IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/hecrev/v15y2025i1d10.1186_s13561-025-00642-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Valuation of informal care for the old-aged with disabilities in China—a discrete choice experiment approach

Author

Listed:
  • Zhan Zhao

    (Wuhan University)

  • Shuaizhen Chen

    (Qingdao Laoshan District Finance Bureau)

  • Fengyi Sun

    (Wuhan University)

  • Wenjing Cheng

    (Pudong New Area Medical Insurance Affairs Center)

  • Chen Chen

    (Wuhan University)

  • Elizabeth Maitland

    (University of Liverpool)

  • Stephen Nicholas

    (Australian National Institute of Management and Commerce
    University of Newcastle)

  • Jian Wang

    (Wuhan University
    Wuhan University)

  • Lei Si

    (Western Sydney University
    Western Sydney University)

  • Jialong Tan

    (Wuhan University)

Abstract

Background The rapidly aging population will lead to a surge in demand for long-term care services in China. Reinforced by the cultural norms, and with inadequate nursing resources and social care facilities, long-term care in China is primary the responsibility of the immediate family. Despite the central role of family caregivers, little is known about their preferences and how they value different types of caregiving tasks. This study provides new evidence on the economic valuation of informal care in the Chinese context. Methods Discrete choice experiment (DCE) and mixed logit models (MXL) were employed to measure the preferences for an economic value of different types of informal care (daily care, medical care and companion care) among old-aged adults in China. 466 participants from nationwide were recruited and interviewed. Results Among the respondents, 19.5% always chose to receive the free care package and 15.2% always chose to obtain cash compensation for informal caregiving. Of the three care tasks, participants placed the highest value on daily care (RMB48.202 ($13.26 PPP) per hour) and the lowest value on companion care (RMB18.608 ($5.12 PPP) per hour). The probability of choosing cash compensation rose when compensation increased and fells when the care time increased. The preferences for assistance varied significantly by individual’s demographic and health-related characteristics. Female respondents preferred for care packages relative to males; farmers and current caregivers preferred cash compensation; married participants had low preferences for companion care; participants from western region had low preferences for medical care. Discussion Our findings confirm the importance of cash compensation in retaining caregivers to provide informal care. The heterogeneity of preferences among different groups is significantly influenced by their sex, occupation, caregiving, marital status and region. Our study supports the promotion of cash compensation to informal caregivers and different levels of incentives for different groups of informal caregivers. Graphical Abstract

Suggested Citation

  • Zhan Zhao & Shuaizhen Chen & Fengyi Sun & Wenjing Cheng & Chen Chen & Elizabeth Maitland & Stephen Nicholas & Jian Wang & Lei Si & Jialong Tan, 2025. "Valuation of informal care for the old-aged with disabilities in China—a discrete choice experiment approach," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:hecrev:v:15:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1186_s13561-025-00642-7
    DOI: 10.1186/s13561-025-00642-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1186/s13561-025-00642-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1186/s13561-025-00642-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:hecrev:v:15:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1186_s13561-025-00642-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/13561 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.