating officer characteristics and how they relate to exploration via patenting versus venturing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 297-309.
    2. Elitsa R. Banalieva & Ravi Sarathy, 2011. "A Contingency Theory of Internationalization," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 51(5), pages 593-634, October.
    3. Oriana Bandiera & Andrea Prat & Raffaella Sadun & Julie Wulf, 2012. "Span of Control and Span of Activity," CEP Discussion Papers dp1139, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    4. Jaeger, Nikolai A. & Zacharias, Nicolas A. & Brettel, Malte, 2016. "Nonlinear and dynamic effects of responsive and proactive market orientation: A longitudinal investigation," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 767-779.
    5. Sven Kunisch & Markus Menz & David Collis, 2020. "Corporate headquarters in the twenty-first century: an organization design perspective," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 9(1), pages 1-32, December.
    6. L. M. Daphne Yiu & Hugo K. S. Lam & Andy C. L. Yeung & T. C. E. Cheng, 2020. "Enhancing the Financial Returns of R&D Investments through Operations Management," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(7), pages 1658-1678, July.
    7. Rovelli, Paola, 2020. ""I am stuck in meetings": Understanding the relation of CEO time management with TMT size and gender diversity," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 777-790.
    8. Pascal Back & Andreas Bausch, 2019. "Not If, But How CEOs Affect Product Innovation: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(03), pages 1-52, May.
    9. Stéphane J. G. Girod & Richard Whittington, 2017. "Reconfiguration, restructuring and firm performance: Dynamic capabilities and environmental dynamism," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(5), pages 1121-1133, May.
    10. Sebastian Firk & André Hanelt & Jana Oehmichen & Michael Wolff, 2021. "Chief Digital Officers: An Analysis of the Presence of a Centralized Digital Transformation Role," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(7), pages 1800-1831, November.
    11. Sven Kunisch & Julian Birkinshaw & Michael Boppel & Kira Choi, 2023. "Why do firms launch corporate change programs?," Post-Print hal-04325790, HAL.
    12. Nina Engels & Denise Fischer-Kreer & Malte Brettel, 2022. "CHRO firm dinosaur versus CHRO role gorilla: the effect of CHRO company and role tenure on firms’ social performance," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 92(6), pages 929-954, August.
    13. John C. Eklund, 2022. "The knowledge‐incentive tradeoff: Understanding the relationship between research and development decentralization and innovation," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(12), pages 2478-2509, December.
    14. Joseph Kirby & Natalie Gerhart & John R. Wingender, 2022. "Firm financial outcomes: The impact of technology leaders," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(8), pages 3854-3871, December.
    15. Codou Samba & Daan Van Knippenberg & C. Chet Miller, 2018. "The impact of strategic dissent on organizational outcomes: A meta‐analytic integration," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(2), pages 379-402, February.
    16. Shenghui Ma & Yasemin Y. Kor & David Seidl, 2022. "Top management team role structure: A vantage point for advancing upper echelons research," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(8), pages 1-28, August.
    17. Arman Avadikyan & Gilles Lambert & Christophe Lerch, 2016. "A Multi-Level Perspective on Ambidexterity: The Case of a Synchrotron Research Facility," Working Papers of BETA 2016-44, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    18. Henri A. Schildt & Markku V.J. Maula & Thomas Keil, 2005. "Explorative and Exploitative Learning from External Corporate Ventures," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 29(4), pages 493-515, July.
    19. Giuliani, Elisa & Martinelli, Arianna & Rabellotti, Roberta, 2016. "Is Co-Invention Expediting Technological Catch Up? A Study of Collaboration between Emerging Country Firms and EU Inventors," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 192-205.
    20. Insoo Cho & Peter F. Orazem, 2021. "How endogenous risk preferences and sample selection affect analysis of firm survival," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 1309-1332, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jorgde:v:11:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s41469-022-00126-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.