IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sls/ipmsls/v50y20264.html

The Anatomy of the U.S. Manufacturing Productivity Slowdown: Evidence from Firms and Industries

Author

Listed:
  • Danial Lashkari
  • Jeremy Pearce

Abstract

U.S. manufacturing labour productivity growth fell from roughly 3.5 per cent per year over 1987–2007 to near zero over 2010–2022. Growth in total factor productivity (TFP) also fell to near zero over the same period. This article examines the sources of that slowdown by decomposing manufacturing productivity growth into contributions from leader and follower firms within frontier and laggard industries. We find that the slowdown is broad-based: both for labour productivity and TFP, productivity growth declined among both leaders and followers, across alternative weighting methods, and multiple industry groupings. Standard models of economic growth treat research and development (R&D) as the primary channel through which firms generate productivity growth. The broad-based nature of the slowdown raises the question of whether the translation of R&D expenditures into productivity gains has weakened. We estimate an R&D production function at both the industry and firm levels and find that the elasticity of productivity with respect to R&D is consistently larger in the earlier period than in the full sample, even as R&D expenditure has risen across firms and industries. These results suggest that the slowdown reflects declining research productivity rather than reduced innovation effort.

Suggested Citation

  • Danial Lashkari & Jeremy Pearce, 2026. "The Anatomy of the U.S. Manufacturing Productivity Slowdown: Evidence from Firms and Industries," International Productivity Monitor, Centre for the Study of Living Standards, vol. 50, pages 79-98, Spring.
  • Handle: RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:50:y:2026:4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/international-productivity-monitor-50th-issue/the-anatomy-of-the-us-manufacturing-productivity-slowdown-evidence-from-firms-and-industries/
    File Function: Version francaise disponible / French version available
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://csls.ca/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/IPM_Pearce_Final.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maarten De Ridder, 2024. "Market Power and Innovation in the Intangible Economy," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 114(1), pages 199-251, January.
    2. Peter J. Klenow & Huiyu Li & Theodore Naff, 2019. "Is Rising Concentration Hampering Productivity Growth?," FRBSF Economic Letter, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.
    3. Pablo Ottonello & Thomas Winberry, 2020. "Financial Heterogeneity and the Investment Channel of Monetary Policy," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 88(6), pages 2473-2502, November.
    4. Criscuolo, Chiara & Andrews, Dan & Gal, Peter N., 2019. "The best versus the rest: divergence across firms during the global productivity slowdown," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 103405, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Danial Lashkari & Jeremy Pearce, 2024. "The Mysterious Slowdown in U.S. Manufacturing Productivity," Liberty Street Economics 20240711, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
    6. Nicholas Bloom & Charles I. Jones & John Van Reenen & Michael Webb, 2020. "Are Ideas Getting Harder to Find?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 110(4), pages 1104-1144, April.
    7. Chad Syverson, 2017. "Challenges to Mismeasurement Explanations for the US Productivity Slowdown," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 31(2), pages 165-186, Spring.
    8. Ulrich Doraszelski & Jordi Jaumandreu, 2013. "R&D and Productivity: Estimating Endogenous Productivity," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 80(4), pages 1338-1383.
    9. Maarten De Ridder & Basile Grassi & Giovanni Morzenti, 2026. "The Hitchhiker's Guide to Markup Estimation: Assessing Estimates From Financial Data," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 94(1), pages 137-168, January.
    10. Manuel Arellano & Stephen Bond, 1991. "Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 58(2), pages 277-297.
    11. John G. Fernald, 2015. "Productivity and Potential Output before, during, and after the Great Recession," NBER Macroeconomics Annual, University of Chicago Press, vol. 29(1), pages 1-51.
    12. Blundell, Richard & Bond, Stephen, 1998. "Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 115-143, August.
    13. Ufuk Akcigit & Sina T. Ates, 2023. "What Happened to US Business Dynamism?," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 131(8), pages 2059-2124.
    14. Enghin Atalay & Ali Hortaçsu & Nicole Kimmel & Chad Syverson, 2025. "Why Is Manufacturing Productivity Growth So Low?," NBER Working Papers 34264, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    15. David Roodman, 2009. "How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata," Stata Journal, StataCorp LLC, vol. 9(1), pages 86-136, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ian Goldin & Pantelis Koutroumpis & François Lafond & Julian Winkler, 2024. "Why Is Productivity Slowing Down?," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 62(1), pages 196-268, March.
    2. Ye, Lei, 2026. "Bank concentration, product market competition and productivity growth," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    3. Kritikos, Alexander S. & Schiersch, Alexander & Stiel, Caroline, 2021. "The Productivity Puzzle in Business Services," IZA Discussion Papers 14610, IZA Network @ LISER.
    4. Alexander Amundsen & Danny Leung & Oana Secrieru, 2026. "Business dynamism and financial constraints," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 59(1), pages 67-105, February.
    5. Dong, Kangyin & Wei, Shuo & Liu, Yang & Zhao, Jun, 2023. "How does energy poverty eradication promote common prosperity in China? The role of labor productivity," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    6. Marie Le Mouel & Alexander Schiersch, 2020. "Knowledge-Based Capital and Productivity Divergence," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1868, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    7. Alexander S. Kritikos & Alexander Schiersch & Caroline Stiel, 2022. "The productivity shock in business services," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 59(3), pages 1273-1299, October.
    8. Giuseppe Berlingieri & Sara Calligaris & Chiara Criscuolo & Rudy Verlhac, 2025. "Last But Not Least: Laggard Firms, Technology Diffusion, And Its Structural And Policy Determinants," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 66(2), pages 595-627, May.
    9. Jamil, Nida & Chaudhry, Theresa Thompson & Chaudhry, Azam, 2022. "Trading textiles along the new silk route: The impact on Pakistani firms of gaining market access to China," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    10. Gonzálvez, Rubén & Cárdenas, Luis, 2026. "Leverage, liquidity, and investment: The cyclical effects of corporate debt," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    11. Feld, Lars P. & Schmidt, Christoph M. & Schnabel, Isabel & Truger, Achim & Wieland, Volker, 2019. "Den Strukturwandel meistern. Jahresgutachten 2019/20 [Dealing with Structural Change. Annual Report 2019/20]," Annual Economic Reports / Jahresgutachten, German Council of Economic Experts / Sachverständigenrat zur Begutachtung der gesamtwirtschaftlichen Entwicklung, volume 127, number 201920.
    12. Bruno Merlevede & Angelos Theodorakopoulos, 2016. "Productivity effects from inter-industry offshoring and inshoring: Firm-level evidence from Belgium," FIW Working Paper series 165, FIW.
    13. Sweet, Cassandra & Eterovic, Dalibor, 2019. "Do patent rights matter? 40 years of innovation, complexity and productivity," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 78-93.
    14. Daniel Ştefan Armeanu & Georgeta Vintilă & Ştefan Cristian Gherghina, 2017. "Empirical Study towards the Drivers of Sustainable Economic Growth in EU-28 Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-22, December.
    15. Cho, Seo-young & Vadlamannati, Krishna Chaitanya, 2010. "Compliance for big brothers: An empirical analysis on the impact of the anti-trafficking protocol," University of Göttingen Working Papers in Economics 118, University of Goettingen, Department of Economics.
    16. Hakkala, Katariina & Heyman, Fredrik & Sjöholm, Fredrik, 2007. "Cross-Border Acquisitions, Multinationals and Wage Elasticities," Working Paper Series 709, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
    17. Manthos D. Delis & Sotirios Kokas & Steven Ongena, 2016. "Foreign Ownership and Market Power in Banking: Evidence from a World Sample," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 48(2-3), pages 449-483, March.
    18. Ouedraogo, Benoît & Ouedraogo, Idrissa & Sawadogo, Hamidou, 2025. "Effects of trade openness on income inequality in sub-Saharan Africa: direct effects and transmission channels," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    19. Emrah Kocak & Hayriye Hilal Baglitas, 2022. "The path to sustainable municipal solid waste management: Do human development, energy efficiency, and income inequality matter?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(6), pages 1947-1962, December.
    20. Huy Quang Doan, 2019. "Trade, Institutional Quality and Income: Empirical Evidence for Sub-Saharan Africa," Economies, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-23, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:50:y:2026:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CSLS (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cslssca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.